Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch

Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch

2025-11-04Technology
--:--
--:--
Elon
Good morning 44, I'm Elon, and this is Goose Pod. Today is Tuesday, November 04th, 23:18.
Taylor Weaver
And I'm Taylor Weaver. We're discussing Perplexity's multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images!
Elon
Alright 44, Perplexity, the AI search startup, signed a multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images. This is a pivotal shift, Taylor, from scraping allegations to formal partnerships, legally displaying Getty's visuals.
Taylor Weaver
Exactly, Elon! They've collaborated for over a year, Getty even in their Publishers’ Program. This isn't a traditional lump sum deal, smart since Perplexity doesn't train foundational models. It legitimizes prior image usage.
Elon
Indeed. Getty's Nick Unsworth said it "acknowledges the importance of properly attributed consent." This is crucial for trust in AI. For a visionary, demanding ethical guardrails is paramount.
Taylor Weaver
And Perplexity's Jessica Chan emphasized, "Attribution and accuracy are fundamental." They want powerful visual storytelling, always linking to the source. A brilliant move for transparency, I think!
Taylor Weaver
Elon, this Getty deal is a huge turnaround for Perplexity. They've faced serious copyright lawsuits from Nikkei, Asahi Shimbun, and Wall Street Journal for alleged unauthorized content.
Elon
Indeed. But Perplexity adapts. They’ve launched a revenue-sharing model, partnering with TIME. It shows a pragmatic shift after their initial, "unfiltered" content acquisition strategies.
Taylor Weaver
Getty’s strategy also matured! After suing Stability AI, they’re now actively licensing content. This is a massive pivot from confrontation to collaboration, ensuring legal compliance. Their shares soared 70% premarket!
Elon
That surge speaks volumes, Taylor. It confirms AI firms will pay for high-quality content. The idea of endlessly free content for AI training is unsustainable, though licensing all internet content remains complex.
Taylor Weaver
It's a new era. Perplexity is rocketing, potentially reaching a $9 billion valuation. With 350 million queries last September, they're refining their ad model, prioritizing user trust. It's about sustainable growth.
Taylor Weaver
Elon, despite the Getty deal, Perplexity faces intense conflict. Britannica alleges their "answer engine" cannibalizes traffic and creates trademark violations via AI "hallucinations." Forbes and WIRED also criticized their content.
Elon
Yes, a relentless legal battle. They’re accused of using "stealth" crawlers, copying articles verbatim, and building a $3 billion business on "stolen content." News Corp and The New York Times have both taken action.
Taylor Weaver
And it's widespread! Reddit even sued Perplexity in October, alleging "industrial-scale, unlawful" scraping of user content, circumventing technical measures. This underscores these broad copyright infringement allegations.
Elon
The impact of these AI copyright battles is immense, Taylor. Getty versus Stability AI is stark: over 12 million images allegedly used without permission. Getty's CEO stated fighting such cases is "extraordinarily expensive," highlighting significant challenges for rights holders.
Taylor Weaver
Precisely, Elon. It exposes a fundamental economic imbalance. Content creators bear creation costs, while AI platforms capture value. AI's "speed and volume" necessitates robust licensing models where AI firms pay for content, ensuring value returns to creators.
Taylor Weaver
Elon, for the future, Perplexity's profit-sharing, 80% to publishers, shows a key direction for fair compensation in AI content licensing.
Elon
Crucial. If courts back publishers, mandatory licensing costs will hit AI companies. "RSL" standards emerge, demanding AI companies pay for scraped content. Accountability is key.
Elon
That's our Goose Pod for you. Thanks for listening, 44.
Taylor Weaver
See you tomorrow!

Perplexity's multi-year deal with Getty Images marks a shift from copyright concerns to formal partnerships, legitimizing visual usage. This move, alongside a TIME revenue-sharing model, signals Perplexity's pragmatic pivot towards sustainable growth and user trust amidst ongoing lawsuits from major publishers over alleged content scraping.

Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch

Read original at TechCrunch

AI search startup Perplexity has signed a multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images, which gives it permission to display images from Getty across its AI-powered search and discovery tools. The deal marks a notable shift for the company, which has been hit by allegations of content scraping and plagiarism, and signals an effort to establish more formal content partnerships.

Perplexity and Getty have been working together for more than a year, a source familiar with the deal told TechCrunch. Though it was never announced, Getty was part of Perplexity’s Publishers’ Program, a plan to share ad revenue with publishers when their content surfaced in a search query, the source said.

Today’s agreement is a new deal. A source told TechCrunch it’s not a traditional lump sum licensing deal, since Perplexity doesn’t train its own foundational models, but would not elaborate on the terms. Perplexity’s agreement with Getty appears to legitimize some of the startup’s previous use of Getty’s stock photos.

Perplexity has come under fire within the last year for a series of plagiarism accusations from several news organizations. In one case, the startup was called out for pulling content from a Wall Street Journal article, including the Getty photo in that piece. At the time, several outlets questioned whether Perplexity’s use of the images constituted copyright infringement.

A source last year told TechCrunch that Perplexity was working on an agreement with Getty, but we were unable to confirm the deal after reaching out to the stock image giant several times. More recently, Reddit sued Perplexity in October, alleging “industrial-scale, unlawful” scraping of user content and circumventing technical measures to access data.

Reddit has a data licensing agreement with OpenAI. Perplexity says its Getty deal will help it better display images and include credits with links back to the original source whenever images show up in search results. Nick Unsworth, vice president of strategic development at Getty, said the agreement “acknowledges the importance of properly attributed consent and its value in enhancing AI-powered products.

” “Attribution and accuracy are fundamental to how people should understand the world in an age of AI,” Jessica Chan, head of content and publisher partnerships at Perplexity, said in a statement. “Together, we’re helping people discover answers through powerful visual storytelling while ensuring they always know where that content comes from and who created it.

” Perplexity’s emphasis on attribution is part of its strategy of defending against copyright accusations by arguing its use of publisher content — including content behind a paywall or that publishers have explicitly indicated they don’t want scraped — constitutes “fair use” because publicly available facts are not copyrightable.

Rebecca Bellan is a senior reporter at TechCrunch where she covers the business, policy, and emerging trends shaping artificial intelligence. Her work has also appeared in Forbes, Bloomberg, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, and other publications. You can contact or verify outreach from Rebecca by emailing rebecca.

bellan@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at rebeccabellan.491 on Signal. View Bio

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts