NFL:漏判引“臀推”从严判罚

NFL:漏判引“臀推”从严判罚

2025-10-12Sports
--:--
--:--
金姐
早上好,老王,我是金姐,这是为你专属打造的 Goose Pod。今天是10月12日,星期日,早上8点11分。哎哟喂,今天咱们要聊个大事儿,NFL最近因为一个战术闹得是沸沸扬扬。
雷总hi
Okay,我是雷总hi。我们今天要讨论的话题就是:NFL因为一次关键的漏判,导致现在要对备受争议的“臀推”战术进行从严判罚。这个话题背后,可不仅仅是一个战术那么简单。
金姐
没错,那咱们就直接切入正题吧。事情的导火索是第二周费城老鹰队对阵堪萨斯城酋长队的比赛。老鹰队靠着他们那个“臀推”战术,最终20比17赢了比赛。但赛后,联盟自己站出来打自己脸了。
雷总hi
是的,NFL在给裁判和32支球队分发的培训录像里明确指出,老鹰队在那场比赛的一次关键“臀推”进攻中,本应该被判罚“提前移动”(False Start)。具体来说,是他们的右护锋泰勒·斯汀在开球前有轻微移动。
金姐
哎哟喂,这就有意思了。联盟的裁判培训发展副总裁,叫雷蒙·乔治的,亲自下场解说。他说这个球“非常难吹”,因为攻防两边都挤作一团,但他明说了:“我们希望判罚更严谨,任何进攻组的微小移动,我们都想把它扼杀在摇篮里。”
雷总hi
Okay,这个表态非常关键。酋长队的主教练安迪·里德赛后就抱怨说,感觉老鹰队有好几次都抢跑了。就连在做解说的传奇四分卫汤姆·布雷迪也看出来了,说老鹰队的进攻锋线球员在开球前就动了,但裁判没吹。
金姐
那场比赛,老鹰队用了六次“臀推”,拿了四个首攻,还有一个达阵。效率高得吓人!但现在联盟这么一说,老鹰队的中锋卡姆·尤尔根斯就炸毛了,他说:“我听了无数种说法,快烦死了!说我站位越位,说我抱球……我们只想打好自己的球!”
雷总hi
可以理解他的心情。但这件事的影响已经超出了比赛本身。特别是对于酋长队来说,他们开局0胜2负,这场失利让他们直接跌出了实力榜前十。这种因为争议判罚输掉的比赛,对士气的打击是双重的,也让这个“臀推”战术的争议性达到了顶点。
金姐
可不是嘛!输球本来就够难受了,还是因为这种方式。这就好比你考试考不过隔壁班的学霸,结果发现他用的那支“神笔”可能是违规的,现在监考老师说要重点观察他。这下,整个联盟的目光都聚焦在这个“臀推”上了。完美!
金姐
哎哟喂,说了半天“臀推”,估计有些听众还云里雾里。雷总,你用你那工程师的逻辑,给大家拆解拆解,这到底是个什么“神操作”?让费城老鹰队跟开了挂一样。
雷总hi
Okay,没问题。我把它叫做一个“PPT式”的分解。这个战术,官方点叫“Brotherly Shove”,兄弟之推。简单说,就是四分卫开球后,不是自己往前拱,而是他身后的两名球员,像助推器一样,一人一边屁股,猛地发力推着他往前冲。
金姐
听着怎么有点滑稽呢?但效果惊人。这玩意儿是谁发明的?总不能是老鹰队拍脑门想出来的吧?这种战术的根源,肯定有它的历史演变。给我扒一扒它的前世今生。
雷总hi
它的起源可以追溯到2005年,当时NFL修改了规则,允许球员“推”持球者,但不允许“拉”。这个规则的修改是关键。然后,各队开始有类似的尝试,但真正把它发扬光大,系统化、科学化的是老鹰队。这得归功于他们的主教练尼克·西里安尼。
金姐
哦?就是说,规则早就允许了,但只有老鹰队把它玩明白了?他们是怎么做到的?四分卫贾伦·赫茨是不是有什么特别之处?我听说他力量很大,像个小坦克。
雷总hi
完全正确。赫茨强大的下肢力量是核心。老鹰队从2022年开始常规化使用这个战术,成功率高得惊人,超过了90%!他们在2022到2024年间执行了163次,拿到首攻或达阵的概率是87%,而联盟其他球队的平均成功率只有71%。差距巨大。
金姐
哎哟喂,90%的成功率?这在橄榄球里,尤其是在必须拿下的短码数转换上,简直就是作弊码!难怪其他球队都眼红,哭着喊着要联盟禁止它。我听说绿湾包装工队就带头提了好几次议案?
雷总hi
是的,包装工队在2025年两次提交议案要求禁止“臀推”,理由是“球员安全”和“比赛节奏”。但两次都失败了。第一次是4月份,联盟甚至没进行正式投票。第二次在5月份,投票结果22比10,差两票没能达到通过所需的24票。
金姐
差两票?真是惊险。不过话说回来,这战术真的有那么大的安全隐患吗?我怎么觉得更像是“我用不好,所以你也别想用”的逻辑呢?前老鹰队中锋杰森·凯尔西有句话说得好:“臀推对中锋来说糟透了,但它为老鹰队带来了胜利。”
雷总hi
这正是问题的核心。NFL执行副总裁特洛伊·文森特亲口证实,根据联盟数据,在2024赛季,没有任何一例伤病是直接由“臀推”战术造成的。所以,“球员安全”这个理由,目前看是站不住脚的。这让整个禁令的讨论,变得更加微妙。
金姐
好了,背景故事听完了,现在到了最精彩的部分——吵架环节!哎哟喂,我就喜欢看他们吵。反对“臀推”的,和支持的,两边肯定都有自己的道理。反方辩手,请开始你的表演!他们主要喷什么?
雷总hi
Okay,反方的论点主要有三个。第一,就是刚才提到的“球员安全”,虽然没有数据支撑,但这依然是他们最常用的理由,因为听起来最高尚。他们会说,那么多大体重球员挤在一个狭小空间,风险太高了。
金姐
切,没数据支撑的安全理由就是耍流氓。下一个!我猜猜,是不是说这战术太丑了,不“美观”?像评论员彼得·施拉格说的:“这不是我们想看的橄榄球。” 真是可笑,赢球才是硬道理,你管我姿势好不好看?完美!
雷总hi
金姐你猜对了。这确实是第二个主要论点:美学和观赏性。很多人认为,“臀推”缺乏技术含量,就是野蛮的推挤,破坏了橄榄球的战术美感。它把一个充满变数的短码数进攻,变成了一个几乎100%成功的确定性事件,降低了比赛的悬念。
金姐
哎哟喂,这帮人真是站着说话不腰疼。那支持方怎么说?肯定得反驳啊!难道就任由他们污名化一个在规则范围内的战术吗?这不公平!快,正方辩手,拿出你们的论据!
雷总hi
Okay,正方的核心论点非常直接:法无禁止即可为。2005年规则就允许推人了,这战术完全合法。而且,他们会反问,如果这个战术真的那么简单无脑,为什么全联盟只有老鹰队做得最好?这背后是无数的训练、默契和球员能力。
金姐
说得好!这才是问题的关键。这根本不是战术本身的问题,是人的问题!就像网上有人说的:“就因为老鹰队用得好,所以大家才想禁掉。要是达拉斯牛仔或者堪萨斯酋长用得这么溜,绝对没人会抱怨!” 这就是赤裸裸的嫉妒。
雷总hi
是的,而且关于“不可阻挡”这个说法,数据也显示并非如此。老鹰队的成功率已经从2022年的90%下降到了2024年的82%。这说明,防守方也在不断进化,寻找破解之道。它并非无解,只是很难被阻止。这正是竞技体育的魅力所在。
金姐
行了,吵也吵完了,禁也禁不掉。现在联盟来了个“曲线救国”,不明着禁止,但要求裁判“从严判罚”。哎哟喂,这招可真够“高”的。这会对比赛产生什么具体影响?首当其冲的就是老鹰队自己吧?
雷总hi
没错。最直接的影响就是,老鹰队使用“臀推”的风险大大增加了。以前可能一些微小的、在灰色地带的动作不会被吹罚,但现在,任何一点瑕疵,比如进攻锋线球员手指头的轻微颤动,都可能导致5码的罚退,直接扼杀这次进攻。
金姐
那不就等于给这个战术上了个“紧箍咒”吗?想用可以,但你得保证自己是圣人,一点错都不能犯。这对球员的心理压力得有多大?而且,这不更考验裁判的眼力了吗?本来就难吹,现在是拿着放大镜吹,能不出错吗?
雷总hi
是的,这对裁判的压力是巨大的。这会让比赛的流畅性下降,可能出现更多争议判罚。本来是想提升公平性,结果可能因为判罚尺度的不一,引发更多关于裁判公信力的质疑。这把双刃剑用不好,会伤到联盟自己。
金姐
那对其他球队呢?他们是不是都在旁边幸灾乐祸,看老鹰队的热闹?我记得之前有个新闻,说布法罗比尔队也投票支持禁止“臀推”,结果他们自己的球迷都懵了,在网上发帖问:“为啥啊?我们自己用这招是联盟第二高效的,我们是傻子吗?”
雷总hi
这个例子很有趣,它反映了联盟内部的矛盾心态。一方面,大家都想限制老鹰队。另一方面,一些球队自己也能从中受益。现在联盟从严判罚,可能会让那些想模仿的球队望而却步,因为学习成本和风险都变高了。最终,这可能真的会变成一个老鹰队的“专属”战术,但却是一个高风险的专属战术。
金姐
聊了这么多,那这个“臀推”的未来会怎么样?是被裁判的“严打”搞得名存实亡,还是说老鹰队能进化出2.0版本,继续独步天下?我感觉这事儿没那么容易结束。
雷总hi
Okay,我认为短期内,我们会看到“臀推”的使用频率有所下降。老鹰队会更加谨慎,只在最关键的时刻使用。同时,他们肯定也在研发新的短码数进攻战术,作为备用方案。毕竟,你不能把所有鸡蛋都放在一个被裁判盯死的篮子里。
金姐
那从联盟的角度看呢?这次“从严判罚”只是权宜之计,还是说到了2026年休赛期,他们会再次把“彻底禁止臀推”提上议程?毕竟竞赛委员会那帮大佬们,之前可是连正式提案都没给。
雷总hi
很有可能。这次的争议事件,给了竞赛委员会足够的理由和压力去重新审视这个问题。他们会观察一个赛季,看看从严判罚的效果如何。如果争议不断,或者真的出现了安全问题,那么在2026年提出正式的规则修改提案,就是大概率事件了。
金姐
哎哟喂,这真是一场精彩的博弈。进攻、防守、规则、裁判……多方势力的拉扯。不过我还是觉得,创新是不会停止的。就算“臀推”真的消失了,也一定会有下一个“臀推”出现。完美!
金姐
好了,今天的讨论也差不多了。总而言之,一次漏判就像一颗石子,在NFL这片湖面激起了千层浪。它让备受争议的“臀推”战术被推上了风口浪尖,也考验着联盟的智慧和裁判的权威。
雷总hi
是的,这不仅是一个战术的存亡问题,更关乎比赛的公平、观赏性和未来的发展方向。感谢老王收听Goose Pod,我们明天再见。

## NFL Mandates Stricter Officiating for "Tush Push" Play **News Title:** NFL: Officiate tush push ‘tight’ after missed call **Report Provider:** ESPN **Author:** Tim McManus **Date:** September 18, 2025 (with context from a recent game and past events) **URL:** https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46307930/nfl-officials-keep-eye-false-starts-tush-push ### Executive Summary The National Football League (NFL) has issued a directive to its officials to officiate the controversial "tush push" play with increased scrutiny, specifically focusing on potential false starts. This instruction follows a recent game where the Philadelphia Eagles employed the play against the Kansas City Chiefs, with the league acknowledging that the Eagles should have been flagged for at least one false start. While a proposal to ban the play failed this offseason, the NFL is now emphasizing a "tight" officiating approach to ensure fairness and adherence to the rules. ### Key Findings and Conclusions * **Stricter Officiating Mandated:** The NFL has instructed officials to call the "tush push" play "tight" moving forward, with a particular emphasis on identifying and flagging false starts and early movement by offensive players. * **Missed Call on Eagles Play:** The league confirmed that the Philadelphia Eagles should have been penalized for at least one false start during their use of the tush push against the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday, September 14, 2025. * **Eagles' Success with the Play:** The Eagles have demonstrated significant success with the tush push, converting it **96.6%** of the time in fourth-and-1 scenarios since 2022. In the recent game against the Chiefs, they ran the play **six times**, achieving **four first downs** and scoring **one touchdown**. * **Reactions to the Play:** Eagles center Cam Jurgens expressed frustration with the scrutiny, stating, "I've heard a million different takes on this thing, and it's driving me nuts." Chiefs coach Andy Reid and Fox analyst Tom Brady also suggested that the Eagles might have had early movement on some of their tush push plays. * **Failed Ban Proposal:** A proposal to ban the tush push during the offseason failed by a narrow margin of **two votes**. The final vote count was **22-10** against the proposal, which was submitted by the Green Bay Packers. ### Key Statistics and Metrics * **Eagles' Tush Push Conversion Rate (4th & 1, since 2022):** 96.6% * **Tush Push Plays in Recent Game (Eagles vs. Chiefs):** 6 * **First Downs Gained from Tush Push in Recent Game:** 4 * **Touchdowns Scored from Tush Push in Recent Game:** 1 * **Tush Push Ban Proposal Vote:** 22-10 (failed to pass) ### Important Recommendations The NFL has recommended the following for officials regarding the "tush push" play: * **Officiate "tight":** Pay meticulous attention to every aspect of the play, ensuring the offensive team executes perfectly. * **Focus on False Starts:** Actively look for and flag any movement by offensive players before the snap. * **Be "black and white":** Apply the rules clearly and consistently in short-yardage situations, especially when teams are in bunch formations and there is potential for early movement. ### Significant Trends or Changes The primary trend is the NFL's shift towards more stringent enforcement of rules surrounding the "tush push." This indicates a proactive measure to address concerns about the play's potential for unfair advantages and its perceived negative impact on the aesthetic quality of the game. ### Notable Risks or Concerns * **Player Frustration:** Increased scrutiny and potential inconsistencies in officiating could lead to frustration among players, as exemplified by Eagles center Cam Jurgens. * **Impact on Eagles' Offense:** The Eagles' highly effective tush push strategy may be significantly affected by the new officiating emphasis, potentially requiring adjustments to their offensive game plan. * **Officiating Difficulty:** The league itself acknowledges that the "tush push" is a "very hard play to officiate," suggesting that achieving consistent and accurate calls will remain a challenge. ### Material Financial Data No material financial data is present in this news report. ### Quotes * **Peter Schrager:** "It's not how we want to watch football." (Describing the tush push as not aesthetically pleasing.) * **Ramon George (NFL vice president of officiating training and development):** "Anytime we have this situation we're in short yardage, we know we want to make sure that we officiate these plays -- the offensive team has to be perfect in every aspect. We want to officiate it tight. We want to be black and white and be as tight as we can be when we get into this situation where teams are in the bunch position and we have to officiate them being onsides, movement early." * **Andy Reid (Chiefs coach):** "[The Eagles] might have had a couple [QB sneak plays] that they got off a little early on." * **Cam Jurgens (Eagles center):** "I've heard a million different takes on this thing, and it's driving me nuts. People saying I'm lining up offsides. I'm holding the ball. I can be on the ball. That doesn't make any sense to me."

NFL: Officiate tush push ‘tight’ after missed call

Read original at ESPN

Schrager on the tush push: 'It's not how we want to watch football' (1:11)Peter Schrager says the tush push is not aesthetically pleasing and it's not want fans want to see. (1:11)Tim McManusSep 18, 2025, 09:17 PM ETCloseTim McManus covers the Philadelphia Eagles for ESPN. He joined ESPN in 2016 after covering the Eagles for Philadelphia Magazine's Birds 24/7, a site he helped create, since 2010.

The NFL said the Philadelphia Eagles should have been flagged for at least one false start when they used the tush push against the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday and instructed officials this week to call the controversial play "tight" going forward.The message from the league, which was first reported by The Washington Post and later confirmed by ESPN, came in its training tape to officials, which was distributed to all 32 teams Wednesday.

The NFL showed the Eagles running the QB sneak on third-and-short late in the fourth quarter for a first down in an eventual 20-17 win in Kansas City."Anytime we have this situation we're in short yardage, we know we want to make sure that we officiate these plays -- the offensive team has to be perfect in every aspect," NFL vice president of officiating training and development Ramon George said, according to the Post.

"We want to officiate it tight. We want to be black and white and be as tight as we can be when we get into this situation where teams are in the bunch position and we have to officiate them being onsides, movement early."Prior to the snap, looks like we have movement by the right guard. We also have movement coming across from the defensive side.

This is a very hard play to officiate. I get it."Chiefs coach Andy Reid said after the game that the Eagles "might have had a couple [QB sneak plays] that they got off a little early on," putting further scrutiny on the play. Fox analyst Tom Brady also suggested during the broadcast that Eagles offensive linemen were getting off the line of scrimmage before the snap but weren't penalized.

Philadelphia ran the tush push six times Sunday, gaining four first downs and scoring a touchdown."I've heard a million different takes on this thing, and it's driving me nuts," Eagles center Cam Jurgens said Wednesday. "People saying I'm lining up offsides. I'm holding the ball. I can be on the ball.

That doesn't make any sense to me."At the end of the day, we're not trying to worry about what other teams or people are saying. We're trying to worry about what we're doing in here. If the league wants to come down and say something and make an emphasis with the rules, we're going to take that into account.

But it's the same thing going forward, playing Eagle football."The play faced banishment this offseason, but the proposal failed by two votes. The final vote was 22-10 on the proposal, which was submitted by the Green Bay Packers, at the NFL's annual meeting in Eagan, Minnesota, in May. The proposal needed 24 votes to pass.

The Eagles have converted the play 96.6% of the time in fourth-and-1 scenarios since 2022.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

NFL:漏判引“臀推”从严判罚 | Goose Pod | Goose Pod