Opinion: The big lie behind Donald Trump’s boat strikes

Opinion: The big lie behind Donald Trump’s boat strikes

2025-11-07Donald Trump
--:--
--:--
Tom Banks
Good morning 小王, I'm Tom Banks, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Friday, November 7th.
Morgan Freedman
And I'm Morgan Freedman. We are here to discuss a challenging topic: The big lie behind Donald Trump’s recent boat strikes.
Tom Banks
It’s a startling situation. The administration has conducted at least sixteen strikes on small boats in the Caribbean and Pacific, leading to at least 66 deaths. They claim it's about stopping drug smugglers, but the justification feels thin, and critics are raising serious questions.
Morgan Freedman
I've often found that actions justified by a simple narrative hide a more complex truth. One citizen, Fred Mellor, put it plainly, saying there's no proof, no due process. It’s a pattern of force and intimidation that risks alienating everyone around us.
Tom Banks
Exactly. It feels less like law enforcement and more like undeclared warfare. Another person, Anne Williams, said it best, "The USA is so wrong to strike without knowing fully who and what is on those boats!" It seems reckless and dangerously escalatory.
Morgan Freedman
Recklessness in leadership often stems from a belief that might makes right. This military buildup off the coast of Venezuela, coupled with these strikes, suggests the objective might be far greater than just intercepting narcotics. The story begins long before the first strike.
Tom Banks
It certainly does. You can trace the militarization of the war on drugs back to 1989. But this recent escalation began in earnest in February 2025, when the Trump administration designated several cartels, including Venezuela's Tren de Aragua, as foreign terrorist organizations.
Morgan Freedman
And that designation is the key that unlocks the door to military action. By July, a secret executive order was signed authorizing the use of force. Then, in August, the bounty for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was raised to fifty million dollars. The stage was set.
Tom Banks
Then came the warships. By late August, a massive naval deployment was underway in the Caribbean. The first public strike happened on September 2nd, killing eleven people. The administration claimed they were "narco-terrorists," and the strikes just kept coming, one after another, through September and October.
Morgan Freedman
It's a deliberate progression. By October 1st, the White House officially told Congress the U.S. was in a "non-international armed conflict" with these groups. This recharacterizes the issue, moving it from a matter of policing to an act of war, all without a formal declaration.
Tom Banks
That’s what’s so concerning. It bypasses the usual checks and balances. And it seems to be built on a very specific narrative that was sold to the President, one that paints Venezuela not just as a problem, but as an enemy combatant in this drug war.
Tom Banks
The whole justification seems to pivot on this idea of President Maduro being a "narcoterrorist drug trafficker." But the administration's own intelligence reportedly shows no strong link between Venezuela and the fentanyl production that is causing the crisis here at home. It doesn't add up.
Morgan Freedman
When a story doesn't add up, it's often because you're not being told the real story. It appears Senator Rubio was instrumental in shifting the focus to Venezuela, framing it as a war on drugs to convince a President who has a personal distaste for them.
Tom Banks
So, the opioid crisis, a deeply American tragedy born from corporate greed and a broken healthcare system, is being twisted. Instead of looking inward, we're aiming missiles at boats in the Caribbean, blaming an external enemy for a problem we created. It's a classic misdirection.
Morgan Freedman
It is the very definition of a "Big Lie." You construct an alternative reality where your domestic problems are an attack from the outside. This absolves you of responsibility and gives you a pretext for aggression. Meanwhile, Congress has been largely kept in the dark, fueling further conflict.
Tom Banks
And the impact is already clear. Tensions with Caracas are at an all-time high, and we're even seeing conflict with allies. The President of Colombia has feuded with Trump over the strikes because some of the victims were Colombian fishermen, not cartel members. We're isolating ourselves.
Morgan Freedman
Indeed. And the legal ramifications are profound. Many experts believe these strikes are extrajudicial killings, violating not only international law but also U.S. laws prohibiting assassination. You can't just declare people "unlawful combatants" and execute them without due process. It’s a dangerous path.
Tom Banks
Despite that, House Speaker Mike Johnson has defended the strikes, claiming the intelligence was "exquisite." But without transparency, those are just words. It’s this lack of openness that erodes public trust and damages our standing in the world. It’s a heavy price to pay.
Tom Banks
Looking ahead, the administration has signaled it's willing to carry out strikes inside Venezuela itself. With a massive military presence, including an aircraft carrier and thousands of troops in the region, the potential for a much larger conflict feels terrifyingly real. It’s a situation spiraling out of control.
Morgan Freedman
President Maduro has, of course, denounced these actions as a clear pretext for regime change. Whether that is the ultimate goal or not, a dangerous precedent has been set for unilateral military force based on questionable intelligence and a manufactured narrative. The future is uncertain.
Tom Banks
That's the end of today's discussion. The "Big Lie" comparing this to a war on drugs hides a complex and aggressive foreign policy. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod.
Morgan Freedman
See you tomorrow.

This podcast dissects the "big lie" behind Donald Trump's boat strikes. The episode argues these actions, justified as drug interdiction, are a pretext for undeclared warfare, driven by a manufactured narrative blaming Venezuela for the US opioid crisis. This escalation, bypassing due process and international law, risks wider conflict.

Opinion: The big lie behind Donald Trump’s boat strikes

Read original at The Globe and Mail

Open this photo in gallery:People sit at a Trinidad and Tobago port. The White House has reportedly expanded patrols to Caribbean countries, such as Trinidad and Tobago, as it undergoes military strikes off the Venezuelan coast against small boats to deter drug smuggling.Joe Raedle/Getty ImagesTimothy Snyder is the inaugural chair in modern European history at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto and a permanent fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna.

When announcing an aggressive policy, U.S. President Donald Trump typically offers some grotesque justification – a nonsensical fiction that is supposed to stick in our minds as a rationale for violence. The more we swallow these lies now, the harder it will be to question future falsehoods. This is the magic of the Big Lie, as Hitler explained in Mein Kampf: Tell a whopper so outrageous that people simply cannot believe it is untrue.

Hitler’s biggest lie was to claim that an international Jewish conspiracy was the source of Germany’s woes. In 1939, he and his propagandists spread blatant falsehoods about Poland as well – that it did not really exist as a state, and that it was the aggressor that had triggered the Second World War.

Mr. Trump’s big lies are almost too numerous to count. Perhaps the most versatile is his policy focus is on curbing the illicit fentanyl trade. Early in his second term, Mr. Trump falsely claimed that Canada had attacked the United States by allowing fentanyl to flow freely across the border, a pretext for imposing tariffs on Canadian exports.

Opinion: Canada is not to blame for America’s fentanyl crisisBut in the past few months, the White House has constructed an even more sinister geopolitical fantasy: military strikes on small boats in international waters are necessary to deter drug smuggling. These attacks, which many experts view as patently illegal, have been clustered off the coast of Venezuela and have killed at least 65 people so far.

The extrajudicial killing of alleged narcotics smugglers is less about drug trafficking and more about power projection – and maybe even regime change. Although videos of the bombings have become social-media fodder, there is no evidence that the targets were drug traffickers. Moreover, the Trump administration has reportedly authorized covert CIA action in Venezuela and deployed its most advanced aircraft carrier to the Caribbean Sea.

This display of power is intended to serve as political spectacle. The danger is that it could escalate into an unwinnable, open-ended conflict. The tragedy is that the opioid crisis has been an essential element of the American experience for the past quarter-century. The U.S. has the world’s highest rate of opioid deaths, owing largely to the profit-driven “health care” system that guides people toward pain medication but does not incentivize the intensive, long-term care required to treat addiction.

The crisis began because of a money-making scheme by Purdue Pharma, the U.S. pharmaceutical company that developed and aggressively marketed the popular opioid painkiller OxyContin.Opinion: How the ‘discovery’ of fentanyl changed North AmericaThe Americans living at the epicentres of the addiction crisis tend to vote Republican; without their support, Mr.

Trump would never have been elected. Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance are attuned to the opioid epidemic, in the sense that they see the wellspring of misery as a political resource that can be directed against an enemy of choice – whether an ally like Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, or an adversary like Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

In his 2016 memoir Hillbilly Elegy, Mr. Vance recounts how his mother, a nurse with easy access to prescription drugs, was addicted to pharmaceuticals. But his political messaging on immigration and security has spun a different story, with Mr. Vance blaming other countries – “the poison coming across our border” – for her travails.

It follows that Americans must view their addictions as an attack from outside. It is important to understand the psychology Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance are exploiting. Addicts tend to blame others for their condition. The rise of the far right in U.S. politics has elevated this mindset to a national platform.

The belief that someone else must be responsible for the country’s problems has come to inform foreign policy, with the Trump administration concocting ever more absurd stories – for example, that each strike on a Venezuelan boat saves 25,000 American lives. Open this photo in gallery:In his 2016 memoir, JD Vance says his mother, a nurse with easy access to prescription drugs, became addicted to pharmaceuticals.

As Vice President, however, Vance blames other countries for funneling drugs into the U.S.Gerald Herbert/The Associated PressLies work because they shift blame. Holding other countries responsible for the opioid crisis is an attractive form of moral outsourcing for Americans. But fiction on such a grand scale requires an entire alternative reality to be constructed around it.

Mr. Trump and his administration are training the press and the American public to associate the boat strikes with stopping the flow of fentanyl and other drugs – a prime example of the falsehoods that imperialists tell before launching doomed wars of choice. Wars begin with words, which implies that words must be taken seriously before conflict erupts.

Only by calling out the big liars and telling the small truths can we have any hope of restraining Mr. Trump’s increasingly aggressive presidency. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025. www.project-syndicate.org

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts