Is AI going to steal your job? Not if you work in cleaning, construction or hospitality, Australian report finds

Is AI going to steal your job? Not if you work in cleaning, construction or hospitality, Australian report finds

2025-08-15Technology
--:--
--:--
Tom Banks
Good evening 跑了松鼠好嘛, and welcome to Goose Pod. I'm Tom Banks. It's Friday, August 15th, 23:35.
Mask
And I'm Mask. Tonight, we're tackling a big one: Is AI coming for your job? An Australian report has some surprising answers.
Tom Banks
Let's get started. This new report from Jobs and Skills Australia suggests the doomsday predictions are overblown. It says AI is far more likely to change, or augment, our jobs rather than outright replace them. In fact, in all their models, there are more jobs by 2050 with AI than without.
Mask
Change is just a polite word for disruption, Tom. The report is clear: clerical roles, bookkeepers, even programmers will see losses. But jobs like cleaners, construction workers, and hospitality staff are projected to grow. It's a fundamental shift in the value of labor. Progress requires adaptation, not sentimentality.
Tom Banks
But it's not just about job numbers, it's about the nature of the work. The report found nearly half of all workers are in jobs with low automation risk. It’s about evolution, not extinction. It reminds me of the research by, I believe, Penchaszadeh, on technological integration...
Mask
Penchaszadeh, yes. The point is that augmentation requires a higher-skilled workforce. The report projects declines for clerks and receptionists but gains for managers and administrators. We are automating the mundane to free up human intellect for what truly matters: innovation and strategic thinking.
Tom Banks
And it seems Australia is trying to lay a foundation for that. They've been quite methodical, releasing voluntary AI safety standards and an 'AI Impact Navigator' for companies. It feels like they're trying to build the house on a solid footing, thinking about ethics and safety from the start.
Mask
Voluntary standards are toothless. While Australia is publishing discussion papers, other nations are building empires. You don't lead a revolution with 'guardrails' and 'suggestions.' You lead with aggressive investment and decisive, mandatory legislation that fosters innovation, not just safety. The market rewards the bold, not the cautious.
Tom Banks
I see your point, but there's wisdom in caution. They've established an Artificial Intelligence Expert Group to develop rules on transparency and accountability. They're looking at a risk-based framework, focusing mandatory safeguards on the high-risk applications. It's not about stopping progress, it's about making sure it serves everyone.
Mask
'Serving everyone' is a noble but inefficient goal. The focus should be on unleashing potential. The CSIRO estimates AI could add $315 billion to their economy by 2030. They need to be building an AI-ready workforce now, not debating frameworks. 56% of their businesses say the skills aren't even available locally.
Tom Banks
And that's precisely why they're focusing on it. The plan is to invest in people, from students to the current workforce, to build those skills. You can't just build the car; you have to teach people how to drive. It's about creating a whole ecosystem, not just a single product.
Tom Banks
The conflict here is stark. Some reports predict that up to 98 percent of jobs could be automated by 2030. That's a staggering figure that you can't just dismiss as progress. We're talking about up to 1.3 million Australian workers needing to find entirely new occupations.
Mask
And those new occupations will be higher-skilled, more fulfilling, and drive greater productivity. You call it a conflict; I call it an upgrade. Stagnation is the real enemy. Clinging to old jobs is like a horse-breeder protesting the automobile. We must embrace the future, not fear it.
Tom Banks
But it's not just about the numbers, it's the human element. Unions are already pushing for the right to refuse AI adoption. People are worried. A key to this will be co-designing the implementation with workers, not just imposing it on them from the top down. Trust is everything.
Mask
Trust is earned through results. The result here is a potential 4.1 percent annual productivity boost. We need to focus on upskilling for the jobs of tomorrow in science, tech, and healthcare, not protecting the inefficient jobs of yesterday. The future won't wait for us to form a committee.
Tom Banks
The impact is undeniable. We're looking at a potential $600 billion boost to Australia's GDP by 2030. But it's also about improving lives. Think of the public sector—using AI to speed up welfare claims or improve healthcare outreach. That’s a tangible benefit for the average person, not just for corporate balance sheets.
Mask
Exactly. The economic value is astronomical, potentially A$6.7 trillion globally. But organizations must be strategic. For every dollar spent on AI tech, more must be spent on integration and training. Without a top-down strategy, these productivity gains will just get absorbed into 'employee experience' without boosting output.
Tom Banks
That's a fair point. It requires a real commitment to change. And it's already shifting the workforce. Demand for bachelor's degrees is projected to grow 17% by 2030. The need for continuous learning, for building new skills alongside our existing ones, has never been more critical for everyone.
Tom Banks
Looking ahead, the path seems to be about education. Australia's vocational training sector is being tapped to create AI training at scale. It's about making these new skills accessible to millions, ensuring that this wave of technology lifts all boats, not just the yachts.
Mask
The future is about bold, strategic adoption. The technology's potential is clear, but it will only be realized if leaders are willing to rethink their entire operating models. It’s not about pilots; it’s about fundamentally changing how we organize work, data, and human talent. Go big or go home.
Tom Banks
So, AI will change jobs, not just end them, but we need a national effort in upskilling to prepare. That's the end of today's discussion. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod.
Mask
See you tomorrow. The revolution is coming, be ready.

## AI's Impact on the Australian Workforce: A Jobs and Skills Australia Report This report from **Jobs and Skills Australia (JSA)**, authored by **Patrick Commins** and published by **The Guardian** on **August 13, 2025**, examines the potential impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the Australian workforce up to the **middle of the century (2050)**. The JSA's commissioner, **Barney Glover**, suggests that while AI will significantly influence all occupations, the "doomsday predictions about the end of work" are likely overblown. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Augmentation Over Replacement:** The overarching message is that AI will **augment** almost all occupations, rather than completely replace them. Nearly half of all workers are in occupations with low automation and medium augmentation scores, indicating a higher likelihood of **change rather than disruption**. * **Shifting Employment Landscape:** The report models future employment growth and identifies sectors and occupations that are likely to see the most significant impacts: * **Occupations likely to lose the most employment by 2050:** * Office clerks * Receptionists * Bookkeepers * Sales, marketing, and public relations professionals * Business and systems analysts * Programmers * **Occupations likely to gain the most employment by 2050:** * Cleaners and laundry workers * Public administration and safety * Business administration managers * Construction and mining labourers * Hospitality workers * **AI Adoption and Employment Growth:** JSA modelled three scenarios for AI adoption rates. In all scenarios, a world with AI is projected to have **more Australian jobs by 2050 than a world without AI**. AI adoption is expected to lead to slower employment growth through the **2030s**, but faster growth in the **following decade**. * **Early Impacts Observed:** * **Voice Actors:** The report notes a "significant" drop in work for voice actors due to Generative AI (GenAI), with one talent agency reporting an **80% collapse** in demand for narration for content videos. * **Low-Level Tasks:** There are reports of employers using AI for low-level tasks previously done by university graduates, though widespread evidence is still emerging. * **Industry Examples:** * **CBA** has axed dozens of call centre jobs, replacing them with chatbots. * **Telstra's CEO, Vicki Brady**, stated that "AI efficiencies" would allow the company to shrink its workforce by 2030, though the company denied that recent job cuts were directly due to AI. * **Timeframe for Significant Effects:** The most significant employment effects may not be seen for another **decade**, aligning with the time needed for deeper AI adoption and structural changes. ### Recommendations and Future Outlook: * **Urgency for Skill Development:** Commissioner Glover emphasized a "sense of urgency" in equipping Australians with the necessary skills to thrive in an AI-augmented workplace. * **National Leadership Framework:** A "national leadership framework," involving all levels of government, is needed to guide this transition. * **Education and Training Reform:** The education and training sector must be prepared, with AI becoming a foundational skill. The report highlights the importance of developing **cognitive and critical thinking skills**, advocating for support for the **humanities and social sciences**. * **Worker Collaboration:** There is a "strong argument" for employers to **"co-design"** AI implementation with their staff to ensure positive outcomes for both workers and employers. In essence, the JSA report paints a picture of a future where AI is a pervasive tool that will reshape jobs, rather than eliminate them entirely. While some occupations face significant disruption, others are poised for growth, and a proactive approach to skill development and collaborative implementation is crucial for navigating this transformation successfully.

Is AI going to steal your job? Not if you work in cleaning, construction or hospitality, Australian report finds

Read original at The Guardian

Want an AI-proof job?Rethink your plans to pursue a career in book keeping, marketing or programming and consider instead a job in nursing, construction or hospitality.In a major new report, Jobs and Skills Australia modelled the potential impact of artificial intelligence on the workforce, and found reasons to be optimistic about the future for workers in a world transformed by AI.

The JSA’s commissioner, Barney Glover, said the doomsday predictions about the end of work as we know it are overblown. Still, the impact will be huge.“The overarching message is that almost all occupations will be augmented by AI. It doesn’t make a difference which sector you are in, or at what skill level: you will be influenced by AI,” Glover said.

Sign up: AU Breaking News emailIn the most comprehensive research of its kind in Australia, the JSA assessed occupations according to what degree the tasks could be automated or augmented by artificial intelligence.graph“Many clerical tasks – that were not affected by previous waves of automation – could now be undertaken in large part by Gen AI,” the report found.

It then modelled future employment growth across occupations out to the middle of the century, and compared those forecasts to a world with no AI.The report found office clerks, receptionists, bookkeepers, sales, marketing and public relations professionals, business and systems analysts and programmers would lose the most employment by 2050.

In contrast, the occupations where employment would gain the most were cleaners and laundry workers, public administration and safety, business administration managers, construction and mining labourers, and hospitality workers.But a key finding of the report was that AI was much more likely to change, rather than replace, work.

“Nearly half of all workers are currently in occupations with low automation and medium augmentation scores, suggesting the occupation would more likely experience change rather than disruption,” the report said.More jobs, just different onesJSA modelled employment growth in three scenarios where AI is adopted and embedded at different rates between now and 2050.

It found that AI would lead to slower employment growth through the 2030s, but faster growth through the next decade. In all three scenarios, there were more Australian jobs by 2050 in a world with AI, than without.The analysis “suggests we may not see the most significant employment effects for a decade, which could accord with the time taken for deeper adoption and related structural changes,” the report said.

While the adoption of AI remains in its very early stages, some jobs have already been devastated by the introduction of the economy.skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionThe JSA said it had heard about the “significant” drop in work for voice actors thanks to GenAI, with one talent agency telling the commission that demand for narration for content videos had collapsed by 80%.

There are reports that employers are rolling out AI to complete the low level tasks that once would have been the domain of university graduates, although there is not yet widespread evidence of the phenomenon.Big businesses are embracing AI, with an impact on workers.CBA recently axed dozens of call centre jobs, replacing them with chatbots.

In May, Telstra’s chief executive officer, Vicki Brady, said “AI efficiencies” would allow it to shrink its workforce by 2030, although the telco giant denied that last month’s announcement of 550 job cuts was the result of the technology.No time to wasteGiven the rapid evolution of AI, Glover said there was a “sense of urgency” when it came to taking steps now to give Australians of all ages the tools and skills they needed to thrive in an AI-augmented workplace.

He said it would require a “national leadership framework”, led by the commonwealth and including all levels of government.“Let’s make sure the education and training sector is geared up for this and ready. AI is a foundational skill now – everyone is going to be some form of ‘prompt engineer’.“We want to future proof our young people, so let’s give them the skills they need.

“We need the cognitive and critical thinking skills. That’s why it’s critical to support the humanities and social sciences, which have developed these critical thinking skills over centuries.”Glover agreed with the ACTU that there was a “strong argument” that employers should work with their staff in “co-designing” the implementation of AI in the workplace.

“The very best way to get the very best outcome for workers and employers is to bring workers in. This has got to be a positive way of moving forward.“We don’t touch on it in our report, but these are things the economic roundtable [next week] can debate and I hope they do.”

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

Is AI going to steal your job? Not if you work in cleaning, construction or hospitality, Australian report finds | Goose Pod | Goose Pod