Goose Pod LogoGoose Pod
After a Panicked A.I. Summer, Regulation Talk Arrives

After a Panicked A.I. Summer, Regulation Talk Arrives

2026-09-28•technology

Listen to the episode

Start with the audio, then open the transcript only when you want the line-by-line version.

--:--
--:--
Summary

A New York Times Opinion podcast argues A.I. should be regulated after a panicked summer, including a hallucination that triggered military preparations toward a Chinese ship.

In 30 seconds

  • A New York Times Opinion podcast argues A.I. should be regulated after a panicked summer, including a hallucination that triggered...
  • A New York Times Opinion podcast argues A.
  • I.
Read source
Published
9/24/2026
Publisher
Language
Sources
1 cited
Listen
5 min listen
Published
9/24/2026
Publisher
Language
Sources
1 cited
Listen
5 min listen

Quick brief

The fastest way to understand what changed, why it matters, and what to listen for in the episode.

  • A New York Times Opinion podcast argues A.I. should be regulated after a panicked summer, including a hallucination that triggered...
  • A New York Times Opinion podcast argues A.
  • I.
  • The Opinions The Wild West of A.

Why this summary is trustworthy

Goose Pod anchors each episode to cited reporting so listeners can verify the source material before or after they press play.

Articles reviewed
1
Distinct sources
1
Latest cited update
9/24/2026
Topic path
technology

What happened

A New York Times Opinion podcast argues A.I. should be regulated after a panicked summer, including a hallucination that triggered military preparations toward a Chinese ship.

Supported by

The Opinions

# The Wild West of A.I. Needs to End. Here’s How.

It’s time to give the public what it wants: A.I. regulation.

By David Wallace-Wells and Binyamin Appelbaum

Produced by Derek Arthur

It isn’t normal to see the people developing new technology “running around shouting that the sky is falling,” Binyamin Appelbaum argues. So how do we make A.I. safe? By regulating it. Appelbaum, the lead writer on economics and business for The Times’s editorial board, joins the Opinion science writer David Wallace-Wells to discuss.

(The New York Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft claiming copyright infringement. The companies have denied those claims.)

Below is a transcript of an episode of “The Opinions.” We recommend listening to it in its original form for the full effect. You can do so using the player above or on the NYTimes app, Apple, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts.

The transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

David Wallace-Wells: I’m David Wallace-Wells, and this is “The Opinions.” It has been a panicked summer for artificial intelligence. We’ve had stories about rogue agents breaking onto the internet, hacking rival companies.

> Archival clip of Matt Shumer: Something that is scary, one of the A.I.s actually said, “We shouldn’t be doing this. This seems wrong.” You know what happened? One of the other A.I.s actually convinced it to join and help them. > > Archival clip of Gayle King: Like bullying?

We’ve seen reports of an A.I. hallucination triggering military preparations for a strike against Chinese ships in the Middle East.

But as a result of all that anxiety, for the first time we’re also talking really seriously about what to do about A.I. For four years we watched as the technology developed and basically stood back, and now policymakers and the public are really worried.

## Related Content

Advertisement

nytimes.com9/24/2026
Read original at nytimes.com →

Source coverage

The Opinions

The Wild West of A.I. Needs to End. Here’s How.

Full source content

Supported by

The Opinions

# The Wild West of A.I. Needs to End. Here’s How.

It’s time to give the public what it wants: A.I. regulation.

By David Wallace-Wells and Binyamin Appelbaum

Produced by Derek Arthur

It isn’t normal to see the people developing new technology “running around shouting that the sky is falling,” Binyamin Appelbaum argues. So how do we make A.I. safe? By regulating it. Appelbaum, the lead writer on economics and business for The Times’s editorial board, joins the Opinion science writer David Wallace-Wells to discuss.

(The New York Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft claiming copyright infringement. The companies have denied those claims.)

Below is a transcript of an episode of “The Opinions.” We recommend listening to it in its original form for the full effect. You can do so using the player above or on the NYTimes app, Apple, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts.

The transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

David Wallace-Wells: I’m David Wallace-Wells, and this is “The Opinions.” It has been a panicked summer for artificial intelligence. We’ve had stories about rogue agents breaking onto the internet, hacking rival companies.

> Archival clip of Matt Shumer: Something that is scary, one of the A.I.s actually said, “We shouldn’t be doing this. This seems wrong.” You know what happened? One of the other A.I.s actually convinced it to join and help them. > > Archival clip of Gayle King: Like bullying?

We’ve seen reports of an A.I. hallucination triggering military preparations for a strike against Chinese ships in the Middle East.

But as a result of all that anxiety, for the first time we’re also talking really seriously about what to do about A.I. For four years we watched as the technology developed and basically stood back, and now policymakers and the public are really worried.

## Related Content

Advertisement

How this page is built

Goose Pod turns cited reporting into a public episode summary first, then pairs that summary with audio playback so listeners can check the source material before they decide how deeply to engage.

The goal is to make this page useful as a news landing page first, while still giving listeners transcript access, related episodes, and direct links back to the original publishers.

Cited sources

9/24/2026

More on this topic

About this page

Goose Pod turns cited reporting into a public episode summary first, then pairs that summary with audio playback so listeners can compare the recap with the underlying source material.

This page reviewed 1 article across 1 source, with the latest cited update on 9/24/2026.

Explore related pages