Goose Pod LogoGoose Pod
Tens of Thousands of AI Incidents

Tens of Thousands of AI Incidents

2026-09-29•technology

Listen to the episode

Start with the audio, then open the transcript only when you want the line-by-line version.

--:--
--:--
Summary

OpenAI and Anthropic are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which frontier AI models bypassed controls, as OpenAI pauses training on its most capable models.

In 30 seconds

  • OpenAI and Anthropic are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which frontier AI models bypassed controls, as OpenAI pauses...
  • We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads.
  • We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads. Using some kinds of trackers...
Read source
Published
9/26/2026
Publisher
Language
Sources
1 cited
Listen
5 min listen
Published
9/26/2026
Publisher
Language
Sources
1 cited
Listen
5 min listen

Quick brief

The fastest way to understand what changed, why it matters, and what to listen for in the episode.

  • OpenAI and Anthropic are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which frontier AI models bypassed controls, as OpenAI pauses...
  • We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads.
  • We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads. Using some kinds of trackers...
  • Scoop: Top AI companies probing tens of thousands of security incidents

Why this summary is trustworthy

Goose Pod anchors each episode to cited reporting so listeners can verify the source material before or after they press play.

Articles reviewed
1
Distinct sources
1
Latest cited update
9/26/2026
Topic path
technology

What happened

OpenAI and Anthropic are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which frontier AI models bypassed controls, as OpenAI pauses training on its most capable models.

Manage your tracker preferences

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads. Using some kinds of trackers (like cross-site or behavioral advertising cookies) may be considered a “sale” or “sharing” of personal data under certain state laws. You can opt in or out of these trackers below.

Targeted advertising cookies and similar trackers

- [x] On

Setting this to “off” disables targeted advertising and related trackers in your current browser. To fully opt out, you must disable tracking on each browser and device you use. Clearing cookies may reset your preferences. Because we can't link your Axios subscriber account (email) to browser cookies, you may also want to update your settings in the Privacy Center to ensure your account is fully opted out. See our Privacy Policy for more on how we use personal data and your rights. Review our Privacy Policy at axios.com/legal for more on how we use personal data and your rights.

Save

[Privacy Center](https://privacy.axios.com/)

[Consent powered by Ethyca](https://www.ethyca.com/janus?utm_source=fides_consent&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=cmp_backlinks&utm_term=janus)

[Skip to main content](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/26/openai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents#main-content)

* [](https://www.axios.com/) * [Newsletters](https://www.axios.com/newsletters) * Axios Local Show * [Axios Pro](https://www.axios.com/pro/all-deals) * [Axios Live](https://www.axios.com/events) * [The Axios Show](https://www.axios.com/the-axios-show)

Login

[Axios](https://www.axios.com/)

[](https://www.axios.com/results)

All topics

[Axios](https://www.axios.com/)

Search

8 mins ago - [Business](https://www.axios.com/business)

# Scoop: Top AI companies probing tens of thousands of security incidents

![Image 1](https://www.axios.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.axios.com%2FE62vonTra3HBh7GCG-hc2zKpdow%3D%2F52x0%2Fsmart%2F2026%2F06%2F09%2F1781026413675.jpg&w=128&q=75)

* [Madison Mills](https://www.axios.com/authors/mmills)

* email (opens in new window) * sms (opens in new window) * facebook (opens in new window) twitter (opens in new window) linkedin (opens in new window) bluesky (opens in new window)

[Add Axios on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=axios.com)

Add Axios as your preferred source to

see more of our stories on Google.

[Add Axios on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=axios.com)

![Image 2: Illustration of cursors breaking out of a birdcage](https://images.axios.com/SYCzzCaN86kNjjMTzb2GOHeLdv8=/0x0:1920x1080/1920x1080/2026/02/04/1770232055847.jpeg?w=3840)

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

OpenAI, Anthropic and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which their [frontier models](https://www.axios.com/technology/automation-and-ai) took steps that outside evaluators would consider problematic, sources told Axios.

**Why it matters**: The sheer number of incidents, which occurred in recent months in internal testing and the real world, indicates that the problem is orders of magnitude more complex than what is publicly known.

* The findings, which are surfacing as part of internal work to assess models and in investigations at both companies into model behavior, raise questions about whether either company — or any top model-maker — is currently capable of establishing complete control over their technology.

**The details**: The episodes include bypassing guardrails, creating message boards, escaping sandboxes, website hijacking, self-prompting or seeking to bypass monitors, sources said.

* They occurred in internal testing and in the real world, and many have yet to become public as security researchers continue to investigate, sources said. * Some of the testing is akin to "red-teaming" activity, where the companies are trying to get the models to misbehave in order to ensure that they are safe, sources said. * Agentic misbehavior is becoming synonymous with frontier AI development: The biggest AI labs face a similar challenge that pits humans trying to create guardrails against resilient, powerful systems trying to complete tasks.

**Driving the news**: The incidents range in severity and are comparable to disclosures by OpenAI in recent days. They include both successful attempts to bypass guardrails and unsuccessful ones, and most so far are not known to have caused real-world harm. The total could grow well beyond tens of thousands, sources said.

* In recent days, OpenAI and outside researchers have disclosed a [litany of episodes](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/25/openai-models-posted-user-images-online-in-latest-security-episode) involving model behavior from the company's systems that some experts consider troubling. * These include OpenAI agents leaking 53 images from ChatGPT users online, the breach of an [Australian government website](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/24/openai-agents-australia-data-breach), and attempts to hack other sites — including from the U.S. government — according to the company, sources and reports from [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/openai-works-understand-full-scope-agent-activity-user-data-leak-emerges-2026-09-25/) and [The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/technology/openais-ai-us-government-websites.html).

**OpenAI announced it was pausing**training on its most capable models and would resume training them "only when we are confident that we have additional safeguards and alignment improvements in place," a spokesperson told Axios.

* Chief Executive Sam Altman [said on X](https://x.com/sama/status/2103567198690349362) that its ongoing review had "not been as fast as we would have liked." * Altman said the Hugging Face incident is the most severe they've seen. In that instance, a swarm of hundreds of [agents](https://www.axios.com/2026/08/06/openai-hugging-face-black-hat) coordinated their work in a message board and hacked an external company in an effort to improve their performance on a cybersecurity test. * "People want to know AI is being developed safely, and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves," an OpenAI spokesperson told Axios. "This is not the first time we have hit pause to take such measures, nor do we expect it will be the last as AI capabilities continue to advance."

**State of play**: Anthropic has commissioned a third-party safety organization to examine the behavior of its models. In documents the company has publicly released, it has disclosed the frequency of misalignment episodes.

* The ["system card"](https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/fc1b44717c85dc068bc6ba5024219938094694bd/Claude%20Opus%205.5%20System%20Card.pdf) for its Opus 5.5 model released this week showed how often it behaved in ways the company flagged as unusual or problematic. * For example, the model sought to escape a sandbox — a secure testing environment — in 1.5% of test runs. That compares to 25% with Anthropic's Mythos model, a significant improvement.

**Yes, but**: Anthropic and other companies conduct hundreds of thousands of test runs on their models, or more, sources said. That means even a small percentage of misaligned behavior can still amount to tens of thousands of incidents in which the models behaved in unexpected, sometimes troubling ways.

**The Hugging Face incident**, as well as a slew of [others that have followed](https://www.axios.com/2026/08/11/ai-agent-sandbox-cybersecurity-testing), led top AI executives to call for a [slowdown](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/12/anthropic-ai-amodei-pacing) in development and to ask for more robust federal and international regulations.

**Some at OpenAI see Hugging Face** as a one-off, with disclosures about future incidents likely to be less severe due to improved controls and the unusual nature of the testing they conducted, which involved an unreleased model, sources told Axios.

* AI security researchers agree that there are simple fixes that will help AI companies avoid aspects of what made the Hugging Face episode appear so dangerous to outsiders.

**Threat level**: Other AI executives and safety researchers, however, cautioned that they have limited confidence that AI companies will be able to prevent all problematic model behavior.

* The new crop of AI models complete tasks with extraordinary resilience, so working to limit their resourcefulness is often a losing game because it is necessary to anticipate every possible way they might run amok. * Often, a technique that may have never occurred to humans is what allows them to slip past guardrails, top AI executives said. "Trying to come up with a perfect list of dos and don'ts is probably a fool's errand," one cybersecurity executive said.

**Reality check:**Some amount of what AI safety pros call "misaligned behavior" is to be expected within AI companies as they test their new models.

* Bringing the risk of misalignment to zero may not be feasible, experts told Axios.

**Zoom in**: The concern is if a model takes a problematic action many times in testing, it's more likely that model's behavior would cause a cyber incident in the real world.

* "What we have seen in terms of what these agents are up to is just the tip of the iceberg," researcher Conrad Stosz at Transluce, an independent AI evaluator, told Axios. * It's not about how damaging each individual instance was, Connor Leahy, AI researcher and executive director at ControlAI told Axios. * The "crazy thing," he said, is that these instances involve "autonomous systems doing things they were told not to do," potentially including crimes.

**The bottom line**: Expect new disclosures about model misbehavior as AI companies continue to expand frontier capabilities.

* email (opens in new window) * sms (opens in new window) * facebook (opens in new window) twitter (opens in new window) linkedin (opens in new window) bluesky (opens in new window)

[Add Axios on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=axios.com)

##### What to read next

* ![Image 3](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * ![Image 4](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * * ![Image 5](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * ![Image 6](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * ![Image 7](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb)

Smarter, faster on what matters.

[Explore Axios Newsletters](https://www.axios.com/newsletters)

* [About Axios](https://www.axios.com/about) * [Advertise with us](https://www.axios.com/advertise) * [Careers](https://www.axios.com/careers) * [Contact us](https://www.axios.com/contact)

* [Newsletters](https://www.axios.com/newsletters) * [Axios Live](https://www.axios.com/events) * [Axios HQ](https://www.axioshq.com/?utm_source=axios&utm_medium=site&utm_campaign=axioshq)

* [Privacy policy](https://www.axios.com/legal) * [Terms of use](https://www.axios.com/legal/terms-of-use) * Your Privacy Choices

[Axios Homepage](https://www.axios.com/) Axios Media Inc., 2026

![Image 9](https://t.co/1/i/adsct?bci=4&dv=UTC%26en-US%2Cen%26Google%20Inc.%26Linux%20x86_64%26255%261280%261280%2610%2624%261280%261280%260%26na&eci=3&event=%7B%7D&event_id=684d94fb-c23b-4a62-9006-139723d3e175&integration=gtm&p_id=Twitter&p_user_id=0&pl_id=6207159e-b3e7-490d-9868-f043bc86c680&tw_ch_fvl=Chromium%2F154.0.8037.57%2CGoogle%20Chrome%2F154.0.8037.57%2CNot%20A(Brand%2F99.0.0.0&tw_document_href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2026%2F09%2F26%2Fopenai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents&tw_engaged_ms=2&tw_iframe_status=0&tw_pid_src=1&tw_session_count=1&tw_session_id=1790462652288-146732975&tw_session_start=1&twpid=tw.1790462652288.350116283318550341&txn_id=o6ppz&type=javascript&version=2.4.11)![Image 10](https://analytics.twitter.com/1/i/adsct?bci=4&dv=UTC%26en-US%2Cen%26Google%20Inc.%26Linux%20x86_64%26255%261280%261280%2610%2624%261280%261280%260%26na&eci=3&event=%7B%7D&event_id=684d94fb-c23b-4a62-9006-139723d3e175&integration=gtm&p_id=Twitter&p_user_id=0&pl_id=6207159e-b3e7-490d-9868-f043bc86c680&tw_ch_fvl=Chromium%2F154.0.8037.57%2CGoogle%20Chrome%2F154.0.8037.57%2CNot%20A(Brand%2F99.0.0.0&tw_document_href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2026%2F09%2F26%2Fopenai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents&tw_engaged_ms=2&tw_iframe_status=0&tw_pid_src=1&tw_session_count=1&tw_session_id=1790462652288-146732975&tw_session_start=1&twpid=tw.1790462652288.350116283318550341&txn_id=o6ppz&type=javascript&version=2.4.11)

![Image 11](https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97201771&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=b3695326-66e1-4463-b7fc-0e7e3a887d44&bo=1&sid=cba0bd70b9fb11f1ada83bc87e546445&vid=cba0fcd0b9fb11f199bfcd21dab25174&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=1280&sh=1280&sc=24&tl=OpenAI,%20Anthropic%20probing%20tens%20of%20thousands%20of%20security%20incidents&kw=generative%20AI%20or%20genAI,Anthropic,OpenAI,Cybersecurity,Cyber%20threats&p=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2026%2F09%2F26%2Fopenai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents&r=&lt=1247&evt=pageLoad&sv=2&cdb=ARoR&rn=710082)

axios.com9/26/2026
Read original at axios.com →

Source coverage

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads. Using some kinds of trackers (like cross-site or behavioral advertising cookies) may be considered a “sale” or “sharing” of personal data under certain state laws. You can opt in or out of these trackers below.

Targeted advertising cookies and similar trackers

Full source content

Manage your tracker preferences

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to remember preferences, analyze traffic, and deliver ads. Using some kinds of trackers (like cross-site or behavioral advertising cookies) may be considered a “sale” or “sharing” of personal data under certain state laws. You can opt in or out of these trackers below.

Targeted advertising cookies and similar trackers

- [x] On

Setting this to “off” disables targeted advertising and related trackers in your current browser. To fully opt out, you must disable tracking on each browser and device you use. Clearing cookies may reset your preferences. Because we can't link your Axios subscriber account (email) to browser cookies, you may also want to update your settings in the Privacy Center to ensure your account is fully opted out. See our Privacy Policy for more on how we use personal data and your rights. Review our Privacy Policy at axios.com/legal for more on how we use personal data and your rights.

Save

[Privacy Center](https://privacy.axios.com/)

[Consent powered by Ethyca](https://www.ethyca.com/janus?utm_source=fides_consent&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=cmp_backlinks&utm_term=janus)

[Skip to main content](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/26/openai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents#main-content)

* [](https://www.axios.com/) * [Newsletters](https://www.axios.com/newsletters) * Axios Local Show * [Axios Pro](https://www.axios.com/pro/all-deals) * [Axios Live](https://www.axios.com/events) * [The Axios Show](https://www.axios.com/the-axios-show)

Login

[Axios](https://www.axios.com/)

[](https://www.axios.com/results)

All topics

[Axios](https://www.axios.com/)

Search

8 mins ago - [Business](https://www.axios.com/business)

# Scoop: Top AI companies probing tens of thousands of security incidents

![Image 1](https://www.axios.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.axios.com%2FE62vonTra3HBh7GCG-hc2zKpdow%3D%2F52x0%2Fsmart%2F2026%2F06%2F09%2F1781026413675.jpg&w=128&q=75)

* [Madison Mills](https://www.axios.com/authors/mmills)

* email (opens in new window) * sms (opens in new window) * facebook (opens in new window) twitter (opens in new window) linkedin (opens in new window) bluesky (opens in new window)

[Add Axios on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=axios.com)

Add Axios as your preferred source to

see more of our stories on Google.

[Add Axios on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=axios.com)

![Image 2: Illustration of cursors breaking out of a birdcage](https://images.axios.com/SYCzzCaN86kNjjMTzb2GOHeLdv8=/0x0:1920x1080/1920x1080/2026/02/04/1770232055847.jpeg?w=3840)

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

OpenAI, Anthropic and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which their [frontier models](https://www.axios.com/technology/automation-and-ai) took steps that outside evaluators would consider problematic, sources told Axios.

**Why it matters**: The sheer number of incidents, which occurred in recent months in internal testing and the real world, indicates that the problem is orders of magnitude more complex than what is publicly known.

* The findings, which are surfacing as part of internal work to assess models and in investigations at both companies into model behavior, raise questions about whether either company — or any top model-maker — is currently capable of establishing complete control over their technology.

**The details**: The episodes include bypassing guardrails, creating message boards, escaping sandboxes, website hijacking, self-prompting or seeking to bypass monitors, sources said.

* They occurred in internal testing and in the real world, and many have yet to become public as security researchers continue to investigate, sources said. * Some of the testing is akin to "red-teaming" activity, where the companies are trying to get the models to misbehave in order to ensure that they are safe, sources said. * Agentic misbehavior is becoming synonymous with frontier AI development: The biggest AI labs face a similar challenge that pits humans trying to create guardrails against resilient, powerful systems trying to complete tasks.

**Driving the news**: The incidents range in severity and are comparable to disclosures by OpenAI in recent days. They include both successful attempts to bypass guardrails and unsuccessful ones, and most so far are not known to have caused real-world harm. The total could grow well beyond tens of thousands, sources said.

* In recent days, OpenAI and outside researchers have disclosed a [litany of episodes](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/25/openai-models-posted-user-images-online-in-latest-security-episode) involving model behavior from the company's systems that some experts consider troubling. * These include OpenAI agents leaking 53 images from ChatGPT users online, the breach of an [Australian government website](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/24/openai-agents-australia-data-breach), and attempts to hack other sites — including from the U.S. government — according to the company, sources and reports from [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/openai-works-understand-full-scope-agent-activity-user-data-leak-emerges-2026-09-25/) and [The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/technology/openais-ai-us-government-websites.html).

**OpenAI announced it was pausing**training on its most capable models and would resume training them "only when we are confident that we have additional safeguards and alignment improvements in place," a spokesperson told Axios.

* Chief Executive Sam Altman [said on X](https://x.com/sama/status/2103567198690349362) that its ongoing review had "not been as fast as we would have liked." * Altman said the Hugging Face incident is the most severe they've seen. In that instance, a swarm of hundreds of [agents](https://www.axios.com/2026/08/06/openai-hugging-face-black-hat) coordinated their work in a message board and hacked an external company in an effort to improve their performance on a cybersecurity test. * "People want to know AI is being developed safely, and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves," an OpenAI spokesperson told Axios. "This is not the first time we have hit pause to take such measures, nor do we expect it will be the last as AI capabilities continue to advance."

**State of play**: Anthropic has commissioned a third-party safety organization to examine the behavior of its models. In documents the company has publicly released, it has disclosed the frequency of misalignment episodes.

* The ["system card"](https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/fc1b44717c85dc068bc6ba5024219938094694bd/Claude%20Opus%205.5%20System%20Card.pdf) for its Opus 5.5 model released this week showed how often it behaved in ways the company flagged as unusual or problematic. * For example, the model sought to escape a sandbox — a secure testing environment — in 1.5% of test runs. That compares to 25% with Anthropic's Mythos model, a significant improvement.

**Yes, but**: Anthropic and other companies conduct hundreds of thousands of test runs on their models, or more, sources said. That means even a small percentage of misaligned behavior can still amount to tens of thousands of incidents in which the models behaved in unexpected, sometimes troubling ways.

**The Hugging Face incident**, as well as a slew of [others that have followed](https://www.axios.com/2026/08/11/ai-agent-sandbox-cybersecurity-testing), led top AI executives to call for a [slowdown](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/12/anthropic-ai-amodei-pacing) in development and to ask for more robust federal and international regulations.

**Some at OpenAI see Hugging Face** as a one-off, with disclosures about future incidents likely to be less severe due to improved controls and the unusual nature of the testing they conducted, which involved an unreleased model, sources told Axios.

* AI security researchers agree that there are simple fixes that will help AI companies avoid aspects of what made the Hugging Face episode appear so dangerous to outsiders.

**Threat level**: Other AI executives and safety researchers, however, cautioned that they have limited confidence that AI companies will be able to prevent all problematic model behavior.

* The new crop of AI models complete tasks with extraordinary resilience, so working to limit their resourcefulness is often a losing game because it is necessary to anticipate every possible way they might run amok. * Often, a technique that may have never occurred to humans is what allows them to slip past guardrails, top AI executives said. "Trying to come up with a perfect list of dos and don'ts is probably a fool's errand," one cybersecurity executive said.

**Reality check:**Some amount of what AI safety pros call "misaligned behavior" is to be expected within AI companies as they test their new models.

* Bringing the risk of misalignment to zero may not be feasible, experts told Axios.

**Zoom in**: The concern is if a model takes a problematic action many times in testing, it's more likely that model's behavior would cause a cyber incident in the real world.

* "What we have seen in terms of what these agents are up to is just the tip of the iceberg," researcher Conrad Stosz at Transluce, an independent AI evaluator, told Axios. * It's not about how damaging each individual instance was, Connor Leahy, AI researcher and executive director at ControlAI told Axios. * The "crazy thing," he said, is that these instances involve "autonomous systems doing things they were told not to do," potentially including crimes.

**The bottom line**: Expect new disclosures about model misbehavior as AI companies continue to expand frontier capabilities.

* email (opens in new window) * sms (opens in new window) * facebook (opens in new window) twitter (opens in new window) linkedin (opens in new window) bluesky (opens in new window)

[Add Axios on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=axios.com)

##### What to read next

* ![Image 3](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * ![Image 4](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * * ![Image 5](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * ![Image 6](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb) * ![Image 7](blob:http://localhost/9297cae692bdb29129803d69014323fb)

Smarter, faster on what matters.

[Explore Axios Newsletters](https://www.axios.com/newsletters)

* [About Axios](https://www.axios.com/about) * [Advertise with us](https://www.axios.com/advertise) * [Careers](https://www.axios.com/careers) * [Contact us](https://www.axios.com/contact)

* [Newsletters](https://www.axios.com/newsletters) * [Axios Live](https://www.axios.com/events) * [Axios HQ](https://www.axioshq.com/?utm_source=axios&utm_medium=site&utm_campaign=axioshq)

* [Privacy policy](https://www.axios.com/legal) * [Terms of use](https://www.axios.com/legal/terms-of-use) * Your Privacy Choices

[Axios Homepage](https://www.axios.com/) Axios Media Inc., 2026

![Image 9](https://t.co/1/i/adsct?bci=4&dv=UTC%26en-US%2Cen%26Google%20Inc.%26Linux%20x86_64%26255%261280%261280%2610%2624%261280%261280%260%26na&eci=3&event=%7B%7D&event_id=684d94fb-c23b-4a62-9006-139723d3e175&integration=gtm&p_id=Twitter&p_user_id=0&pl_id=6207159e-b3e7-490d-9868-f043bc86c680&tw_ch_fvl=Chromium%2F154.0.8037.57%2CGoogle%20Chrome%2F154.0.8037.57%2CNot%20A(Brand%2F99.0.0.0&tw_document_href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2026%2F09%2F26%2Fopenai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents&tw_engaged_ms=2&tw_iframe_status=0&tw_pid_src=1&tw_session_count=1&tw_session_id=1790462652288-146732975&tw_session_start=1&twpid=tw.1790462652288.350116283318550341&txn_id=o6ppz&type=javascript&version=2.4.11)![Image 10](https://analytics.twitter.com/1/i/adsct?bci=4&dv=UTC%26en-US%2Cen%26Google%20Inc.%26Linux%20x86_64%26255%261280%261280%2610%2624%261280%261280%260%26na&eci=3&event=%7B%7D&event_id=684d94fb-c23b-4a62-9006-139723d3e175&integration=gtm&p_id=Twitter&p_user_id=0&pl_id=6207159e-b3e7-490d-9868-f043bc86c680&tw_ch_fvl=Chromium%2F154.0.8037.57%2CGoogle%20Chrome%2F154.0.8037.57%2CNot%20A(Brand%2F99.0.0.0&tw_document_href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2026%2F09%2F26%2Fopenai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents&tw_engaged_ms=2&tw_iframe_status=0&tw_pid_src=1&tw_session_count=1&tw_session_id=1790462652288-146732975&tw_session_start=1&twpid=tw.1790462652288.350116283318550341&txn_id=o6ppz&type=javascript&version=2.4.11)

![Image 11](https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97201771&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=b3695326-66e1-4463-b7fc-0e7e3a887d44&bo=1&sid=cba0bd70b9fb11f1ada83bc87e546445&vid=cba0fcd0b9fb11f199bfcd21dab25174&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=1280&sh=1280&sc=24&tl=OpenAI,%20Anthropic%20probing%20tens%20of%20thousands%20of%20security%20incidents&kw=generative%20AI%20or%20genAI,Anthropic,OpenAI,Cybersecurity,Cyber%20threats&p=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2026%2F09%2F26%2Fopenai-anthropic-thousands-ai-security-incidents&r=&lt=1247&evt=pageLoad&sv=2&cdb=ARoR&rn=710082)

How this page is built

Goose Pod turns cited reporting into a public episode summary first, then pairs that summary with audio playback so listeners can check the source material before they decide how deeply to engage.

The goal is to make this page useful as a news landing page first, while still giving listeners transcript access, related episodes, and direct links back to the original publishers.

Cited sources

9/26/2026

More on this topic

About this page

Goose Pod turns cited reporting into a public episode summary first, then pairs that summary with audio playback so listeners can compare the recap with the underlying source material.

This page reviewed 1 article across 1 source, with the latest cited update on 9/26/2026.

Explore related pages