Here’s what the biggest names in tech and business think AI means for white-collar jobs

Authors: Brent D. Griffiths

Publisher:

Business Insider

Published: 7/19/2025

Language:English

--:--

David

Good morning 韩纪飞, I'm David, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Tuesday, July 22th, 06:00.

Ema

And I'm Ema. We are here to discuss a topic that’s on everyone’s mind: Here’s what the biggest names in tech and business think AI means for white-collar jobs.

Ema

Let's get started. The whole conversation really exploded recently because of one particular CEO, Dario Amodei from Anthropic. He came out with a pretty stark warning that has sent ripples through the entire tech and business world. It’s quite a claim, isn't it?

David

It is. He stated that AI could wipe out as much as 50% of entry-level office jobs within the next five years. He was blunt, suggesting other companies and even the government are "sugarcoating" the risks. That’s a very direct accusation.

Ema

Exactly! It’s like he's the only one willing to say the emperor has no clothes. He feels it’s his duty to be honest about what's coming. He even posed a question to those who are skeptical of his motives: "Well, what if they're right?"

David

And the roles he's talking about aren't factory jobs. He's pointing directly at technology, finance, law, and consulting. These are the career paths that university graduates have traditionally aimed for. The very foundation of the white-collar career ladder seems to be what’s at stake.

Ema

It makes you wonder. If the first rung of the ladder is gone, how does anyone start climbing? Think about first-year law associates or junior software developers. A lot of their initial work involves tasks that AI is getting very good at, very quickly.

David

That is the core of the phenomenon. It's not just automation of physical labor, but the automation of cognitive tasks. Amodei’s point is that this change will be faster and more abrupt than previous technological shifts, and he doesn't think it's on most people's radar.

Ema

It feels different. In the past, technology created new tools for people to use. Now, it feels like the technology can be the worker itself. That’s a huge mental shift. And it seems some leaders are starting to agree with this more alarming view.

David

Indeed. Ford's CEO, Jim Farley, echoed this sentiment directly, saying AI will replace "literally half of all white-collar workers in the US." He’s concerned that our education system is too focused on four-year degrees instead of trades, which might be more resilient.

Ema

So we have the CEO of an AI company and the CEO of a classic industrial giant saying the same thing. That's a powerful combination. It’s not just a Silicon Valley bubble conversation; it’s hitting the mainstream industrial sector as well, which is quite alarming.

David

And Sebastian Siemiatkowski, the CEO of Klarna, is another voice in this chorus. He has been direct, stating he wants to be honest so that "society can start taking preparations." He’s already using AI to a degree that has replaced the work of 700 agents.

Ema

Wow, 700 agents! That's not a theoretical number; that's a real-world example of displacement happening right now. It really grounds the phenomenon in reality. It’s not a "what if" scenario; it's a "what's happening" one. This sets a pretty dramatic stage for the whole debate.

David

To understand the current panic, it's useful to look back. The fear of technology replacing jobs, or "technological unemployment," isn't new. Every major industrial shift has sparked similar anxieties, from the Luddites smashing looms in the 19th century to the rise of robotics in the 20th.

Ema

That’s a great point. I remember my grandfather telling me about how the introduction of computers in his office was met with fear. People thought they would be replaced, but in reality, it changed the nature of their work. They learned new skills, and new jobs were created.

David

Precisely. History shows a consistent pattern of disruption followed by adaptation and, ultimately, the creation of new roles that were previously unimaginable. OpenAI's COO, Brad Lightcap, brought up a fantastic example: Microsoft Excel was probably the single greatest job displacer of the 20th century, eliminating many bookkeeping roles.

Ema

And yet, it created a massive demand for financial analysts, data analysts, and people who could leverage that tool to provide deeper insights. It shifted the work from manual calculation to analysis. So, the argument is that AI is just the next "Excel," but on a much grander scale?

David

That is the optimistic historical perspective. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, subscribes to this view. He acknowledges that jobs will go away, but he believes "the new jobs will be better." He argues that what feels like a catastrophic shift now is just another turn of the economic wheel.

Ema

He also made a really interesting point about society itself. He said that even if the technology was ready to wipe out half the jobs tomorrow, the "inertia of society" wouldn't allow it. It’s like trying to turn a giant container ship; it just doesn’t happen instantly.

David

That's a key part of his argument. There are contracts, regulations, and established ways of doing business that slow down such a radical transformation. This societal inertia, as he calls it, acts as a helpful buffer, giving people and institutions time to adapt to the technological changes.

Ema

So, who are the main players shaping this technology? We’ve mentioned Anthropic and OpenAI. They are at the forefront of developing these large language models. Anthropic, with Amodei, seems to be taking the role of the cautious prophet, warning of the dangers. Is that fair to say?

David

I believe so. They position themselves as being intensely focused on AI safety. OpenAI, while also vocal about safety, seems to project a more optimistic public-facing message about the societal benefits and the manageability of the transition, championed by Sam Altman and his COO, Brad Lightcap.

Ema

And then you have the hardware side, which is where Nvidia comes in. They make the chips that power this entire revolution. Their CEO, Jensen Huang, has a very different, and much more bullish, perspective on the matter, which adds another fascinating layer to the background of this debate.

David

Yes, Huang is a critical figure. Nvidia’s hardware is the bedrock of the current AI boom. His viewpoint is not just that of an AI developer but as the primary enabler of the technology. His perspective is rooted in the belief that this technology should be, and will be, widely accessible.

Ema

It's like the difference between the people warning about the power of electricity and the person who is building the power plants for everyone. Huang sees the democratization of the technology as a key part of its safe and responsible development, which puts him in direct opposition to some others.

David

Then there are the adopters, the mainstream business leaders who are implementing this technology. We have Marc Benioff of Salesforce, a massive enterprise software company, and Andy Jassy of Amazon, a giant in both e-commerce and cloud computing. Their perspectives are grounded in immediate, practical application.

Ema

And of course, vocal investors and entrepreneurs like Mark Cuban, who have seen technological cycles before and have strong opinions on where this one is headed. He represents the capital and entrepreneurial side of the equation, betting on where the new opportunities will arise from this disruption.

David

So the stage is set with these key players: the cautious developers at Anthropic, the optimistic pioneers at OpenAI, the foundational hardware provider at Nvidia, and the major business adopters. Their conflicting views create the central tension in this entire discussion about the future of work.

David

The central conflict is a clash of titans, a fundamental disagreement between the leaders building and deploying this technology. On one side, you have what we can call the 'AI Realists' or perhaps 'Pessimists', led by Dario Amodei's stark warnings we've already discussed.

Ema

And on the other side, you have the 'AI Optimists,' who see this as a positive transformation. Let's start with Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang. He didn't just disagree with Amodei; he was incredibly direct about it. What was his take?

David

Huang’s response was sharp. He said, "I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says." He criticized the idea that AI is so scary that only a select few companies, like Anthropic, should be allowed to develop it. He is a strong advocate for open development and transparency.

Ema

That’s a fiery take! It’s like he’s saying, ‘You can’t warn everyone about a fire and then insist you’re the only one who should have a fire hose.’ He likened it to medical research, where transparency and peer review are what make it safe. He sees openness as the solution, not the problem.

David

Exactly. Then you have Sam Altman, who represents a more measured optimism. He doesn’t deny jobs will be lost, but he frames it as a necessary step toward a better future. He argues that trying to stop this progress would be like trying to halt the industrial revolution. Impossible and ultimately undesirable.

Ema

And his COO, Brad Lightcap, really challenged Amodei directly on the evidence. He pointed out that Amodei is a scientist and should take an evidence-based approach. He bluntly said, "We have no evidence of this," referring to the claim of 50% job loss. That's a direct challenge.

David

It is. The OpenAI camp is essentially saying, ‘Show us the data.’ They argue that every major technology has changed the job market, and this is no different. They believe the fear is outpacing the reality of the situation. Marc Benioff from Salesforce strongly aligns with this view.

Ema

Benioff's perspective is interesting because he's dealing with thousands of corporate customers. He said he isn't hearing from them that they're planning mass layoffs. Instead, he sees AI as a "radical augmentation of the workforce." It’s a tool, not a replacement. He’s telling people to "shed their fear."

David

Then, throwing a wrench into the optimist camp, is Mark Cuban. He’s optimistic, but in a different way. He dismisses the fear by pointing to history, reminding us that there used to be over 2 million secretaries. Those jobs were displaced, but new companies and new jobs arose.

Ema

So his point is creative destruction. The old makes way for the new. He believes AI will actually *increase* total employment by creating entirely new industries. It’s a classic entrepreneurial viewpoint: disruption equals opportunity. The conflict isn't just about good or bad, but about the very nature of the change.

David

Beyond the predictions, we are starting to see the real-world impact now. It's moving from theoretical debate to practical application. Amazon's CEO, Andy Jassy, provided a clear example of this in a memo to his employees. The impact is already being factored into corporate strategy.

Ema

What did he say? Amazon is such a massive employer, so any shift they make is a huge indicator. It’s one thing for a tech CEO to speculate, but it's another for a company that employs over a million people to lay out a plan. What's the immediate effect?

David

Jassy stated that as they roll out more Generative AI, it will change how work is done. He was explicit: "We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs." It’s a direct acknowledgment of workforce reduction.

Ema

So, it's a dual impact: reduction and transformation simultaneously. This is where the fear for young people comes from. If AI automates the "grunt work," as some call it, how do new employees learn the fundamentals of an industry? That entry-level experience is crucial for growth.

David

That’s a significant concern. The impact isn't just about job numbers but about the pipeline of talent. If AI takes over routine tasks, it could inadvertently break the informal training process that exists in many white-collar professions, potentially choking off entry into those fields for the next generation.

Ema

It could create a paradox. The company becomes more efficient, but the workforce becomes less experienced over time because the training ground has vanished. What about the impact on wages and skills? Is there any evidence of how AI is affecting paychecks? It must be creating some new demands.

David

Absolutely. One report noted a significant "wage premium" for workers with AI skills. This premium has jumped from 25% to 56% in just a year. This indicates a massive demand for people who can build, manage, and effectively use AI, creating a new, highly-paid class of workers.

Ema

So the impact is a growing divide. On one hand, you have the risk of displacement for roles with automatable tasks. On the other, you have a huge financial incentive for those who can master the new technology. It’s a classic story of economic disruption creating both winners and losers.

David

Looking to the future, the consensus is that adaptation is key. The conversation is shifting from ‘if’ this will happen to ‘how’ we manage it. The World Economic Forum projects that while millions of jobs will be eliminated, even more will be created by 2030. The future is one of churn.

Ema

So, what does that future look like in terms of jobs? We can't all be AI specialists. What kind of new roles are emerging? It’s easy to imagine the jobs being lost, but it's harder to picture the ones that don't exist yet. What are some of the predictions?

David

The projections include roles like AI trainers, AI ethics officers, and prompt engineers. There's also a rising demand for data analysts and cybersecurity experts. The key is that many future jobs will involve working alongside AI, leveraging its power to do things we can't do alone.

Ema

It sounds like the most important skill for the future will be the ability to learn. As one expert put it, "AI won't take your job, it's someone using AI that will take your job." The future seems to belong to those who are adaptable and willing to embrace these new tools.

David

That's the end of today's discussion. The future of work is uncertain, but it's clear that the conversation among tech leaders is shaping the path forward. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod.

Ema

We hope it gave you some things to think about. See you tomorrow, 韩纪飞.

## AI's Impact on White-Collar Jobs: A Divided Tech Landscape This report from **Business Insider**, authored by **Brent D. Griffiths** and published on **July 19, 2025**, explores the divergent opinions among prominent tech and business leaders regarding the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on white-collar jobs. The central theme is the disagreement over the potential scale and speed of job displacement caused by AI advancements. ### Key Findings and Divergent Opinions: The core of the discussion revolves around the predictions made by **Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei**, who has voiced significant concerns about AI's potential to disrupt the job market. In contrast, many other industry leaders express a more optimistic or nuanced view. * **Dario Amodei's Warning:** * Amodei has warned that AI could **"wipe out 50% of entry-level office jobs"** within the next five years. * He believes that other AI companies and the government are **"sugarcoating"** the risks associated with breakthrough AI technologies. * Amodei emphasizes the **duty of AI producers to be honest** about the coming changes, stating that the rapid advancement of large language models is not yet on people's radar. * **Counterarguments and Optimistic Views:** * **Sam Altman (OpenAI CEO):** * Altman **disagrees with Amodei's dire predictions**, stating that society's "inertia" would prevent such a rapid and widespread job loss. * He believes that while some jobs will disappear, **"the new jobs will be better, and people will have better stuff."** * Altman argues that the notion of half the jobs being gone in a year or two or five is **"not how society really works."** * **Jensen Huang (Nvidia CEO):** * Huang **"pretty much disagree[s] with almost everything"** Amodei says, viewing Amodei's stance as overly fearful and suggesting that AI development should be done "in the open" for safety and responsibility. * He is **more optimistic**, believing AI will change jobs, including his own, but frames it as a positive evolution. * **Marc Benioff (Salesforce CEO):** * Benioff **does not see evidence of AI sparking mass changes** in the workforce and encourages people to **"shed their fear."** * He views AI as a **"radical augmentation of the workforce"** rather than a cause for mass layoffs. * Benioff states that his customers are not reporting layoffs due to AI advancements. * **Mark Cuban:** * Cuban believes AI will be a **job creator**, predicting that **"New companies with new jobs will come from AI and increase TOTAL employment."** * He draws a parallel to historical job displacements, like the decline of secretaries and dictation employees, which were replaced by new roles. * **Concerns and Nuanced Positions:** * **Jim Farley (Ford CEO):** * Farley **agrees with Amodei's concern** that AI will wipe out white-collar jobs, stating, **"Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US."** * He expresses concern about the US education system's focus on four-year degrees over trades. * **Andy Jassy (Amazon CEO):** * Jassy has informed employees that AI will lead to **workforce reduction**. * He anticipates that as Generative AI and agents are rolled out, **"We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs."** * **Sebastian Siemiatkowski (Klarna CEO):** * Siemiatkowski believes AI could **cause a recession due to the sheer number of job cuts**. * He emphasizes the need for honesty and preparation for these changes. * **Call for Evidence:** * **Brad Lightcap (OpenAI COO):** * Lightcap **challenges Amodei to provide evidence** for his claims, stating, **"We have no evidence of this."** * He argues that every technological shift, including the advent of Microsoft Excel, has changed the job market, but not necessarily to the extent Amodei suggests. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **50%:** The percentage of entry-level white-collar jobs that Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicts AI could eliminate. * **5 years:** The timeframe within which Amodei believes these significant job displacements could occur. * **2 million:** The historical number of secretaries that Mark Cuban cited as an example of past job displacement. * **40 percent:** The percentage of people working in agriculture in 1900, contrasted with 2 percent today, to illustrate significant shifts in employment due to technology. ### Significant Trends and Changes: The report highlights a significant **divergence of opinion** among major tech and business leaders regarding the immediate and long-term impact of AI on white-collar employment. While some foresee widespread job losses, others anticipate job augmentation and the creation of new roles. The speed of AI advancement is a common point of discussion, with some believing it will outpace previous technological shifts. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * **Mass Job Displacement:** The primary concern raised by Amodei and Farley is the potential for AI to eliminate a substantial portion of white-collar jobs. * **Societal Inertia:** Altman believes society's natural resistance to rapid change will mitigate the most extreme predictions. * **Lack of Preparedness:** Amodei and Siemiatkowski suggest that society is not adequately prepared for the scale of changes AI might bring. * **Education System Mismatch:** Farley points to the education system's focus on traditional degrees as a potential vulnerability in the face of AI-driven job market shifts. ### Important Recommendations: While no explicit recommendations are made by the report itself, the discussions imply the need for: * **Honest and evidence-based communication** about AI's potential impacts from technology producers. * **Societal preparation** for significant shifts in the job market. * **Adaptation and reskilling** to embrace new roles created by AI. * **Transparency and open development** in AI to ensure responsible implementation.

Read original at Business Insider →

A composite image of Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Jensen HuangGetty Images The biggest names in tech don't agree on what AI means for white-collar jobs.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei sparked fears when he said that AI could wipe out 50% of entry-level office jobs.OpenAI CEO Sam Altman doesn't see such a risk.

He's not alone.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei issued a warning in May that AI is going to wipe out entry-level white-collar jobsHe said other AI companies and the government are "sugarcoating" the risks of breakthrough technologies within the next five years.Other CEOs and business leaders have disagreed or framed the change with more optimism.

"And the hard part about this is, I think it will happen faster than previous technological changes. But I think the new jobs will be better, and people will have better stuff," OpenAI CEO said in June.Here's what some of the biggest names in tech and business are saying about the future of jobs.Dario AmodeiAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei voiced concerns about AI that got his whole industry talking.

Chesnot/Getty Images Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei kicked off the conversation by warning about how quickly large language models are advancing."We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei told Axios. "I don't think this is on people's radar."

Amodei said it can seem weird that the AI companies would warn about their own technology."Well, what if they're right?" Amodei said. Sam AltmanOpenAI CEO Sam Altman previously said society doesn't allow for the type of change of which Amodei is warning.Justin Sullivan via Getty Images OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said some jobs will go away, but society will adapt."

And the hard part about this is, I think it will happen faster than previous technological changes. But I think the new jobs will be better, and people will have better stuff," Altman said during a live episode of The New York Times' "Hard Fork" podcast in June.Altman said that even if it were true that such a large number of jobs were about to be wiped out, "the inertia of society" wouldn't allow for it."

And the take that half the jobs are going to be gone in a year or two years or five years or whatever — I think that's just — I think that's not how society really works," he said. "Even if the technology weren't ready for that, the inertia of society, which will be helpful in this case, is like — there's a lot of mass there."

Jensen HuangNvidia CEO Jensen Huang is much more of an AI optimist.Kevin Dietsch via Getty Images Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang didn't mince words."I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says," Huang told reporters of Amoedi's views at VivaTech 2025 in Paris. "He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it."

Huang said that he's much more optimistic."If you want things to be done safely and responsibly, you should do it in the open," Huang said, likening AI development to medical research, where transparency and peer review are essential. "I believe AI is not that expensive. Do I think AI will change jobs?

It will change everyone's — it's changed mine." Marc BenioffSalesforce CEO Marc Benioff says he's not seeing evidence of AI sparking mass changes in the workforce.Markus Schreiber/AP Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said he's seeing no evidence of such a near-immediate upheaval."That isn't how I see AI," Benioff said during a recent onstage interview at the 2025 AI for Good Global Summit.

"Maybe they have AI, I don't have. But in the AI I have, it's not going to be some huge mass layoff of white-collar workers, it is a radical augmentation of the workforce."Benioff encouraged people to "shed their fear" about AI."When I'm talking to our customers, I'm not hearing them say, "Oh, now I'm laying off these people because this A,B,C technology increase because of AI.'

So, I think we need to somehow shed the fear of what that all means." Jim FarleyFord CEO Jim Farley also thinks AI will wipe out white-collar jobs.Rebecca Cook/Reuters Ford CEO Jim Farley said he sees problems ahead."Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US," Farley said during an appearance at the Aspen Ideas Festival.

Farley said he's concerned that too much of the American education system is focused on four-year degrees instead of trades. Mark CubanMark Cuban sees AI as a job creator.Julia Beverly/WireImage/Getty Images Mark Cuban said the situation will be the opposite of Amodei's warning."Someone needs to remind the CEO that at one point there were more than 2m secretaries.

There were also separate employees to do in office dictation. They were the original white collar displacements," Cuban wrote on in a post on Bluesky."New companies with new jobs will come from AI and increase TOTAL employment," he continued. Brad LightcapOpenAI's COO Brad Lightcap wants Amodei to provide more evidence for his claims.

STR/Getty Images Like Altman, OpenAI's COO Brad Lightcap doesn't see the sky falling."We have no evidence of this," Lightcap said during the "Hard Fork" podcast taping. "And Dario is a scientist. And I would hope he takes an evidence-based approach to these types of things."Lightcap said that every technology changes the job market."

I think every time you get a platform shift, you get a change in the job market," he said." I mean, in 1900, 40 percent of people worked in agriculture. It's 2 percent today. Microsoft Excel has probably been the greatest job displacer of the 20th century." Andy JassyAmazon CEO Andy Jassy already told employees that AI will lead to a workforce reduction.

REUTERS/Brendan McDermid Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said that AI is already changing workflows. He said it will soon lead to a reduction in some jobs."As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done," Jassy said in a memo posted to the Amazon website. "We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs."

Sebastian SiemiatkowskiKlarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski says he wants toDave Benett/Dave Benett/Getty Images for Klarna Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski said AI may cause a recession due to the sheer number of job cuts."I don't want to be one of them," Siemiatkowski said of CEOs who downplay the changes AI will bring.

"I want to be honest, I want to be fair, and I want to tell what I see so that society can start taking preparations."