‘Party of parents’: Trump touts government guidance to increase IVF access

‘Party of parents’: Trump touts government guidance to increase IVF access

2025-11-02Politics
--:--
--:--
Tom Bankswww
Good morning 跑了松鼠好嘛, I'm Tom Bankswww, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Sunday, November 02th, 22:04.
Mask
And I'm Mask, ready to dive into a topic that's sparking a lot of conversation: ‘Party of parents’: Trump touts government guidance to increase IVF access. It's a significant development, I think, for many families.
Tom Bankswww
Mask, the Trump administration is actively working to make in vitro fertilization, or IVF, more affordable. This is a significant push for many American families.
Mask
Indeed, Tom. EMD Serono, a major drugmaker, is substantially lowering the price of their fertility drug, GONAL-F. This discount could genuinely help.
Tom Bankswww
Excellent. GONAL-F, a vital IVF medication, will be more accessible via the new federal website, TrumpRx, launching 2026. A modern approach.
Mask
Absolutely. The administration also guides employers to provide their own fertility coverage. It's a multi-faceted strategy to reduce high costs.
Tom Bankswww
Employer flexibility is smart. This IVF affordability push gained traction after Roe v. Wade’s 2022 reversal. That surprisingly sparked IVF access concerns.
Mask
The legal landscape shifted. Experts believe lower drug prices will bring relief. Full IVF coverage is a "game changer," but drug cost help is "appreciated progress."
Tom Bankswww
"Game changer" is apt. The financial and emotional toll of fertility treatments is immense. Trump himself pledged IVF would be free or insurance-mandated.
Mask
His campaign promise, though not fully realized, highlighted the issue. The EMD Serono deal on TrumpRx is tangible. It shows leverage, given prior tariff threats.
Tom Bankswww
Yes, those tariff threats were effective. Trump's 100-percent tariff warning prompted major pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and EMD Serono to negotiate.
Mask
A very Mask tactic, using high-stakes pressure. He credited these threats with bringing manufacturing back. Disruptive, but effective in securing Gonal-F discounts.
Tom Bankswww
The Gonal-F discount is a win. Beyond medications, guidance for insurance companies to expand IVF coverage is vital. It allows for specialized supplemental plans.
Mask
This "unbundling" of fertility coverage is provocative. While questions about uninsured access remain, it creates a new pathway, breaking barriers.
Tom Bankswww
You're right, Mask. Even with gaps, a new path to parenthood is powerful. As the expert said, full coverage is ultimate, but drug cost progress is "much appreciated."
Mask
It's pragmatic. The Alabama Supreme Court decision put IVF in focus. Trump, initially unfamiliar, now embraces a "father of the effort" role, a notable shift.
Tom Bankswww
Mask, let's explore the history of IVF insurance coverage in the US. It's a complex, fragmented system, truly a "patchwork" rather than a unified approach.
Mask
You're absolutely right, Tom. There’s no universal mandate, so coverage depends entirely on state laws and employer benefits. It's a challenging maze for those seeking treatment.
Tom Bankswww
In the early days, pre-1980s, IVF was privately funded and incredibly costly. Then, from the late 80s into the 2000s, states like Arkansas, Massachusetts, and Hawaii began passing legislation for coverage.
Mask
Yes, Rhode Island, Illinois, Maryland, and New Jersey followed suit. These were significant bipartisan efforts, often framing IVF coverage as promoting family building, a positive step for many.
Tom Bankswww
It's interesting how different states led the way. However, the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, didn't universally mandate IVF coverage, which surprised many, including me.
Mask
Precisely. The ACA only requires IVF coverage in states where a mandate existed *before* 2012 and was part of the state's Essential Health Benefits. It's far from a blanket solution.
Tom Bankswww
So, essentially, only six states—Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island—see ACA-covered IVF. Everywhere else, it's a toss-up, depending on policy and employer?
Mask
Exactly. And even in those states, coverage isn't comprehensive. Small businesses, religious organizations, and the self-employed are often excluded. It truly highlights systemic issues in US healthcare.
Tom Bankswww
Many employers don't offer health insurance at all, let alone specialized fertility benefits. Plus, insurance typically covers IVF only with a couple's own gametes, often specifying heterosexual marriage and age limits for women.
Mask
It's incredibly restrictive. Given these limitations, it’s no wonder people historically found informal ways to afford treatment, like buying drugs in Mexico or Canada, or billing procedures under different codes.
Tom Bankswww
Desperate measures, indeed. The financial barrier is immense. A basic "fresh" IVF cycle costs $8,000 to $15,000, and that's *before* fertility drugs and monitoring. The total can climb astronomically.
Mask
Oh, it certainly does. Egg donation adds around $20,000, and surrogacy can easily exceed $100,000. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis adds another $4,000 to $7,500 per cycle. It's simply out of reach for many.
Tom Bankswww
Truly astronomical. And egg freezing is about $15,000 initially, plus annual storage fees. This financial reality means IVF access has always been stratified by socioeconomic status, making it a privilege.
Mask
"The insurance picture in the USA is a patchwork," as the article aptly states. Only 15 states have *some* fertility procedure coverage, with just 8 mandating IVF. So many are left without support.
Tom Bankswww
"In general, the more precarious your socioeconomic situation, the less likely you are to have insurance coverage for IVF." That's a profound and disheartening truth about our system, isn't it?
Mask
It is, Tom. Public funding is "meagre," and the absence of universal healthcare has cemented IVF as a fee-for-service sector. This market dynamic continues to create significant inequities.
Tom Bankswww
Mask, let's discuss the conflict around IVF. The Republican platform surprisingly supports IVF, yet opposes late-term abortion, a complex duality.
Mask
It truly is, Tom. Project 2025, a Republican blueprint, is packed with anti-abortion policies. IVF, involving embryo discarding, clashes with a strict "personhood" view.
Tom Bankswww
That's the tension. Project 2025 aims to protect the unborn, advocating to reverse FDA abortion drug approval and enforce the Comstock Act for a potential nationwide ban.
Mask
Absolutely. This ties to Alabama's ruling: embryos as children. That decision shocked many, halting IVF services and sparking fears about future access.
Tom Bankswww
The Alabama ruling made Trump more aware. He called it "bad," then pledged mandated insurance or federal IVF coverage. A clear political pivot.
Mask
A calculated pivot indeed. Trump seems to distance himself from Roe v. Wade's negative impact, which has hurt the GOP. He's trying to obscure positions.
Tom Bankswww
The political maneuvering is clear. Democrats, conversely, embrace abortion as healthcare and aim to "protect the right to access IVF." A stark contrast.
Mask
Couldn't be more different. The Biden-Harris administration already protects reproductive rights, enabling medication abortion access and defending FDA approval. They actively assist states.
Tom Bankswww
Medication abortion was 63% of all abortions in 2023. Project 2025's goal to reverse FDA approval for these drugs would have immense impact.
Mask
Enormous impact, Tom. Project 2025 states "abortion pills pose the single greatest threat to unborn children in a post-Roe world." A powerful, chilling claim.
Tom Bankswww
Senator Elizabeth Warren criticized Trump's plan as "insulting" and a "broken promise." He pledged free IVF, but guidance only encourages supplemental insurance.
Tom Bankswww
Mask, let's consider the impact of these policies, globally and on the US birthrate. The 2024 election's implications for reproductive health are huge, with Trump and Harris offering starkly different visions.
Mask
Absolutely, Tom. Trump's presidency reinstated the Mexico City Policy and expanded "Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance," restricting over $7.3 billion in US global health aid. That's a massive shift.
Tom Bankswww
A huge restriction, indeed. His administration also withdrew funding from the UN Population Fund, UNFPA, impacting roughly 8% of its budget, citing allegations of coercive practices which UNFPA denied.
Mask
These stoppages had profound consequences for global reproductive health, particularly in humanitarian settings. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris centers reproductive freedom, aiming to reverse Trump's policies and restore UNFPA funding.
Tom Bankswww
A complete reversal then. Beyond global policy, Trump also frames his new measures as progress for the US birthrate, a concern for many, including Elon Musk, who called it "the biggest danger civilization faces."
Mask
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. echoed this, calling the low birthrate "a national security threat." Mehmet Oz, however, spun the IVF guidance positively, quipping, "There are going to be a lot of Trump babies."
Tom Bankswww
An optimistic, perhaps provocative, view. But the declining US birthrate is real, dropping 3% in 2023, and 2% annually between 2014 and 2020. These numbers are stark.
Mask
The real test of impact, then, is whether insurance companies and employers truly follow through with Trump's guidance to offer supplemental fertility benefits. That's the key to widespread change.
Tom Bankswww
Indeed. The future of access and affordability rests on their decisions.
Tom Bankswww
Mask, what does the future hold for IVF access? The article highlights discounted medications via TrumpRx, once launched.
Mask
That's major, Tom. President Trump stated fertility drugs on TrumpRx.gov will be at "heavily reduced prices," dramatically cutting costs for consumers.
Tom Bankswww
Dramatically cut, with estimates suggesting IVF drug costs could fall by 73%. A massive reduction, making treatment far more accessible.
Mask
Absolutely. Beyond pricing, the administration expands insurance. Companies can legally offer supplemental fertility plans, a novel approach.
Tom Bankswww
A very novel, impactful approach. The aim is also to reduce IVF need through earlier identification and treatment.
Mask
Precisely. EMD Serono agreed to "most favored nations" pricing for future drugs, ensuring affordability. It’s framed as bringing "the miracle of life into more American homes."
Tom Bankswww
That's the end of today's discussion on IVF access and affordability. We've certainly covered a lot of ground, from historical context to future implications.
Mask
Indeed, Tom. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod, 跑了松鼠好嘛. We hope today's conversation provided valuable insights. See you next time!

The podcast discusses the Trump administration's efforts to increase IVF access by lowering fertility drug costs through the TrumpRx website and encouraging employers to offer fertility coverage. This initiative, spurred by concerns after Roe v. Wade's reversal and the Alabama Supreme Court ruling, aims to make IVF more affordable amidst a complex and fragmented insurance landscape.

‘Party of parents’: Trump touts government guidance to increase IVF access

Read original at Al Jazeera English

It was a major talking point in the final months of Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign: If re-elected, the Republican leader pledged to make in vitro fertilisation (IVF) free for those seeking to get pregnant.“Under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment,” Trump told NBC News last year.

“Or we’re going to be mandating that the insurance company pay.”Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Trump authorises CIA operations in Venezuela, says mulling land attacklist 2 of 3Trump threatens to ‘kill’ Hamas over Gaza gang clashes, says it must disarmlist 3 of 3Trump says he will meet Putin in Hungary after ‘productive’ phone callend of listWhile that campaign promise remains unrealised, the Trump administration took a step on Thursday to make the procedure more accessible.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump announced a collaboration with the company EMD Serono, a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical giant Merck, to offer lower-priced fertility drugs on his upcoming prescription marketplace, TrumpRx.“ EMD Serono, the largest fertility drug manufacturer in the world, has agreed to provide massive discounts to all fertility drugs they sell in the United States, including the most popular drug of all, the IVF drug Gonal-F,” Trump told reporters.

President Donald Trump announces a deal with EMD Serono in the Oval Office of the White House [Alex Brandon/AP Photo]Expanding TrumpRx projectThe announcement marks the third major pharmaceutical company to agree to provide discounted products on TrumpRx, a direct-to-consumer website slated to launch in 2026.

Trump had threatened drug companies in September with a 100-percent tariff on their products unless they started to build manufacturing facilities in the US.But that tariff was postponed after the pharmaceutical manufacturer Pfizer announced a deal with TrumpRx on September 30, a day before the tax hike was slated to hit.

AstraZeneca, another power player in the industry, followed suit last week.In Thursday’s news conference, Trump once again credited his tariff threats with bringing the companies to heel.“They’ll bring a significant portion of their drug manufacturing back to the United States,” Trump said of EMD Serono.

“That’s for a lot of reasons, but primarily because of the election result, November 5th, and maybe most importantly because of the tariffs.”In addition to the forthcoming discounts from EMD Serono, Trump indicated he would encourage insurance companies to expand coverage for IVF treatments.In the US, laws vary by state as to whether health insurance must cover fertility treatments like IVF.

Trump touted his government guidance as a breakthrough in making reproductive healthcare more accessible and affordable.“Effective immediately, for the first time ever, we will make it legal for companies to offer supplemental insurance plans specifically for fertility,” Trump said.“ Americans will be able to opt in, do specialised coverage, just as they get vision and dental insurance.

”Those plans typically come at an extra fee, on top of regular health insurance rates. That raises questions about how effective the new insurance guidance will be.More than 26 million Americans – roughly 8 percent of the population – are uninsured, according to US census data. Even more lack access to supplemental policies for dental and vision care.

The American Dental Association, an industry professional group, estimates more than 22 percent of US adults lacked dental insurance as of 2021.Trump seemed to acknowledge such coverage gaps during his remarks, but he maintained that the new government guidance would offer some adults a pathway to parenthood.

“They’re going to get fertility insurance for the first time,” he continued. “So I don’t know. I don’t know how well these things are covered.”From right, Senator Katie Britt, Mehmet Oz and Heidi Overton attend a White House news conference [Alex Brandon/AP Photo]A campaign-trail controversyThe Republican president also credited a 2024 court decision with propelling him to focus on IVF treatments.

IVF involves removing eggs from a patient’s ovaries and fertilising them in a laboratory environment. These eggs are then inserted into the patient’s uterus or frozen for future use.Such treatments are on the rise in the US: In 2023, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine found that 95,860 babies were born as the result of an IVF procedure.

But in February the following year, the Alabama Supreme Court prompted fears about whether IVF would remain widely available.In a novel decision, the court – located in a strongly conservative state – ruled that embryos created through IVF could be considered children under state law, thereby making the destruction of such embryos potentially a criminal act.

The decision sent shockwaves throughout the IVF industry, with clinics in Alabama temporarily suspending services. Discarding embryos is standard practice in IVF: Generally, more eggs are collected than will ultimately be used, and not all fertilised eggs will be suitable to start a pregnancy.Within weeks of the court’s decision, the Alabama state legislature stepped in to shield IVF providers from prosecution.

But the ruling created lingering concerns that IVF could be targeted by anti-abortion rights advocates.On Thursday, Trump revisited that controversy, which happened in the midst of his re-election bid. He called the court’s ruling a “bad decision” and credited it with helping to make him aware of IVF.

“I wasn’t that familiar with it,” Trump said. “Now I think I’ve sort of become the father.”Senator Katie Britt, who represents the state of Alabama, echoed that evaluation, praising Trump for taking steps to protect IVF.Thursday was not the first time Trump has gestured at lowering costs for the fertility procedure.

In February, he also issued a presidential order calling on his administration to start “protecting IVF access and aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs”.“ Mr President, this is the most pro-IVF thing that any president in the history of the United States of America has done,” Britt told Trump on Thursday.

“You are the reason why the Republican Party is now the party of parents.”President Donald Trump listens as Senator Katie Britt of Alabama speaks in the Oval Office [Alex Brandon/AP Photo]Addressing the US birthrateTrump, who previously called himself the “fertilisation president” during a Women’s History Month event, also framed the new measures as progress towards increasing the US birthrate.

In April, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that fertility remained at a historic low, rising slightly in 2024 to 1.6 births per woman.Those numbers have fuelled a push within the Republican Party to ignite a new baby boom, with right-wing figures like tech billionaire Elon Musk going so far as to call the low birthrate “the biggest danger civilization faces by far”.

At Thursday’s meeting, top figures in the Trump administration echoed those concerns, including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr.“We are below replacement right now,” he said, referencing the number of births needed to outpace deaths in the US. “That is a national security threat to our country.

”Mehmet Oz, who serves under Kennedy as the administrator for Medicaid services, took a more positive approach. He framed the new IVF guidance as a reversal of that downward birth trend.“There are going to be a lot of Trump babies,” Oz quipped. “I think that’s probably a good thing. But it turns out the fundamental creative force in society is about making babies.

”But it remains to be seen if insurance companies and employers will follow through with Trump’s guidance to offer supplemental fertility benefits for adults seeking to get pregnant.Most Americans receive health insurance as part of their workplace benefits. Senator Britt argued the guidelines would put employers “in the driver’s seat”, allowing them to shape the benefits they offer to their workers.

“Employers are going to be able to decide how to cover the root causes of infertility, things like obesity and metabolic health, and other things that are impacting infertility,” she said. “We want employers to be the ones that can make those decisions, not the government.”But for Democrats, the guidance fell far short of what Trump promised on the campaign trail.

“Donald Trump lied when he pledged to make IVF available to every family for FREE,” Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts posted afterwards on social media. “It’s insulting – a broken promise.”

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts