Her features are flawless. But this blonde, blue-eyed Vogue model isn’t real

Her features are flawless. But this blonde, blue-eyed Vogue model isn’t real

2025-07-30Technology
--:--
--:--
Aura Windfall
Good morning 跑了松鼠好嘛, I'm Aura Windfall, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Wednesday, July 30th. I'm here with Mask.
Mask
And today, we’re dissecting a beautiful lie: Her features are flawless. But this blonde, blue-eyed Vogue model isn’t real.
Aura Windfall
Let's get started. Imagine opening the pages of Vogue, the bible of fashion, and seeing a stunningly beautiful model. But then you find out she's not real. What does that do to our spirit, to our idea of truth in beauty? It's quite a moment to process.
Mask
It's a milestone, not a melodrama. For the first time, an AI-generated model is in a Guess ad, right inside Vogue. The agency behind it, Seraphinne Vallora, isn't just taking pictures; they're making history. They're disrupting the entire industry, and that's the real story here.
Aura Windfall
But what I know for sure is that we must question the nature of that 'history.' The agency itself admitted that when they feature more diverse models—different body types, different faces—their online engagement plummets by a staggering 90%. Is that a reflection of progress or a problem?
Mask
It's a reflection of market reality. A 90% drop is a catastrophic failure for any brand. They are a business, and the data is screaming at them. They are simply building a product that the market has overwhelmingly voted for with its attention and clicks. It's pragmatic.
Aura Windfall
To truly understand this, we have to see that this moment didn't just appear from nowhere. It's the crest of a huge technological wave. This AI model is built on years of development in artificial intelligence that's been quietly transforming the fashion world from the inside out.
Mask
Exactly. This is so much bigger than one AI model. The global AI in fashion market exploded by 40% in just one year. We're talking about AI creating new designs from scratch, virtual fitting rooms that reduce returns, and algorithms that predict trends before they even happen.
Aura Windfall
I hear the power in that, the efficiency. And tools like virtual try-ons can genuinely serve people. But I have to ask, what is the purpose of all this speed? When we chase efficiency so relentlessly, we risk losing the human touch, the artistry, and the soul that makes fashion compelling.
Mask
You call it soul, I call it inefficiency. Why rely on a designer's intuition when an AI can analyze a trillion data points to create something better? It reduces waste, optimizes production, and gives consumers what they want faster. That's not losing soul; it's building a smarter system.
Aura Windfall
A smarter system that may not be a wiser one. The system is learning, but what are we teaching it? That's the core of the issue. True wisdom in creation comes from a place of gratitude for human experience, not just data.
Aura Windfall
And that's where the real conflict ignites. Plus-size model Felicity Hayward called this move by Guess 'lazy and cheap.' Many critics argue this isn't true innovation; it's a cost-cutting tactic that devalues the work of human models, photographers, and stylists. It feels like a direct threat to their livelihood.
Mask
It's a threat to an outdated model, which is what disruption is all about. You can't stop progress. Some artists are even developing tools to 'poison' AI training data to protect their old methods. It’s like trying to fight a tidal wave with a bucket. It's completely futile.
Aura Windfall
But is it progress to reinforce a single, narrow beauty standard? The deep concern is that these AIs, trained on existing data, will just amplify our biases, promoting unrealistic and Eurocentric ideals. It feels like we are taking a giant leap backward, away from the hard-won progress in diversity.
Mask
It reflects the market; it doesn't create it. The data is clear on what generates engagement. It's a pragmatic business decision. To ignore that data and champion a message that loses 90% of your audience is not a viable strategy. Business is about winning, not just feeling good.
Aura Windfall
Let’s talk about the impact on people’s lives. A 2024 Dove report showed almost half of Australian women feel pressured to alter their appearance because of these fake or AI images. This isn't just a business decision; it has a real, measurable effect on human well-being and our collective spirit.
Mask
And the economic impact is adding up to $275 billion in value to the apparel and luxury sectors. That's real, too. That's massive productivity growth, new efficiencies, and innovation that pushes the entire industry forward. We can't ignore the sheer scale of the economic transformation here.
Aura Windfall
I worry we're trading something priceless for that profit. We're automating creativity and connection, which are fundamental to the human experience. What I know for sure is that a healthy society needs to value the well-being of its people as much as the health of its economy.
Aura Windfall
So, looking forward, how do we navigate this? There's already a push for regulation, like the Model Alliance Fashion Workers Act, to protect models' rights to their own digital 'twins.' There's a deep desire to ensure this technology serves us, as a tool, not a replacement.
Mask
The future is integration, not replacement. A digital twin is the peak of efficiency. It's faster, cheaper, and has a lower carbon footprint. Any regulation needs to be incredibly careful not to kill this innovation. You can't put the genie back in the bottle; you can only learn how to use its power.
Aura Windfall
That's the end of today's discussion. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod. See you tomorrow.

## Vogue Features AI Model, Sparking Controversy and Debate on Fashion's Future **News Title:** Her features are flawless. But this blonde, blue-eyed Vogue model isn’t real **Report Provider:** ABC **Author:** Charmayne Allison **Publication Date:** July 29, 2025 ### Key Findings and Conclusions: For the first time in history, *Vogue* magazine has featured an AI-generated model in its August print edition. The two-page spread, an advertisement for Guess's summer collection, has ignited significant online controversy. Critics argue that the use of AI models threatens diversity in fashion, reinforces unattainable beauty standards, and raises questions about the future of real models. ### Critical Information: * **The AI Model:** The AI model featured in *Vogue* has "sleek blonde hair, a delicate nose and flawless features." * **Creators:** The images were created by London-based AI marketing agency **Seraphinne Vallora**, co-founded by former architects Valentina Gonzalez and Andreea Petrescu. * **Campaign Acquisition:** Seraphinne Vallora secured the Guess campaign after Guess co-founder Paul Marciano contacted them via Instagram. * **Creation Process:** Generating the AI imagery involves a process that can take "several weeks and hundreds of iterations" to perfect details like texture and movement. * **Vogue's Disclaimer:** A "subtle disclaimer" stating the images are AI-generated was printed in the top-left corner of the right page of the spread. * **Industry Response:** * **Online Backlash:** Readers have expressed criticism, with one stating *Vogue* had "lost credibility." * **Concerns for Real Models:** Some believe AI models will make it impossible for real models to compete with unrealistic beauty standards. * **Guess's Silence:** *Vogue* directed inquiries to Guess, which did not respond by the deadline. * **Potential Motivations for Using AI Models:** * **Cost Reduction:** RMIT fashion lecturer Rashmita Bardalai suggests Guess may be using AI models to cut the logistical and financial costs of traditional fashion shoots. * **Creative Control:** AI offers brands control over styling environments, allowing models to be placed in any digital world. * **Impact on Beauty Standards:** * **Audience Engagement:** Seraphinne Vallora stated that their online engagement "plummets" when they experiment with "more diversity" in AI models (different body types and facial features), noting a **90% decrease** in views (from 10 million to 1 million per month) in such instances. They claim they are "simply reflecting what has been established culturally and what audiences still respond to today." * **Reinforcing Unrealistic Ideals:** Melissa Wilton of The Butterfly Foundation warned that AI models could lead to a surge in disordered eating due to increasingly "unrealistic and unattainable" beauty ideals. * **Dove Report Data:** A 2024 Dove report indicated that almost **50% of Australian women** felt pressured to alter their appearance due to online content, even when aware the images were fake or AI-generated. * **Eurocentric Bias:** AI models may reinforce Eurocentric beauty ideals (light skin, straight hair, thinness) and exclude racial minorities. * **Future of Fashion:** * **Expected Demand:** Seraphinne Vallora anticipates a significant increase in demand for their AI-generated models. * **AI as an Alternative:** They position their services as a "faster, lower-cost 'creative alternative'" rather than a replacement for traditional methods. * **Potential Benefits:** Dr. Bardalai highlighted AI's potential in fashion for sustainable design and reducing purchase returns. * **Regulation and Labeling:** Dr. Bardalai emphasized the need for AI to be properly regulated and for AI images to be clearly labeled, noting this is not currently a legal obligation in Australia. * **AI as a Tool, Not a Substitute:** While AI can "disrupt workflows" for tasks like pre-launch teasers and lookbooks, Dr. Bardalai believes there's "little risk they'll replace real-life models entirely," stressing the irreplaceable value of the "human touch" and "emotional intelligence." ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * Threat to diversity in fashion. * Reinforcement of unattainable beauty standards. * Potential negative impact on real models' careers. * Risk of increased disordered eating due to unrealistic beauty ideals. * Reinforcement of Eurocentric beauty biases. * Lack of clear regulation and mandatory labeling for AI-generated content in Australia. ### Significant Trends or Changes: * The increasing integration of AI in the fashion industry, exemplified by *Vogue*'s first AI model feature. * A growing debate about the ethical implications of AI in media and advertising. * The potential for AI to alter cost structures and creative processes in fashion campaigns. * The tension between audience preferences for conventional beauty standards and the industry's stated progress towards diversity.

Her features are flawless. But this blonde, blue-eyed Vogue model isn’t real

Read original at ABC

She has sleek blonde hair, a delicate nose and flawless features.But she is not real.For the first time in history, Vogue has featured an AI model in its pages.The two-page spread, an ad for Guess's summer collection, is in the fashion bible's August print edition.But it has sparked significant online controversy, with some claiming it threatens diversity in fashion and reinforces already unattainable beauty standards.

Others say it calls into question the future of real models.Here's what we know.It's the first time Vogue has featured an AI model in its pages. (Supplied: Seraphinne Vallora)Who created the images?The images were created by London-based AI marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora.Co-founded by former architects Valentina Gonzalez and Andreea Petrescu, the company builds fashion campaigns for major brands using artificial intelligence."

When we started, no one was doing this," the co-founders told the ABC in a statement."But with the global attention we've received and the results we've shown, we're seeing a massive shift in awareness."Valentina Gonzalez and Andreea Petrescu are the co-founders of Seraphinne Vallora. (Supplied: Seraphinne Vallora)They scored the Guess campaign after co-founder Paul Marciano "slid into their DMs" on Instagram.

Once they'd worked with the brand to learn their creative vision, Seraphinne Vallora generated the imagery.It's a process they say can take several weeks and hundreds of iterations, as they work to perfect the texture, movement and details of the advertised product.The resulting Vogue spread featured summery images of a blonde model wearing a floral mini dress and a striped maxi dress.

In one corner, there's a subtle disclaimer that the images are AI-generated.Vogue printed a tiny disclaimer in the top-left corner of the right page (circled in red). (Supplied: Seraphinne Vallora)What has been the response?Vogue has faced online backlash for including the ad in its latest print edition.

One reader says the magazine had "lost credibility".Others pointed out that with the rise of AI, even models would not be able to compete with unrealistic beauty standards.Vogue directed the ABC's inquiries to Guess, which did not respond by the deadline.Seraphinne Vallora created several AI-generated images for Guess.

(Supplied: Seraphinne Vallora)RMIT fashion lecturer Rashmita Bardalai says Guess may have opted for an AI-generated model to cut the costs of traditional fashion shoots — both logistical and financial."It also gives them control over styling environments, so they can place models in any type of digital world," she said.

How could this impact beauty standards?Seraphinne Vallora says while they can create any kind of model, they've noticed online engagement plummets as soon as they experiment with "more diversity".This includes different body types and facial features."Our reach would drop from 10 million views per month to just 1 million.

That's a 90 per cent decrease," they said in a statement."We're simply reflecting what has been established culturally and what audiences still respond to today."Seraphinne Vallora says the AI-generated images on their Instagram page are a response to audience behaviour. (Supplied: Instagram/@seraphinnevallora)Dr Bardalai says fashion has made "real progress" in diversity in recent years, platforming models with different body types, ages, ethnicities and abilities, as well as trans models.

She says it's crucial AI is trained with unbiased datasets, to ensure it doesn't promote "outdated beauty norms".Seraphinne Vallora designed a brunette AI model for Guess as well. (Supplied: Seraphinne Vallora)The Butterfly Foundation's Melissa Wilton says AI models may spark a surge in disordered eating, as people pursue increasingly "unrealistic and unattainable" beauty ideals.

She said a 2024 Dove report showed almost 50 per cent of Australian women felt pressured to alter their appearance because of online content, even when they knew images were fake or AI-generated."AI may also reinforce Eurocentric beauty ideals, such as light skin, straight hair and thinness, while also excluding racial minorities," she said.

Guess has used AI-generated images in its summer campaign. (Supplied: Seraphinne Vallora)What is the future of fashion?Seraphinne Vallora say they expect demand for their AI-generated models will explode in the coming years.However, they say they don't want to replace traditional methods, but offer a faster, lower-cost "creative alternative".

Meanwhile, Dr Bardalai says while AI offers "really exciting potentials" in the fashion space — including supporting sustainable design and reducing purchase returns — it's crucial it's properly regulated.Seraphinne Vallora says it can take weeks to create an AI-generated model for luxury brands.She says AI images must also be clearly labelled — currently not a legal obligation in Australia.

But while AI models could "disrupt workflows" in certain fashion productions such as pre-launch teasers and lookbooks, Dr Bardalai says there's little risk they'll replace real-life models entirely."How do we use this as a tool and not as a substitute?" she says."But the human touch, the emotional intelligence — of course, that remains irreplaceable."

Analysis

Phenomenon+
Conflict+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts