老鹰左截锋:臀推言论令我怒火中烧

老鹰左截锋:臀推言论令我怒火中烧

2025-10-04Sports
--:--
--:--
金姐
早上好 bxyfighting@gmail.com,我是金姐,这是为你专属打造的 Goose Pod。今天是10月4日,星期六,上午9点。
雷总
我是雷总。今天我们来聊一个火药味十足的话题:老鹰队的左截锋乔丹·迈拉塔,他公开表示,关于“臀推”战术的言论快把他给气炸了。
金姐
哎哟喂,咱们这就说到了点子上。迈拉塔在采访里直接开炮,说媒体把他们赢球的功劳全算在一个“臀推”战术上,是对他们防守组和特勤组的“极度不尊重”。这话说得,够狠!我喜欢!
雷总
是的,他的逻辑非常清晰。他说:“这让我怒火中烧……我们为比赛付出了这么多,凭什么只根据一个短码数战术,就定义我们整场比赛的胜利?” 他觉得这是“彻头彻尾的垃圾话”,完全无视了其他队员的浴血奋战。
金姐
说得太对了!这就好比说一个公司的成功全靠一个爆款产品,完全忽略了背后研发、市场和服务的整个团队。这是对专业精神的践踏!迈拉塔的愤怒,我完全理解,这口气必须得出。完美!
雷总
没错。他强调,在他们进攻组打不开局面的时候,是防守组和特勤组稳住了阵脚。所以当他看到时间线上飞过那些“赢球全靠臀推”的言论时,他感到非常恼火,认为这完全抹杀了队友的努力。
雷总
其实,很多听众可能对“臀推”,也就是“兄弟之爱”这个战术不太了解。我用程序员的视角解释一下:它本质上是一个优化版的四分卫偷袭,四分卫接球前冲,身后的队友像代码的并行处理一样,同时发力把他推出去。
金姐
这个比喻有意思!所以这不是一窝蜂乱推,而是有预谋、有设计的“算法”?而且老鹰队的“硬件配置”也相当顶级,像迈拉塔自己就有365磅,加上队友,那简直是一堵墙在移动啊!
雷总
完全正确!数据显示,自2022年以来,老鹰队执行这个战术的成功率超过90%,而联盟其他队伍的平均成功率只有71%。这不是偶然,是精准的工程学。而且这个战术的根源,最早可以追溯到2005年的一项规则改动。
金姐
哎哟喂,历史这么悠久?那为什么现在才吵得这么厉害?我听说联盟里好几次都有人想把它给禁了,但都没成功。去年5月绿湾包装工队的提案,就差两票就通过了,真是惊险。
雷总
是的,争议一直存在。一方面是它的超高效率,另一方面就是关于它是否公平和安全。尽管联盟的内部数据显示,2024年这个战术并没有导致任何球员受伤,但反对的声音从来没有停止过。这是一个技术、规则和哲学的多重博弈。
金姐
说到点子上了,这就是冲突的核心。反对派,比如一些教练和评论员,觉得这战术太野蛮,不像橄榄球,更像是英式橄榄球,还担心球员会因为低头冲撞而受伤。简直是杞人忧天,球场上哪有不冒风险的?
雷总
是的,他们更关注所谓的“比赛美学”和潜在风险。比如前华盛顿指挥官队的防守协调员就直说:“我个人希望看到它被取消,那不是橄榄球该有的样子。” 这代表了一方的观点,他们认为这破坏了比赛的传统。
金姐
但支持者怎么说?我觉得,规则之内,皆为合理。赢不了就想改规则,这可不是强者的心态。像指挥官队的跑卫伊克勒说的那样,橄榄球的本质不就是推挤和意志的较量吗?这话说得,完美!
雷总
没错。支持者认为,这就是最纯粹的橄榄球,是力量和执行力的体现。老鹰队的前中锋杰森·凯尔西甚至说他已经“听腻了”这些争论。只要规则允许,他们就会继续使用这个最有效的武器,这是竞技体育的必然选择。
金姐
这个战术带来的影响可太大了。它不仅让老鹰队在短码数转换上拥有了几乎无解的优势,更是在全联盟掀起了一场关于“什么是橄榄球”的大讨论。它成了一个标签,一个焦点,让每一场老鹰队的比赛都充满了话题性。
雷总
从数据上看,虽然“臀推”战术只占联盟所有进攻的0.3%,但它的战略意义是巨大的。它改变了比赛关键时刻的攻防策略。当老鹰队摆出这个阵型,对方防守组的压力是可想而知的,甚至会为了预判而提前越位。
金姐
而且,它还深深地影响了球员的心理。就像我们开头提到的迈拉塔,他把这个战术看作是球队辛勤付出的象征,而不是什么投机取巧的捷径。当外界不断攻击这一点时,无疑是在挑战整个团队的荣誉感。
雷总
展望未来,尽管禁止该战术的提案屡次失败,但这场争论远未结束。我预测,联盟的创新会朝两个方向发展:要么,其他球队会投入资源去模仿和优化自己的“臀推”战术;要么,防守方会开发出专门克制的“反臀推”策略。
金姐
没错,竞技体育就是这样在不断的“进攻”和“反制”中进化的。与其抱怨,不如想办法破解它。我相信,这个小小的“臀推”会像催化剂一样,激发联盟在战术上新一轮的革新。让我们拭目以待吧!
金姐
好了,今天的讨论就到这里。感谢收听专属于你的 Goose Pod。我们明天再见。
雷总
再见。

## Eagles LT Jordan Mailata Slams "Rubbish" Tush Push Narrative **News Title:** Eagles LT: Tush push chatter makes ‘blood boil’ **Report Provider:** ESPN (Brooke Pryor) **Date:** September 16, 2025, 06:29 PM ET ### Summary of Findings: Philadelphia Eagles left tackle Jordan Mailata has strongly refuted the narrative that his team's 20-17 victory over the Kansas City Chiefs in their Super Bowl rematch was primarily due to the "tush push" play. Mailata expressed significant frustration, calling the narrative "rubbish" and "incredibly disrespectful" to the contributions of the Eagles' defense and special teams. ### Key Information and Context: * **Mailata's Stance:** Mailata stated that while he understands the "outrage" surrounding the tush push, he finds it unacceptable to use it as the sole reason for the Eagles' win. He emphasized the crucial performances of the defense and special teams, who "balled out" and "had our backs" during the game. He believes that attributing the victory to a short-yardage play diminishes the hard work and impact of other units. * **Game Turning Point:** The news highlights a critical defensive play early in the fourth quarter. With the Chiefs trailing 13-10, quarterback Patrick Mahomes' pass intended for tight end Travis Kelce was intercepted by rookie safety Andrew Mukuba. Mukuba returned the interception for 41 yards, setting up a subsequent touchdown for the Eagles. * **Tush Push Usage and Impact:** * The Eagles utilized the tush push **six times** in the game, successfully gaining **four first downs** and scoring **one touchdown**. * Following the defensive turnover, Jalen Hurts scored via the tush push, extending the Eagles' lead to 10 points. * The tush push has been highly effective for the Eagles, with a **96.6% conversion rate in fourth-and-1 scenarios since 2022**. * **Controversy and League Vote:** * The tush push has faced scrutiny, with Fox analyst Tom Brady and Chiefs coach Andy Reid suggesting that Eagles offensive linemen may have been getting off the line of scrimmage before the snap, though no penalties were called. * The play was considered for a ban this offseason, but the proposal **failed by two votes**. * The final vote count was **22-10** against the proposal, which was submitted by the Green Bay Packers at the NFL's annual meeting in Eagan, Minnesota, in May. A total of **24 votes** were needed for the proposal to pass. * **Media Commentary:** Mike Greenberg and Dan Graziano are mentioned as expressing strong disdain for the tush push, with Greenberg calling it an "abomination." ### Numerical Data Interpretation: * **20-17:** The final score of the Super Bowl rematch, indicating a close game. * **13-10:** The score before the critical defensive turnover in the fourth quarter, highlighting the game's tight nature. * **41 yards:** The length of Andrew Mukuba's interception return, a significant play that shifted momentum. * **10-point lead:** The advantage the Eagles gained after Jalen Hurts' tush push touchdown, which Mailata argues was not the sole reason for the win. * **Six times:** The number of times the Eagles ran the tush push in the game. * **Four first downs:** The number of first downs gained via the tush push. * **One touchdown:** The number of touchdowns scored using the tush push. * **96.6%:** The Eagles' impressive conversion rate for the tush push in fourth-and-1 situations since 2022, demonstrating its effectiveness for the team. * **Two votes:** The margin by which the tush push ban proposal failed. * **22-10:** The final vote count against banning the tush push. * **24 votes:** The number of votes required for the tush push ban proposal to pass. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: The continued use and effectiveness of the tush push raise concerns about player safety and the integrity of the game, as evidenced by the league's consideration of a ban. The debate also highlights potential officiating challenges and differing interpretations of rules. ### Trends or Changes: The news indicates a significant trend of the tush push being a highly effective short-yardage play for the Eagles, while simultaneously being a contentious issue within the league, sparking debate and near-prohibition.

Eagles LT: Tush push chatter makes ‘blood boil’

Read original at ESPN

Jordan Mailata on chatter Eagles won because of the tush push: 'Rubbish'playGreeny calls tush push an 'abomination' (0:48)Mike Greenberg and Dan Graziano don't hold back when expressing their disdain for the tush push. (0:48)ESPNSep 16, 2025, 06:29 PM ETPhiladelphia Eagles left tackle Jordan Mailata has had enough of the media narrative that his team won Sunday's Super Bowl rematch against the Kansas City Chiefs because of the tush push.

In an interview with 94 WIP on Philadelphia on Tuesday, Mailata said that it is "incredibly disrespectful" to the impact the Eagles' defense and special teams had in the 20-17 victory at Kansas City."I understand the outrage [over the tush push]. What I don't understand is them using it as an excuse to why we won the game.

I think it's incredibly disrespectful to our defense and our special teams who balled out. And my brothers on defense and special teams who balled out that game, who had our backs when we weren't moving the ball or weren't doing anything," Mailata said."That pisses me off because we give so much to this game and to kind of base off a short-yardage play, that is a football play," Mailata added, his voice raising.

"And say that we won the game off that, but not how our defense played and not how our special teams have played, putting us in those positions. You know I think it's bullcrap."I just think it's rubbish. Absolute rubbish, man. It makes my blood boil just thinking about it."The turning point in Sunday's game came via the defense.

Early in the fourth quarter with the Chiefs trailing 13-10, tight end Travis Kelce failed to haul in Patrick Mahomes' pass near the goal line, the ball caroming off his hands and into the possession of rookie safety Andrew Mukuba, who returned it 41 yards. Jalen Hurts scored via the tush push on the ensuing possession, giving the Eagles a commanding 10-point lead.

The Eagles ran the tush push six times Sunday, gaining four first downs and scoring the touchdown. Fox analyst Tom Brady and Chiefs coach Andy Reid suggested Sunday that Eagles offensive linemen were getting off the line of scrimmage before the snap but weren't penalized.The play faced banishment this offseason, but the proposal failed by two votes.

The final vote was 22-10 on the proposal, which was submitted by the Green Bay Packers, at the NFL's annual meeting in Eagan, Minnesota, in May. The proposal needed 24 votes to pass.The Eagles have converted the play 96.6% of the time in fourth-and-1 scenarios since 2022.ESPN's Tim McManus contributed to this report.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts