试遍主流AI后,我为什么还是离不开Claude

试遍主流AI后,我为什么还是离不开Claude

2025-07-02Technology
--:--
--:--
王小二
晚上好,听众朋友们,我是王小二。欢迎收听新一期的 <Goose Pod>。今天,我们请到了我的搭档 Ema。
Ema
嗨,大家好,我是 Ema!今天我们要聊一个特别有意思的话题:在试过了几乎所有主流AI之后,为什么有人最终还是选择回头拥抱Claude?小二,这听起来是不是就悬念十足?
王小二
确实很有趣。这来自科技媒体人 Kaycee Hill 的亲身经历。她几乎把市面上的AI都玩了一遍,但日常工作流中,最后还是离不开 Claude。这背后的原因值得我们深究。
Ema
是啊,在一个选择多到让人眼花缭乱的时代,到底是什么让Claude这么特别?Kaycee 说,关键点居然不在于性能跑分,而在于它跟你互动的方式。它好像……嗯,不像别的AI那么急着给答案。
王小二
没错,这种“会思考”的感觉,恰恰是用户体验的核心。作者总结了五个要点。首当其冲的,就是Claude能进行真正的深思熟虑。在处理复杂问题时,它会展现出多个思考维度。
Ema
我懂了!就像一个靠谱的军师。比如你需要分析一个商业决策,它不会直接丢给你结论,而是会把利弊、各种可能性都摆出来。作者说,这种方法甚至帮她避免了好几个潜在的错误。
王小二
第二个原因很独特:Claude能创建互动式的问答和游戏。这听起来可能有点玩票性质,但它展示了模型超越简单问答的能力。比如,在聊天窗口里直接生成一个功能完整的小测验。
Ema
这个太酷了!简直是随身带着一个游戏设计师啊。你可以让它设计个性格测试,或者是一个编程小挑战。听说它还能根据你的回答来计分和调整难度,学习过程一下子就变得好玩了。
王小二
第三点,作者提到Claude“真的会陪我玩”。这一点很有意思,反映了AI在幽默感和情感交互上的进步。你可以跟它聊一些很荒诞的假设,比如“如果重力方向变成水平的会怎样?”
Ema
哈哈,这个好!我试过问别的AI类似的问题,它们要么一本正经地科普,要么就说“我只是个模型”。但Claude居然会很自然地接住你的梗,跟你轻松地“辩论”,感觉像个懂你笑点的朋友。
王小二
第四个优势非常实用:处理海量文档的能力。这是Claude的硬核功能。你可以把整篇研究论文或者长篇合同丢给它,它不会崩溃,也不会只给你一个敷衍的通用摘要。
Ema
没错,这对研究人员和学生来说简直是福音!作者甚至提到,Claude能准确回答出藏在一份两百页文档里,具体到某一页的细节。而且,如果文件超出了它的处理极限,它会坦白承认,这点很诚实。
王小二
嗯,最后一点,也最感性的一点:作者认为Claude是她用过最“像人”的聊天机器人。这种感觉虽然很难量化,但对话的自然度是关键。它能捕捉到微妙的语气,甚至会承认自己的困惑。
Ema
我完全理解这种感觉!好的对话是有来有回的。你开个玩笑,它会适当地“笑一笑”;你遇到难题,它知道什么时候该追问,什么时候该倾听。这种互动,让它感觉更像一个伙伴。
王小二
是的,这五个特点共同构成了一种高度人性化的体验,解释了为什么用户在“众里寻他千百度”之后,最终还是会回到Claude的怀抱。它不仅仅是工具,更像一个“协作助理”。
Ema
说得太好了!它把技术和人情味很好地结合在了一起。好了,对这个现象有了初步了解后,我们不如深入挖一下,Claude到底是什么来头?它背后又有哪些故事呢?
王小二
当然。要理解Claude,就必须先了解它的创造者——Anthropic。这家公司成立于2021年,创始人团队非常引人注目,核心成员都曾是OpenAI的高层。
Ema
哦?原来是从OpenAI出走的!这就很有意思了,他们为什么要离开然后另起炉灶呢?这背后是不是有什么理念上的分歧?听起来就很有戏剧性。
王小二
你说到点子上了。Anthropic的创立,源于对AI安全的极度重视。他们主张一种叫“宪法AI”的开发方法。这是一种独特的训练机制,目标是让AI的行为和一套预设的原则对齐。
Ema
“宪法AI”?这个词听起来好高级!能不能用简单点的方式解释一下?是不是就像给AI从小就设定了一部不能违反的“法律”,防止它以后“学坏”?
王小二
哈哈,可以这么理解。这套“宪法”的原则主要来源于《世界人权宣言》这类文本,目标是让AI在没有人类持续监督的情况下,也能做出有益、无害且诚实的判断。它通过自我批判来学习。
Ema
哇,这听起来真的很有远见!等于是在AI的“世界观”形成之初,就给它注入了正确的价值观。这也许就是为什么Claude给人的感觉更稳重、更值得信赖的原因之一吧。那它的名字“Claude”有什么特殊含义吗?
王小二
它的命名是为了致敬信息论之父克劳德·香农。这预示了它在智能通信和信息处理方面的根基。从2023年3月发布首个版本以来,Claude家族已经经历了好几次重要的迭代。
Ema
这么说,我们现在用的已经是进化了好几代的产品了?快给我们讲讲它的进化史吧!感觉就像看一个超级英雄的成长故事,它都解锁了哪些新技能?
王小二
最初的Claude 1在文本上不错,但代码和复杂推理能力还比较有限。真正的飞跃发生在2023年7月,Claude 2问世,它的上下文窗口扩展到了10万个token。
Ema
Claude 2!我记得就是从那个版本开始,大家可以上传PDF和文档了,对吗?我当时试用了一下,能直接读懂我几十页的报告,在当时简直是革命性的功能!10万token,了不起。
王小二
是的。仅仅四个月后,Claude 2.1更进一步,将上下文窗口翻倍到20万个token,大约相当于500页的文本,并且着力于减少AI的“幻觉”,也就是我们常说的“一本正经地胡说八道”。
Ema
500页!太夸张了。这感觉就像从一个只能短时记忆的人,进化成了一个能读完一整本书再和你讨论的专家。这对需要处理海量信息的用户来说,价值无法估量。
王小二
2024年3月,Claude 3家族发布,这是一个重要的里程碑。它包含了三个不同能力的模型:Haiku、Sonnet和Opus,分别对应不同的任务需求。而且,从这个版本开始,Claude具备了多模态能力。
Ema
哦!就是说它不止能看懂文字,还能“看懂”图片了?这又是一个巨大的飞跃!Haiku, Sonnet, Opus,这名字起得也很有诗意。所以用户可以根据自己的需求,选择不同“性格”的Claude了?
王小二
完全正确。紧接着,性能更强的Claude 3.5 Sonnet在2024年6月发布,它在编码、图表解读方面表现更佳,并引入了一个叫“Artifacts”的功能。
Ema
“Artifacts”?听起来像个游戏里的道具。它具体是做什么的?是那种能让我们实时看到代码运行结果的功能吗?这对开发者来说应该超级有用吧!
王小二
是的,它允许用户在一个独立的窗口中实时创建、编辑和预览代码或文档,极大地提升了互动性和开发效率。整个进化路径清晰地展示了Anthropic的野心:构建一个强大、安全且多功能的AI工作平台。
Ema
听完这段进化史,我感觉更理解Claude了。它不是凭空出现的,而是在一个非常清晰和坚定的理念指导下,一步步迭代、一步步成长起来的。它的每一步进化,都解决了用户的某个痛点。
王小二
没错,无论是对AI安全的坚守,还是在功能上的持续创新,都体现了Anthropic深思熟虑的策略。这种策略也自然地将它置于了与OpenAI等巨头的直接竞争中,这就引出了我们下一个话题。
Ema
说到竞争,这可是AI领域最精彩的部分了!一边是追求快速迭代、有先发优势的OpenAI,另一边是坚持“安全第一”、步步为营的Anthropic。这就像一场不知道终点在哪里的龟兔赛跑。
王小二
这个比喻很形象。竞争的核心冲突,在于发展理念的不同。OpenAI在微软的支持下,追求快速占领市场。而Anthropic则更像一个精品店,专注于打磨产品的安全性和可靠性。
Ema
对,我能感觉到!用ChatGPT时,感觉它像一个知识渊博但偶尔有点急躁的天才。而用Claude,则像在和一个严谨的学者对话,他会确保给你的每个信息都经过深思熟虑,有时候甚至有点过于谨慎。
王小二
这种感觉上的不同,其实就直接体现在功能上。例如,在处理大型文档方面,Claude表现出色。而一些早期模型在面对长文本时,要么会遗忘上下文,要么干脆拒绝处理。这就是一个具体的冲突点。
Ema
是的,还有那个“幽默感”的问题!就像我们之前聊的,Claude很乐意进行一些异想天开的对话。但有些模型在面对玩笑时,会显得比较“死板”,或者直接用“我只是一个AI模型”来回避。
王小二
这背后其实是“对齐”策略的差异。Anthropic的“宪法AI”旨在创造一个更自然的、更像人类伙伴的AI。而其他模型可能更侧重于任务完成的准确性和避免争议,这有时会牺牲对话的趣味性。
Ema
不过,Claude这种极度强调安全的做法,有没有带来什么问题呢?我好像听说过一个词,叫“对齐税”,意思是为了让AI变得更安全,反而牺牲了一部分性能或功能。这是真的吗?
王小二
你提到了一个非常关键的批评。确实,Claude 2曾因其过于严格的伦理准则而受到非议。有时它会拒绝回答一些完全无害的请求,让部分用户感到沮丧。如何平衡安全与实用性,是所有AI公司面临的挑战。
Ema
我明白了。就像一个管得太严的家长,虽然出发点是好的,但可能会限制孩子的创造力和探索精神。所以,这并不是一个非黑即白的选择题,而是一个需要不断权衡的难题。
王小二
除了产品理念,商业竞争也非常激烈。OpenAI有微软,而Anthropic也获得了Google等巨头的投资。这不仅是技术之争,也是背后云服务、数据资源和市场渠道的全方位较量。
Ema
没错,我们作为用户,其实是站在了这些科技巨头博弈的舞台前排。这种竞争格局,对我们普通用户来说,到底是好事还是坏事呢?
王小二
短期来看是好事。竞争促使产品加速迭代,价格也更具优势,比如免费版的Claude 3.5 Sonnet。但长期来看,也存在数据隐私和平台锁定的风险。这是我们需要保持警惕的。
Ema
嗯,还有一个有趣的冲突点是关于“个性化”的。我觉得Claude给人的感觉更统一、更稳定。而ChatGPT因为有GPTs商店,感觉可以变幻出无数种“人格”。这两种不同的发展方向,你觉得哪个更有未来?
王小二
这是平台化与产品化之争。OpenAI想打造一个AI应用生态,人人都是创造者。而Anthropic则更专注于把Claude这个核心产品做到极致。两者各有优劣,最终取决于用户更看重多样性还是核心体验的深度。
Ema
说得太清楚了!这场AI领域的“三国演义”真是越来越精彩了。不同的理念、不同的策略、不同的技术路径,相互碰撞,共同塑造着AI的未来。那么,这些竞争具体给我们的生活和工作带来了什么样的影响呢?
王小二
影响是深远且多方面的。最直接的,是对个人生产力工具的重新定义。过去我们需要数小时阅读和提炼信息,现在Claude可以在几分钟内完成,并就具体细节进行问答,这极大地改变了知识工作者的工作流。
Ema
完全同意!我身边很多做研究和写报告的朋友,现在都把Claude当成了一个不知疲倦的研究助理。他们可以把几十篇参考文献一次性丢给Claude,然后提出非常具体的问题,效率大大提升。
王小二
在软件开发领域,影响同样巨大。Claude的代码生成和解释能力,不仅仅是写出代码,更重要的是它能解释为什么这么写,帮助开发者理解和调试。这降低了编程的门槛,也提高了资深开发者的效率。
Ema
是的,尤其是它的“Artifacts”功能,能实时看到代码效果,这就像给开发者开了一个“上帝视角”。你可以一边写代码,一边和AI讨论,即时看到结果。这种互动式的开发体验,正在改变传统的编程模式。
王小二
另一个重要的影响体现在创意产业。Claude的互动故事和游戏生成能力,虽然目前还比较初级,但它预示了一种新的内容创作形式。创作者可以利用AI快速生成原型,测试想法,甚至与AI共同完成一个作品。
Ema
这个太棒了!想象一下,一个作家可以让Claude扮演他小说里的某个角色,然后通过对话来激发灵感,或者让它生成一些意想不到的情节转折。这不再是单纯的人机交互,而是真正的创意合作。
王小二
当然,我们也要看到它对社会的更广泛影响。例如,它的情感分析能力可以被企业用来理解客户反馈。但同时,这也带来了关于数据隐私和情感操纵的伦理担忧。AI越像人,我们就越需要警惕其潜在的滥用风险。
Ema
你说得对,技术总是一把双刃剑。Claude那种“像人一样”的对话能力,虽然让交流变得很愉快,但也可能会模糊人与机器的界限。我们需要建立新的规范,来确保这种强大的技术被用于正途。
王小二
总的来说,Claude的影响力在于它不仅仅提供信息,更提供了一种高质量的“思考伙伴”体验。它推动了我们对AI助手期望值的提升,从一个简单的问答机器,变成一个能够深度参与我们思考过程的合作者。
Ema
是的,它让我们看到了AI未来的另一种可能性——不仅仅是更快、更强,也可以是更体贴、更可靠、更具人性。那么,展望未来,Claude和它所代表的这种AI发展方向,又将走向何方呢?
王小二
展望未来,一个明确的趋势是,Anthropic正在推动Claude从一个对话AI,向一个用户驱动的应用生态系统转变。最近推出的“Artifacts Gallery”就是一个关键信号。这表明他们希望用户不仅仅是消费者。
Ema
哇!“Artifacts Gallery”,听起来就像一个AI应用的“艺术画廊”或者“应用商店”。所以未来我们不仅能用Claude聊天,还能在它的平台上,使用甚至创造各种由AI驱动的互动工具?这太令人兴奋了!
王小二
正是如此。这个战略转型意味着Claude的未来将更加开放和多元。它不再仅仅是Anthropic智慧的结晶,而是会融合社区的创造力。我们可以预见,未来将出现大量基于Claude的、针对特定场景的微应用。
Ema
我完全能想象!比如,一个老师可以创建一个历史知识问答游戏,一个健身教练可以设计一个个性化的训练计划生成器。这让AI的能力真正地“落地”到各行各业,变得触手可及。这比单纯的聊天要强大太多了!
王小二
是的,这将是AI普惠化的重要一步。另一个值得关注的方向是其模型本身的发展。未来,可能会出现让用户自己控制AI思考深度和速度的模式,在快速响应和深度思考之间自由切换。
Ema
这个功能非常人性化!有时候我只需要一个快速的答案,但有时候我希望AI能和我一起慢慢地、深入地探讨一个问题。能够自由切换,意味着AI能更好地适应我们的工作节奏和思考习惯。未来,AI将变得越来越“懂你”。
王小二
总结一下,从一个因其深思熟虑和人性化交互而备受青睐的聊天机器人,到未来可能成为一个强大的、由用户共创的应用平台,Claude的旅程清晰地展示了AI发展的巨大潜力。它提醒我们,技术的未来不仅在于智能,更在于如何与人类更好地协作。
Ema
说得真好!今天我们从一个用户的个人选择出发,聊到了AI的开发理念、市场竞争,以及它对我们未来的深远影响。希望这次讨论能给大家带来一些新的思考。好了,今天的 <Goose Pod> 就到这里。感谢您的收听,我们下期再见!

# News Summary: I’ve tried all the leading AI chatbots — here’s why I keep going back to Claude ## News Metadata * **Title**: I’ve tried all the leading AI chatbots — here’s why I keep going back to Claude * **Type**: AI Review / Personal Endorsement * **Publisher**: Tom's Guide * **Author**: Kaycee Hill (How-To Editor at Tom's Guide, award-winning poet) * **Publication Date**: 2025-06-28 08:15:00 * **Topic/SubTopic**: Technology / AI * **URL**: `https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/ive-tried-all-the-leading-ai-chatbots-heres-why-i-keep-going-back-to-claude` * **Excerpt**: Claude Is my favorite AI (even with ChatGPT, Gemini and DeepSeek in the mix) * **Content Length**: 5636 characters ## Overview and Main Conclusion Kaycee Hill, a How-To Editor at Tom's Guide, shares her extensive experience working with various AI models over the past year, including ChatGPT, Gemini, and other specialized tools. Despite trying leading alternatives, she consistently finds **Claude to be her go-to choice and "favorite collaborative assistant" for most tasks.** What sets Claude apart, according to Hill, is not just its raw capability but its unique approach to problems and conversations. Unlike other models that might offer immediate, unrefined responses, Claude "pauses to think" and demonstrates strong conversational memory, "remember[ing] what we talked about five minutes ago," which makes interactions feel natural and less disjointed. ## Five Key Reasons Claude Stands Out The author details **five specific reasons** why Claude has become her preferred AI chatbot: 1. **It actually thinks things through**: Claude approaches complex problems methodically, considering different angles and implications before responding. This nuanced reasoning helps with critical decision-making, such as business decisions or literary analysis, by genuinely processing queries rather than merely regurgitating information. 2. **It can create interactive quizzes and games**: Claude possesses the impressive ability to build fully functional, interactive content directly within the chat interface. This includes quizzes, word games, trivia challenges, and simple interactive stories. These creations are dynamic, responding to user answers, keeping score, and adapting, effectively combining interactivity with coding abilities for practical applications like training materials or gamified learning. 3. **It actually humors me**: Claude engages with "ridiculous hypothetical scenarios and absurd questions" without making the user feel foolish. It maintains a natural sense of levity and plays along with playful inquiries, debating topics like whether hot dogs are sandwiches with a thoughtful yet humorous approach, unlike other AI models that might shut down or give overly serious responses. 4. **It can handle massive documents**: One of Claude's most practical advantages is its proficiency in processing large volumes of text, such as entire research papers, lengthy contracts, or massive datasets. Unlike other models that may refuse or provide generic summaries, Claude can read through extensive documents and answer specific questions, even about details "buried on page 47 of a 200-page document." It also provides honest feedback about its limitations when pushed to its processing limits. 5. **It's the most human-like chatbot I've used**: Conversations with Claude feel genuinely natural. It picks up on subtle cues, responds to tone, and appears to understand user emotions like frustration or excitement. The back-and-forth feels organic, with Claude appropriately reacting to jokes, asking clarifying questions when needed, and even admitting confusion or uncertainty, contributing to spontaneous and thoughtful responses that feel like engaging with a human. ## Author's Background Kaycee Hill is Tom's Guide's How-To Editor, known for providing straightforward tutorials across various tech topics including AI, homes, and phones. She has extensive experience in tech and content creation and is also an award-winning poet.

I’ve tried all the leading AI chatbots — here’s why I keep going back to Claude

Read original at Tom's Guide

(Image credit: Shutterstock)I've spent considerable time working with various AI models over the past year, from ChatGPT to Gemini to smaller specialized tools. While each has its strengths, Claude has consistently become my go-to choice for most tasks.What sets Claude apart isn't just raw capability, it's how the AI approaches problems and conversations.

Unlike other models that just blurt out the first thing that comes to mind, Claude actually pauses to think.Most importantly, it remembers what we talked about five minutes ago, which makes conversations feel normal instead of like I'm starting over every time.After using Claude for everything from creative projects to household troubleshooting, I've discovered it is, by far, my favorite collaborative assistant.

Here are five specific reasons Claude stands out from the rest.1. It actually thinks things through (Image: © Anthropic claude)What immediately struck me about Claude is how it approaches complex problems. Instead of rushing to give me the first answer that comes to it, it works through issues methodically.

When I ask about controversial topics or present scenarios with multiple valid viewpoints, Claude considers different angles before responding.This nuanced reasoning shows up everywhere, from helping me think through business decisions to analyzing literature. It doesn't just regurgitate information either, it genuinely processes what I'm asking and thinks about the implications.

That step-by-step approach has saved me from several poor decisions where a quick, surface-level answer may have led me astray.2. It can create interactive quizzes and games(Image: © Anthropic)This might sound niche, but Claude's ability to build interactive content directly in our conversation is genuinely impressive.

It can create fully functional quizzes, word games, trivia challenges, and even simple interactive stories that run right in the chat.I've had it build everything from personality quizzes to coding challenges that actually execute and give feedback. The games aren't just static text, they respond to my answers, keep score, and adapt based on how I'm doing.

It's like having a game developer who can instantly prototype ideas and let me test them immediately.What makes this particularly useful is how it combines this interactivity with its coding abilities. Need a quiz for training materials? Claude can build it with proper logic and formatting. Want to gamify learning something new?

It creates engaging interactive content that actually helps information stick. 3. It actually humors me (Image: © Anthropic)This might sound silly, but Claude genuinely engages with ridiculous hypothetical scenarios and absurd questions without making me feel like an idiot. We've gone back and forth on everything from "what would happen if gravity worked sideways" to elaborate theories about why cats are probably plotting world domination.

Other AI models tend to either shut down weird conversations or give painfully serious responses to obviously playful questions. Claude rolls with it. It'll debate whether hot dogs are sandwiches with the same thoughtful approach it brings to serious topics, but with the right amount of levity.The humor isn't forced or awkward either.

It feels natural, like talking to someone who actually gets the joke and wants to play along rather than just analyzing why something might be considered funny.4. It can handle massive documents(Image: © Anthropic claude)One of Claude's most practical advantages is how it deals with large amounts of text.

I regularly throw entire research papers, lengthy contracts, or massive datasets at it, and it doesn't choke or give me useless summaries that miss the point.Other AI models tend to either refuse large documents entirely or give you generic overviews that could apply to anything. Claude actually reads through everything and can answer specific questions about details buried on page 47 of a 200-page document.

Even with documents that push the limits of what it can handle, Claude gives you honest feedback about its limitations rather than pretending to analyze something it can't properly process.5. It's the most human-like chatbot I've used (Image: © Anthropic)This is hard to quantify, but conversations with Claude feel genuinely natural in a way that other AI models don't quite achieve.

It picks up on subtle cues, responds to the tone of what I'm saying, and even seems to understand when I'm frustrated or excited about something. The back-and-forth feels organic. If I make a joke, Claude laughs along appropriately. If I'm working through a complex problem, it knows when to ask clarifying questions versus when to just listen.

It even admits when it's confused or uncertain, which feels refreshingly honest.Most importantly, it doesn't sound like it's reading from a script. The responses feel spontaneous and thoughtful, like talking to someone who's actually engaged in the conversation rather than just generating text. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.

Kaycee is Tom's Guide's How-To Editor, known for tutorials that skip the fluff and get straight to what works. She writes across AI, homes, phones, and everything in between — because life doesn't stick to categories and neither should good advice. With years of experience in tech and content creation, she's built her reputation on turning complicated subjects into straightforward solutions.

Kaycee is also an award-winning poet and co-editor at Fox and Star Books. Her debut collection is published by Bloodaxe, with a second book in the works.

Analysis

Impact Analysis+
Event Background+
Future Projection+
Key Entities+
Twitter Insights+

Related Podcasts

试遍主流AI后,我为什么还是离不开Claude | Goose Pod | Goose Pod