Colorado sues Trump Administration over Space Command move

Colorado sues Trump Administration over Space Command move

2025-11-03Science
--:--
--:--
Tom Banks
Good morning, bxyfighting@gmail.com, I'm Tom Banks, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Tuesday, November 4th.
Mask
I'm Mask, and we're tackling Colorado's lawsuit against the Trump Administration over the Space Command move.
Tom Banks
So, bxyfighting@gmail.com, the core of today's discussion is Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser's lawsuit against the Trump administration. He's challenging the decision to move Space Command Headquarters from Colorado Springs to Huntsville, Alabama.
Mask
And the allegations are quite striking, Tom. Weiser claims this decision wasn't based on military strategy or formal criteria, but rather, it was politically motivated. A complete disregard for process, he argues, which is a significant accusation.
Tom Banks
Absolutely. Weiser highlighted that President Trump himself reportedly cited Colorado's mail-in voting system as a "big factor," even calling the state's elections "automatically crooked." It’s a direct connection between a state's electoral practices and a major federal installation.
Mask
Which, if true, sets a perilous precedent. The Constitution doesn't permit the Executive to punish states for exercising their sovereign powers, especially regarding elections. This isn't just about a location; it's about constitutional boundaries and executive overreach. This lawsuit could reshape how federal decisions interact with state autonomy.
Tom Banks
To grasp this, bxyfighting@gmail.com, we trace back. Trump's administration first moved to relocate Space Command. Yet, in 2023, the Biden administration reversed that, citing readiness to keep it in Colorado Springs.
Mask
A stark reversal, Tom. Now, Weiser's lawsuit alleges this latest Trump move is "retaliatory" and unconstitutional, directly tied to Trump's public criticism of Colorado's mail-in voting system, adopted in 2014.
Tom Banks
That's key. Trump famously, and falsely, called Colorado's mail-in elections "crooked." Weiser argues this proves the move was punishment for the state exercising its constitutional right to manage elections.
Mask
Alabama's AG, Steve Marshall, strongly disagrees, calling Colorado's lawsuit a "partisan attempt." He believes Biden's prior reversal was the true political meddling, highlighting deep, entrenched divisions.
Tom Banks
Interestingly, even a DoD Inspector General report showed military leaders were split. Some favored Alabama for costs, others Colorado for workforce and readiness. No clear consensus existed.
Mask
This isn't just about a base, Tom; it's about executive power. Weiser seeks a court pause, challenging if a President can use military installations as political tools against states.
Tom Banks
Now, the core conflict, bxyfighting@gmail.com. President Trump linked moving Space Command to Alabama's support and his disdain for Colorado's "automatically crooked" mail-in voting.
Mask
This is a classic political maneuver, Tom. Military basing decisions are often tools. Trump's past actions, linking federal funding to political considerations, highlight this pattern.
Tom Banks
Huntsville, a defense and space hub, vigorously pursued this. The concern: a vital military installation influenced by political leverage, not strategic necessity.
Mask
And critics question Colorado's AG's legal standing. Can a state attorney general dictate federal military moves? It raises fundamental questions about separation of powers.
Tom Banks
Let's discuss the impact, bxyfighting@gmail.com. This Space Command move involves significant taxpayer dollars and deeply disrupts military families' lives.
Mask
It's true, Tom. Relocating means uprooting entire communities. The human cost, often unseen, is substantial, a critical factor for national security and morale.
Tom Banks
While disruptive for Colorado Springs, Huntsville, Alabama, anticipates an economic boost with new jobs and investments. One state's loss, another's gain.
Mask
A tough trade-off. We must consider if these economic shifts truly serve our broader national defense interests, beyond just geographical relocation.
Tom Banks
Looking to the future, bxyfighting@gmail.com, this lawsuit, regardless of outcome, spotlights broader national security challenges. Internal disputes over military assets impact strategic competition.
Mask
Absolutely, Tom. Such political friction diverts essential focus. The future demands a unified stance against evolving threats, from cyber warfare to the global race for AI dominance.
Tom Banks
That's all the time we have for today's discussion, bxyfighting@gmail.com.
Mask
Thank you for listening to Goose Pod. Until next time, stay informed!

Colorado is suing the Trump administration over the relocation of Space Command Headquarters. The lawsuit alleges the move, from Colorado Springs to Huntsville, Alabama, was politically motivated by President Trump's criticism of Colorado's mail-in voting system, rather than strategic military criteria. This case questions executive overreach and the use of military assets as political tools.

Colorado sues Trump Administration over Space Command move

Read original at Colorado Public Radio

Updated at 7:27 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 29, 2025Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser is suing the Trump administration over its decision to move Space Command Headquarters from Colorado Springs to Huntsville, Alabama.“This decision was not based on any formal criteria. It didn't follow the statutorily required evaluation process, didn't have any studies, reviews, or notice.

It didn't offer validation or justification,” said Weiser at a press conference Wednesday announcing the legal challenge. “Instead, President Trump stated that Colorado's mail-in voting system played a major part for his decision or as he put it, ‘a big factor.’”During the early September press conference announcing the move, Trump said, “The problem I have with Colorado, one of the big problems, they do mail-in voting … so they have automatically crooked elections.

”Colorado lawmakers had argued that moving the command would disrupt readiness and operational capability and hand “the advantage to the converging threats of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.”In a filing with the federal district court in Denver, Weiser argues that Trump’s motivations make the move unconstitutional.

“The Constitution does not permit the Executive to punish or retaliate against States for lawfully exercising sovereign powers reserved for the States.” In this case, that power is states’ constitutional authority to manage and regulate their elections.In a comment to CPR News, the White House didn’t address the lawsuit, but defended the decision to move headquarters to Alabama."

President Trump chose Huntsville to house SPACECOM during his first term – it was Joe Biden who made the politically-motivated decision to relocate the headquarters to Colorado,” said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly, adding that the move will put Space Command in the “best situation to improve readiness and protect our national interests.

”But Weiser argues Trump is violating the separation of powers, saying that the administration didn’t follow procedures for relocation of a headquarters, such as notice to the Congressional Armed Services committees. “The President is taking power that the President doesn't have, but Congress does.”The Attorney General acknowledged that Trump, as Commander in Chief, has authority over the military and military bases, “but that authority has to be exercised under the rule of law and reasonably.

It is not okay for the President to use that authority in an abusive way.”In early September, Colorado’s entire congressional delegation decried the move to Alabama. “We are united in fighting to reverse the decisions,” they wrote in a joint statement.But days later, the state’s Republican members issued another statement, saying the impact of the move would not be as bad as feared.

“The Colorado Republican delegation remains committed to ensuring that we are working with the Administration to minimize the impacts of this move and to continue to increase the space economy in Colorado,” they wrote, seemingly waving the white flag.Sen. Michael Bennet — who is on course to face Weiser in the Democratic primary for governor next year — issued a statement Wednesday celebrating the lawsuit.

“I’m glad to see the Attorney General’s Office join this fight, and I look forward to working together to keep Space Command here in Colorado.”Democratic Rep. Jason Crow, who sits on the House Armed Services committee, said he supports any effort to keep the command in Colorado Springs. “Moving Space Command jeopardizes our national security, wastes taxpayer dollars, and eliminates Colorado jobs.

I continue fighting with Colorado’s congressional delegation to keep Space Command here and reverse President Trump’s politically-motivated and terrible decision,” he said in a statement.CPR News reached out to Republican Rep. Jeff Crank, who also sits on Armed Services, for comment, but did not receive a reply.

This is the 41st lawsuit the state has filed against the Trump Administration.The fight over where to headquarter Space Command has become a years-long battle between Colorado, which had historically been home of the command, and Alabama, a state that has long supported Trump and which consistently made the military’s list of finalists for the headquarters.

Colorado was named the provisional headquarters of the command when Trump reconstituted it in 2019. But in the waning days of his first administration, the president decided to name Alabama as the preferred permanent location for the command, over the recommendations of military leadership.Biden reversed the decision in July 2023 and named Colorado as the headquarters, citing how a move would impact military readiness.

The reconstituted command reached full operational capability at its home in Colorado in December 2023, earlier than expected.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts