## Summary of "Donald Trump’s Awful Trade Policy Will Outlast Him" by The Economist This article from **The Economist**, published on August 1st, 2025 (updated 9 hours prior to the report's creation on August 8th, 2025), discusses the evolving nature of America's trade policy under Donald Trump, characterizing it as a shift towards "imperial preference" rather than a rules-based system. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Shift to "Imperial Preference":** America's trade order is moving away from stability, low tariffs, and established rules towards a system where duties are determined by presidential whim. * **"Winning" vs. Reality:** The article asserts that despite Donald Trump's belief that America is "winning," the country is not. * **Tariffs as a Tool:** Tariffs are being used as a primary tool to exert influence and punish trading partners. * **Unpredictability and Arbitrariness:** The imposition of tariffs is described as arbitrary, with countries like Canada and India facing potential duties of **35-50%** simply for having "irritated" Donald Trump. * **"Reciprocal" Tariffs:** On August 7th, "reciprocal" tariffs ranging from **10% to 41%** were imposed on numerous trading partners. This is presented as a consequence of Trump's view that trade deficits are equivalent to "theft." * **Deals to Ward Off Threats:** To avoid these tariffs, the EU, Japan, and South Korea have "hurriedly made deals" with America. * **Long-Lasting Impact:** The article's title suggests that Trump's trade policies, despite his potential departure from office, will have a lasting impact. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **Potential Tariffs on Canada and India:** **35-50%** * **Range of "Reciprocal" Tariffs:** **10% to 41%** * **Date Tariffs Went into Effect:** August 7th, 2025 ### Notable Concerns: * **Erosion of Rules-Based System:** The move away from established trade rules creates instability and unpredictability in global commerce. * **Presidential Whim as Policy Driver:** The reliance on presidential discretion for setting trade policy is a significant concern. * **Misunderstanding of Trade Deficits:** The article criticizes the view that trade deficits equate to theft, highlighting a potentially flawed economic understanding driving policy. ### Context and Interpretation: The article positions Donald Trump's trade policies as a departure from traditional international trade norms. The term "imperial preference" suggests a system where the dominant power (America) favors its own interests and dictates terms to others, much like historical colonial empires. The numerical data on tariffs (35-50% and 10-41%) illustrates the significant and potentially punitive nature of these measures. The urgency with which other nations are making deals underscores the perceived threat and the power imbalance created by these policies. The article's central argument is that this approach, driven by a particular ideology regarding trade deficits and national advantage, is detrimental to global stability and ultimately not beneficial for America, and its effects will persist.
Donald Trump’s awful trade policy will outlast him
Read original at The Economist →Leaders | The new imperial preference He thinks America is winning. It is not Aug 1st 2025 (updated 9h ago)|4 min readWith every passing day, America’s new trading order comes into sharper relief. In place of rules, stability and low tariffs is a system of imperial preference. Duties are not just higher, they are set by presidential whim.
Canada and India have irritated Donald Trump, and so they could face tariffs of 35-50%. To ward off threats the eu, Japan and South Korea have all hurriedly made deals with America. Because Mr Trump regards deficits, bizarrely, as theft, he has imposed “reciprocal” tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on tens of other trading partners, which went into effect on August 7th.
Explore moreLeadersOpinionGlobalisationUnited StatesThis article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “The new imperial preference ”→Why Israel must hold itself to account→Donald Trump’s awful trade policy will outlast him→Buy now, pay later gets a bad rap. But it could be useful →McKinsey and its peers need a strategic rethink →Will an astronomical anomaly challenge the idea of scientific revolutions?
From the August 9th 2025 editionDiscover stories from this section and more in the list of contents⇒Explore the edition
