政府欲让AI打仗并查税

政府欲让AI打仗并查税

2025-07-17Technology
--:--
--:--
纪飞
早上好,国荣。我是纪飞,这是为你制作的 Goose Pod。今天是7月18日,星期五,早上7点01分。
国荣
我是国荣。今天,我们来聊一个很热门的话题:政府欲让AI打仗并查税。听起来是不是有点像科幻电影?
纪飞
我们开始吧。这确实听起来很科幻,但已经是现实了。美国政府正在几乎所有行政部门推广人工智能项目,这背后甚至有埃隆·马斯克的影子。他认为AI在许多任务上能比联邦雇员做得更好。
国荣
没错,就像让机器人去当前线士兵和税务审计员。比如,五角大楼正在用AI帮助军官区分战场上的战斗人员和平民,而美国国税局也在考虑让AI来处理税务审计。这可真是个大新闻啊!
纪飞
这个趋势其实已经酝酿了一段时间,但最近特朗普政府大大加快了步伐。他们在今年一月废除了拜登总统在2023年签署的一项行政命令,那项命令旨在为政府使用AI设立一些“护栏”,以控制风险。
国荣
也就是说,现在的策略是“油门踩到底”?我明白了,这背后的大逻辑就是追求效率最大化。通过自动化来缩减联邦的员工规模,减少等待时间,最终为纳税人省钱。这个想法听起来很诱人,但感觉也充满了风险。
纪飞
完全正确。推动者认为,政府流程虽然有效,但AI能让它更高效。他们甚至觉得,任何任务都应该开放给AI实验,尤其是在战争中。一位前政府工作人员甚至说,“我不相信人类能处理生死攸关的任务”。
国荣
哇,这种观点可真够激进的。这基本上是把巨大的信任交给了算法。这让我想知道,到底是哪些公司在推动这一切?除了马斯克的xAI,肯定还有其他科技巨头参与其中吧?
纪飞
当然。数据挖掘公司 Palantir 就是一个重要的参与者。五角大楼在AI上的投入正在加大,比如他们的核心AI项目 NGA Maven,其用户数量自一月以来翻了一番多,现在全球有超过两万五千名军事和文职人员在使用它。
纪飞
这就引出了核心的矛盾点。一方面,是追求极致效率和所谓“美国AI主导地位”的强大推力;另一方面,则是来自政府技术监督机构和民权组织的深切忧虑。他们担心这种“自动化热潮”会赋予未经充分验证的技术过大的权力。
国荣
是啊,这就像把一辆还在测试阶段的自动驾驶汽车直接开上最繁忙的高速公路。如果AI系统出现故障,可能会不公平地剥夺人们的福利,甚至危害公共安全。有专家指出,AI的能力和公民对政府的期望之间存在“根本性的不匹配”。
纪飞
说得很形象。比如,美国交通安全管理局(TSA)在全美200多个机场使用了面部识别技术来检查身份证件。尽管有研究表明这项技术对有色人种的识别准确率较低,但TSA声称它比人工审查更有效。这就产生了效率与公平之间的紧张关系。
国荣
我明白了。支持者,比如一些前政府技术官员,会说AI能把官员从重复性工作中解放出来,更好地与民众互动。而反对者则认为,如果AI能做决定,并且有机会减少人力,政府肯定会这么做,最终导致大量工作岗位流失。
纪飞
影响已经是显而易见的。以五角大楼的 NGA Maven 系统为例,它的目标是在一小时内对潜在目标做出1000次准确的决策。这不仅改变了战争的速度,也改变了决策的模式,人类的角色越来越像一个监督者,而非决策者。
国荣
这听起来有点吓人。还有退伍军人事务部的例子,他们使用一种名为 REACH VET 的算法来预测退伍军人的自杀风险。但调查发现,该系统优先考虑的是白人男性,而忽略了女性退伍军人特有的风险因素,这可能导致最需要帮助的人被错过。
纪飞
是的,虽然他们最近更新了算法,加入了针对女性的风险因素,但这暴露了AI偏见的现实危险。一个旨在救人的系统,却因为数据和设计的缺陷,可能造成了不公,这就是最直接的社会影响。
纪飞
展望未来,美国政府的AI战略只会更加深入。白宫预计很快会发布一份全面的AI计划。未来的核心问题不再是“是否使用AI”,而是“如何使用AI”,以及如何建立有效的监管和问责机制。
国荣
没错,关键在于找到技术创新和社会责任之间的平衡点。我们需要确保AI是作为辅助人类决策的工具,而不是完全取代人类。否则,我们可能会为了效率而牺牲掉更宝贵的东西,比如公平和正义。
纪飞
今天的讨论就到这里。感谢你收听 Goose Pod。我们明天再见。
国荣
感谢收听Goose Pod,明天见!

## Government Embraces AI for Efficiency and Automation, Sparking Debate on Risks This report from **The Washington Post**, published on **July 15, 2025**, details the Trump administration's aggressive push to integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various federal agencies, a strategy influenced by Elon Musk's vision of AI surpassing human capabilities in government tasks. The initiative aims to streamline operations, reduce costs, and enhance efficiency, but raises significant concerns among government watchdogs regarding the potential for unproven technology to make critical decisions and the impact on the federal workforce. ### Key Findings and Initiatives: * **Broad Agency Adoption:** AI is being explored and implemented across nearly every executive branch agency, including the Pentagon, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). * **Elon Musk's Influence:** Elon Musk's ideas about AI's potential to outperform federal employees are a driving force. His startup, xAI, is offering its chatbot Grok for use by Pentagon personnel. * **Workforce Reduction Goal:** A significant aim of these AI programs is to shrink the federal workforce, mirroring the approach of Musk's "U.S. DOGE Service." * **Efficiency and Cost Savings:** The promised benefits include reduced wait times and lower costs for taxpayers. * **Policy Shift:** President Trump repealed President Biden's 2023 executive order on AI, removing "guardrails" and accelerating AI rollout. A comprehensive White House AI plan is anticipated this month. ### Agency-Specific AI Deployments and Plans: * **Pentagon:** * **NGA Maven:** This core AI program, launched in 2017, has seen its user base **more than double** since January, with over **25,000 U.S. military and civilian personnel** now using it globally. * **Capabilities:** NGA Maven processes imagery from satellites, drones, and other sources to identify potential targets. It is being expanded to interpret audio and text, aiming to create a "live map" of operations and enable **1,000 accurate decisions about potential targets within an hour**. * **Maven Smart System:** Spending on this component, provided by Palantir, has been **more than doubled**, with an additional **$795 million** allocated. It analyzes sensor data to assist in target identification and strike approval, and has been used for logistics planning. * **Commercial Technology Reliance:** Executive orders and memos encourage greater reliance on commercial AI technologies. * **Federal Aviation Administration (FAA):** * **Air Traffic Control:** AI software is being tested to assist air traffic controllers, with the goal of reducing fatigue and distraction. Humans will remain in control, but AI may handle repetitive tasks and airspace monitoring. * **Staffing Impact:** Plans include "planning for less people" due to ongoing staff shortages. * **Other Uses:** AI is being explored for analyzing air traffic and crash data, and predicting aircraft maintenance needs. * **Safety Focus:** The FAA is investigating AI's role in improving safety, particularly in response to recent incidents. Air traffic controllers **do not currently use the technology**, but it's being used to scan incident reports for risks. * **U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO):** * **Patent Examination:** AI is being tested to automate parts of the patent examiner's job. * **Pilot Program:** Patent applicants can opt into a program where AI searches databases for similar patents, emailing applicants a list of the **10 most relevant documents**. * **Mandatory Use:** From **July 21**, examiners will be **"mandatory"** to use an AI-based search tool for similarity checks. * **Report Writing:** AI's ability to write reports and analyze data is being recognized as potentially beneficial for examiners. * **Delayed Rollout:** A new AI search tool's launch was moved quickly, raising concerns about staff understanding and potential delays. * **Transportation Security Administration (TSA):** * **Facial Recognition:** Facial recognition cameras for ID checks have been rolled out in over **200 airports nationwide** since 2022. The agency claims **over 99 percent accuracy** across all demographic groups tested, despite studies showing limitations, particularly for people of color. * **Automated Kiosks:** Experimentation with automated kiosks for pre-checked passengers is underway. * **Manpower Reduction:** While former officials stated AI was meant to enhance efficiency, contractors suggest the Trump administration's acceleration of AI projects could lead to a reduction in TSA officers. * **Internal Revenue Service (IRS):** * **Expanded AI Use:** Beyond internal queries and chatbots, the IRS is looking to off-load more significant tasks to AI, including managing tax audits. * **Centralization Goal:** The "end game" is to centralize IT and HR for the Treasury Department, with AI handling many functions. * **Oversight Concerns:** Concerns have been raised about the lack of oversight in this ambitious effort to centralize IRS work and feed it to AI. * **Modernization Plan:** The Treasury Department states that CIO Sam Corcos is implementing a long-delayed IRS modernization plan. * **Department of Veterans Affairs (VA):** * **Aggressive AI Adoption:** The VA is actively deploying AI, with **hundreds of uses** reported last year. * **REACH VET:** This algorithm prioritizes mental health assistance for veterans at high risk of suicide. An investigation found it previously prioritized White men, particularly those who are divorced or widowed, and did not adequately consider risk factors for female veterans. * **Algorithm Update:** The REACH VET algorithm has been updated to include factors specific to women, such as military sexual trauma, pregnancy, ovarian cysts, and infertility. * **Impact:** Since its launch in **2017**, REACH VET has identified over **117,000 at-risk veterans**. * **"High-Impact" Designation:** The Trump administration has replaced the Biden administration's "safety impacting" or "rights impacting" labels for sensitive programs with "high-impact." ### Notable Risks and Concerns: * **Unproven Technology:** Government watchdogs worry that the administration's automation drive, combined with potential layoffs, could give unproven AI an outsized role. * **Decision-Making Errors:** Elizabeth Laird of the Center for Democracy and Technology warns that if AI drives federal decision-making instead of aiding human experts, glitches could unfairly deprive people of benefits or harm public safety. * **Mismatch with Citizen Expectations:** Laird highlights a "fundamental mismatch" between AI capabilities and what citizens expect from government. * **Disregard for Safety and Staff:** Some federal workers have expressed alarm at the administration's perceived disregard for safety and government staff. * **Facial Recognition Accuracy:** Despite TSA's claims, studies show facial recognition is not perfect and can be less accurate for people of color. ### Expert Opinions: * **Jennifer Pahlka** (former Deputy U.S. Chief Technology Officer): Believes AI can help government get tasks done faster. * **Sahil Lavingia** (former DOGE staffer): Advocates for aggressive AI deployment, stating no task should be off-limits for experimentation, "especially in war," and expressing a lack of trust in humans for "life and death tasks." This report underscores a significant shift in the U.S. government's approach to technology, with a strong emphasis on AI-driven automation under the Trump administration, while simultaneously raising critical questions about its implementation, oversight, and potential societal impact.

The government wants AI to fight wars and review your taxes

Read original at News Source

Elon Musk has receded from Washington but one of his most disruptive ideas about government is surging inside the Trump administration.Artificial intelligence, Musk has said, can do a better job than federal employees at many tasks — a notion being tested by AI projects trying to automate work across nearly every agency in the executive branch.

The Federal Aviation Administration is exploring whether AI can be a better air traffic controller. The Pentagon is using AI to help officers distinguish between combatants and civilians in the field, and said Monday that its personnel would begin using the chatbot Grok offered by Musk’s start-up, xAI, which is trying to gain a foothold in federal agencies.

Artificial intelligence technology could soon play a central role in tax audits, airport security screenings and more, according to public documents and interviews with current and former federal workers.Many of these AI programs aim to shrink the federal workforce — continuing the work of Musk’s U.

S. DOGE Service that has cut thousands of government employees. Government AI is also promised to reduce wait times and lower costs to American taxpayers.Government tech watchdogs worry the Trump administration’s automation drive — combined with federal layoffs — will give unproven technology an outsize role.

If AI drives federal decision-making instead of aiding human experts, glitches could unfairly deprive people of benefits or harm public safety, said Elizabeth Laird, a director at the Washington-based nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology.There is “a fundamental mismatch” between what AI can do and what citizens expect from government, she said.

President Joe Biden in 2023 signed an executive order aimed at spurring government use of AI, while also containing its risks. In January, President Donald Trump repealed that order. His administration has removed AI guardrails while seeking to accelerate its rollout.A comprehensive White House AI plan is expected this month.

“President Trump has long stressed the importance of American AI dominance, and his administration is using every possible tool to streamline our government and deliver more efficient results for the American people,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement.The Washington Post reviewed government disclosures and interviewed current and former federal workers about plans to expand government AI.

Some expressed alarm at the administration’s disregard for safety and government staff. Others saw potential to improve efficiency.“In government, you have so much that needs doing and AI can help get it done and get it done faster,” said Jennifer Pahlka, who was deputy U.S. chief technology officer in President Barack Obama’s second term.

Sahil Lavingia, a former DOGE staffer who pushed the Department of Veterans Affairs to use AI to identify potentially wasteful spending, said government should aggressively deploy the technology becoming so prevalent elsewhere. Government processes are efficient today, he said, “but could be made more efficient with AI.

”Lavingia argued no task should be off limits for experimentation, “especially in war.”“I don’t trust humans with life and death tasks,” he said, echoing a maximalist view of AI’s potential shared by some DOGE staffers.Here’s how AI is being deployed within some government agencies embracing the technology.

Waging warReturn to menuThe Pentagon is charging ahead with artificial intelligence this year. The number of military and civilian personnel using NGA Maven, one of the Pentagon’s core AI programs, has more than doubled since January, said Vice Adm. Frank Whitworth, director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, in a May speech.

The system, launched in 2017, processes imagery from satellites, drones and other sources to detect and identify potential targets for humans to assess. More than 25,000 U.S. military and civilian personnel around the world now use NGA Maven.NGA Maven is being expanded, Whitworth said, to interpret data such as audio and text in conjunction with imagery, offering commanders a “live map” of military operations.

The aim is to help it better distinguish combatants from noncombatants and enemies from allies, and for units using NGA Maven to be able to make 1,000 accurate decisions about potential targets within an hour.The Pentagon’s AI drive under Trump will give tech companies like data-mining firm Palantir a larger role in American military power.

A White House executive order and a Defense Department memo have instructed federal officials to rely more on commercial technology.In May, the Defense Department announced it was more than doubling its planned spending on a core AI system that is part of NGA Maven called Maven Smart System, allocating an additional $795 million.

The software, provided by Palantir, analyzes sensor data to help soldiers identify targets and commanders to approve strikes. It has been used for planning logistics to support deployed troops.Air traffic controlReturn to menuThe Federal Aviation Administration is testing whether AI software can reliably aid air traffic controllers, according to a person with knowledge of the agency’s plans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation.

Humans would remain in the loop, the person said, but AI would help reduce fatigue and distraction. Air traffic control staff would continue to communicate with pilots, for example, but AI might handle repetitive and data-driven tasks, monitoring airspace more generally.Due in part to ongoing staff shortages in air traffic control, the agency’s AI plans include “planning for less people,” the person said.

Other uses for AI being explored at the FAA include analyzing air traffic or crash data and predicting when aircraft are likely to need maintenance, the person said.The FAA sees artificial intelligence as a potential tool to address airline safety concerns that were brought to the fore by the January midair collision that killed more than 60 people near Reagan National Airport.

“The FAA is exploring how AI can improve safety,” the agency said in a unsigned statement, but air traffic controllers do not currently use the technology. That includes using the technology to scan incident reports and other data to find risks around airports with a mixture of helicopter and airplane traffic, the statement said, while emphasizing humans will remain in charge.

“FAA subject matter experts are essential to our oversight and safety mission and that will never change,” the statement said.Examining patentsReturn to menuThe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office wants to test whether part of the job of patent examiners — who review patent applications to determine their validity — can be replaced by AI, according to records obtained by The Post and an agency employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations.

Patent seekers who opt into a pilot program will have their applications fed into an AI search tool that will trawl the agency’s databases for existing patents with similar information. It will email applicants a list of the 10 most relevant documents, with the goal of efficiently spurring people to revise, alter or withdraw their application, the records show.

From July 21, per an email obtained by The Post, it will become “mandatory” for examiners to use an AI-based search tool to run a similarity check on patent applications. The agency did not respond to a question asking if it is the same technology used in the pilot program that will email patent applicants.

The agency employee said AI could have an expansive role at USPTO. Examiners write reports explaining whether applications fall afoul of patent laws or rules. The large language models behind recent AI systems like ChatGPT “are very good at writing reports, and their ability to analyze keeps getting better,” the employee said.

This month, the agency had planned to roll out another new AI search tool that examiners will be expected to use, according to internal documents reviewed by The Post. But the launch moved so quickly that concerns arose that USPTO workers — and some top leaders — did not understand what was about to happen.

Some staff suggested delaying the launch, the documents show, and it is unclear when it will ultimately be released.USPTO referred questions to the Commerce Department, which shared a statement from an unnamed spokesperson. “At the USPTO, we are evaluating how AI and technology can better support the great work of our patent examiners,” the statement said.

Airport security screeningReturn to menuYou may see fewer security staff next time you fly as the Transportation Security Administration automates a growing number of tasks at airport checkpoints.TSA began rolling out facial recognition cameras to check IDs in 2022, a program now live in more than 200 airports nationwide.

Despite studies showing that facial recognition is not perfect and less accurate at identifying people of color, the agency says it is more effective at spotting impostors than human reviewers. A federal report this year found TSA’s facial recognition is more than 99 percent accurate across all demographic groups tested.

The agency says it is experimenting with automated kiosks that allow pre-checked passengers to pass through security with “minimal to no assistance” from TSA officers.During the Biden administration, these and other AI efforts at TSA were aimed at helping security officers be more efficient — not replacing them, said a former technology official at the Department of Homeland Security, TSA’s parent agency, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.

“It frees up the officer to spend more time interacting with a passenger,” the former official said.The new Trump administration has indicated it wants to accelerate AI projects, which could reduce the number of TSA officers at airports, according to Galvin Widjaja, CEO of Austin-based Lauretta.io, a contractor which works with TSA and DHS on tools for screening airport travelers.

“If an AI can make the decision, and there’s an opportunity to reduce the manpower, they’re going to do that,” Widjaja said in an interview.Russ Read, a spokesman for TSA, said in an emailed statement that “the future of aviation security will be a combination of human talent and technological innovation.

”Tax auditsReturn to menuThe Internal Revenue Service has an AI program to help employees query its internal manual, in addition to chatbots for a variety of internal uses. But the agency is now looking to off-load more significant tasks to AI tools.Once the new administration took over, with a mandate from DOGE that targeted the IRS, the agency examined the feasibility of deploying AI to manage tax audits, according to a person familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.

The push to automate work so central to the IRS’s mission underscores a broader strategy: to delegate functions typically left to human experts to powerful software instead. “The end game is to have one IT, HR, etc., for Treasury and get AI to do everything,” the person said.A DOGE official, start-up founder Sam Corcos, has been overseeing work to deploy AI more broadly at the IRS.

But the lack of oversight of an ambitious effort to centralize the work of the IRS and feed it to a powerful AI tool has raised internal worries, the person said.“The IRS has used AI for business functions including operational efficiency, fraud detection, and taxpayer services for a long time,” a Treasury Department spokeswoman said in a statement.

“Treasury CIO Sam Corcos is implementing the fulsome IRS modernization plan that taxpayers have deserved for over three decades.”Caring for veteransReturn to menuIn April, the Department of Veterans Affairs’s top technology official emailed lieutenants with his interpretation of the Trump administration’s new AI policy.

“The message is clear to me,” said Charles Worthington, who serves as VA’s chief technology officer and chief AI officer. “Be aggressive in seizing AI opportunity, while implementing common sense safeguards to ensure these tools are trustworthy when they are used in VA’s most sensitive areas such as benefit determinations and health care.

” The email was published to VA’s website in response to a public records request.VA said it deployed hundreds of uses of artificial intelligence last year, making it one of the agencies most actively tapping AI based on government disclosures. Among the most controversial of these programs has been REACH VET, a scoring algorithm used to prioritize mental health assistance to patients predicted to be at the highest risk of suicide.

Last year, an investigation by the Fuller Project, a nonprofit news organization, found that the system prioritized help to White men, especially those who have been divorced or widowed — groups studies show to be at the highest risk of suicide.VA acknowledged that REACH VET previously did not consider known risk factors for suicide in female veterans, making it less likely that women struggling with thoughts of suicide would be flagged for assistance.

Pete Kasperowicz, a VA spokesman, said in an email that the agency recently updated the REACH VET algorithm to account for several new risk factors specific to women, including military sexual trauma, pregnancy, ovarian cysts and infertility. Since the program launched in 2017, it has helped identify more than 117,000 at-risk veterans, prompting staff to offer them additional support and services, he said.

REACH VET was one of over 300 AI applications that the Biden administration labeled “safety impacting” or “rights impacting” in annual transparency reports. The Trump administration, which has derided the “risk-averse approach of the previous administration,” discontinued those labels and will instead denote sensitive programs as “high-impact.

Analysis

Phenomenon+
Conflict+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

政府欲让AI打仗并查税 | Goose Pod | Goose Pod