人工智能快速锁定复杂双星系统特性

人工智能快速锁定复杂双星系统特性

2025-08-06Technology
--:--
--:--
卿姐
大家早上好,韩纪飞,我是卿姐。欢迎收听专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是8月7日,星期四,早上6点。今天,我们将一起探讨一个星光熠熠的话题。
小撒
大家好,我是小撒!没错,我们要聊的是“人工智能如何快速锁定复杂双星系统的特性”。听起来是不是有点像宇宙级的“非诚勿扰”?AI当红娘,给星星配对,还要快速摸清它们的家底!
卿姐
小撒的比喻总是这么别出心裁。不过,这个“红娘”可不简单。文章里提到,人工智能的介入,能将原本需要数周甚至数年才能完成的计算,缩短到“在单台笔记本电脑上仅需几分钟或几秒钟”。这是一个革命性的突破。
小撒
何止是突破,简直是开了“天眼”!您想啊,我们看星星,那真是“迢迢牵牛星,皎皎河汉女”。距离太远了,根本看不清。文章里打了个比方,如果太阳是美国东海岸的一个篮球,那最近的恒星“比邻星”,就是夏威夷的一个橙子。用望远镜看橙子,太难了!
卿姐
正是如此。“天涯若比邻”在天文学上是一种奢望。所以,直接测量单个恒星的质量、半径这些基本属性,极其困难。但宇宙自有其巧妙之处,它为我们准备了“双星”这个绝佳的研究对象,它们就像宇宙中的参照物,为我们揭示了恒星的秘密。
小撒
对!单身不好研究,那就研究“情侣”!文章说,超过一半像太阳这样的恒星都处于双星或者多星系统里。它们互相绕着一个公共的质心旋转,这不就是宇宙级的双人舞嘛!而AI的加入,让这场舞会的每一个细节都无所遁形。
卿姐
这支双人舞,跳的是开普勒的节拍。通过观察它们的舞步——也就是轨道周期和大小,我们就能推算出它们的总质量。但舞者的具体“身材”如何,就需要更精妙的观察了。而AI,正是那个能瞬间看透一切的超级评委。
小撒
没错!以前的评委,得拿着小本本,一项一项算,算个几百年。现在AI评委一上场,扫一眼数据,啪!所有信息——质量、半径、温度、亮度,全出来了!这效率,简直让天文学家们喜大普奔啊!我们先从头说起,这双星系统到底是怎么被我们认识的?
卿姐
“譬如朝露,去日苦多”,人类对星空的探索,是一场漫长而浪漫的接力。早在望远镜发明之初,人们就注意到了天空中那些靠得很近的“双星”。1650年,里乔利就发现北斗七星中的开阳星,其实是两颗星。但起初,大家只觉得是偶然的视觉巧合。
小撒
就像我们在大街上看到两个人站在一起,不能断定他们就认识。直到1767年,一位叫约翰·米歇尔的英国人,他是个数学家,用统计学的方法证明,这么多星星成双成对,绝不是巧合!它们之间肯定有“猫腻”!这个“猫腻”就是万有引力。
卿姐
是的,科学的魅力就在于从偶然中发现必然。后来,天文学家威廉·赫歇尔在1803年,通过常年观测,确认了这些双星确实在互相绕转,就像一对舞伴。从此,“物理双星”的概念才真正确立,它们是被引力束缚在一起的命运共同体。
小撒
那我们是怎么“称量”这些星星的呢?文章里提到了开普勒谐和定律,说它像一个“称量天体的秤”。这听起来太玄乎了,卿姐,这秤怎么用啊?难道把星星放到秤盘上吗?
卿姐
小撒你真会开玩笑。这个“秤”是无形的。就如同那句诗,“只在此山中,云深不知处”。我们虽不能亲临,却能通过智慧来感知。开普勒第三定律,也就是谐和定律,揭示了行星轨道周期的平方与其轨道半长轴的立方成正比。这个关系,同样适用于双星系统。
小撒
我来翻译一下!这就像玩跷跷板!两个体重差不多的小朋友,得坐在离中间差不多远的地方。如果一个胖点儿,一个瘦点儿,那胖的就得往中间坐,瘦的就得往外坐。恒星也是一个道理!质量大的,离中心近,转得慢;质量小的,离中心远,转得快。
卿姐
这个比喻非常生动。天文学家通过测量两颗星各自的运动速度,就能推算出它们的轨道大小,进而根据开普勒定律,计算出它们的总质量。如果还能知道它们各自的轨道大小,就能算出它们各自的质量。这把宇宙之秤,称量的正是引力。
小撒
明白了!质量问题解决了!那半径呢?总不能还用跷跷板来比喻吧?难道看谁的屁股大?这可怎么看?文章提到了一个特别幸运的情况,叫“食双星”。这又是什么?听起来好像很好吃。
卿姐
“食双星”,确实是一个很形象的词。宇宙中的双星轨道方向是随机的。有时,它们的轨道平面恰好与我们的视线平行。这就像是命运的安排,让我们有机会看到一幕宇宙皮影戏。当一颗星转到另一颗前面时,就会挡住对方的光,形成“星食”。
小撒
哦!我懂了!就像日食月食一样!通过观察光被遮挡了多少,以及遮挡过程持续了多久,我们就能用简单的几何学知识,反推出这两颗星的大小,也就是半径!这可真是“众里寻他千百度,蓦然回首,那人却在,灯火阑珊处”的幸运啊!
卿姐
正是这种万里挑一的幸运,为我们测量恒星半径提供了钥匙。虽然食双星只占所有恒星的1%到2%,但宇宙浩瀚,其绝对数量依然庞大,仅在银河系中就有数亿之多。它们是天体物理学中名副其实的“标准烛光”,为我们校准着宇宙的尺度。
小撒
所以你看,天文学家就是这么一群“偷窥者”,通过各种蛛丝马迹来拼凑宇宙的真相。从最早用眼睛看,到后来用光谱分析,再到利用幸运的“食双星”,方法越来越高级。但问题也来了,既然方法都有了,为什么还说测量难呢?
卿姐
“看似寻常最奇崛,成如容易却艰辛”。即便有了食双星这样的理想模型,现实也远比理论复杂。恒星并非完美的球体,它们在高速自转时会变扁,在伴星的引力拉扯下会被拉伸变形,就像一个被捏过的橡皮泥。
小撒
哦,不是标准的圆球了!这计算量一下就上去了。而且它们还会互相“发光发热”,互相“照耀”,表面可能还有“星星的雀斑”——星斑和磁场。再加上它们的自转轴可能还是倾斜的!我的天,这哪是双人舞,这简直是两个醉汉在跳舞,你根本不知道他们的下一步会迈向哪里!
卿姐
你的比喻虽然夸张,但点出了问题的核心。为了模拟这些复杂的效应,天文学家们开发的物理模型,包含了大量的“旋钮和开关”,也就是可调参数。比如恒星的形状、大小、轨道参数、发光情况等等。每一个参数的微小变动,都会产生不同的观测结果。
小撒
这就是个排列组合的噩梦啊!文章说,要确保结果可信,需要尝试数千万种参数组合。而每计算一种组合的预测结果,就需要几分钟。数千万乘以几分钟……我的天,这得算到地老天荒啊!文章给出了答案:超过200年的计算时间!就为了解算一个双星系统!
卿姐
是的,这就是所谓的“计算瓶颈”。即便使用超级计算机集群,把成百上千台计算机连在一起算,也需要三个星期甚至更久。这就是为什么迄今为止,我们只有大约300颗恒星的精确基本参数。这在亿万星辰中,不过是沧海一粟。
小撒
太难了!这就像是要破解一个宇宙级的密码箱,密码的位数太多了,只能一个一个试。而且物理模型本身已经被优化到了极致,没法再快了。所以,天文学家们迫切需要一种全新的方法,来打破这个“计算瓶颈”。于是,AI闪亮登场了!
卿姐
是的,“山重水复疑无路,柳暗花明又一村”。人工智能,特别是深度学习神经网络,为这个问题带来了全新的曙光。研究团队的想法很巧妙:既然物理模型计算得慢,那我们能不能用一个速度极快的AI模型来替代它呢?
小撒
这不就是找个“枪手”嘛!AI这个“学霸枪手”是怎么培养的呢?研究团队先用那个慢得要死的物理模型,计算了数亿个假设的双星系统的观测结果,形成一个巨大的数据库。这就像是给AI准备了海量的“模拟试题”和“标准答案”。
卿姐
正是如此。神经网络的核心就是“映射”,它能学习从输入到输出的对应关系。在这个案例中,就是从双星的物理参数(输入),映射到望远镜的观测结果(输出)。通过海量数据的“投喂”和训练,AI逐渐学会了物理模型的所有精髓。
小撒
而且学得还特别快!一旦这个AI“学霸”训练完成,它就不再需要去理解背后复杂的物理过程了。你给它一组参数,它凭借“肌肉记忆”或者说“网络直觉”,在几分之一秒内就能给出和物理模型算几分钟一样的结果!这速度提升了多少倍?一百万倍!
卿姐
一百万倍的提升,意味着原本在超级计算机上需要数周的工作,现在用一台笔记本电脑几分钟就能完成。这意味着,我们有能力在几个月内,分析完有史以来观测到的所有食双星系统。这不仅仅是量的飞跃,更是我们认知宇宙能力上的质变。
小撒
当然,关键问题是,这个AI“枪手”靠谱吗?会不会算错了?文章里也提到了,这篇新论文的核心,就是证明AI模型和物理模型的结果高度一致,在超过99%的参数空间里,结果都是相同的。这说明AI的性能是稳健可靠的。可以放心上岗了!
卿姐
“工欲善其事,必先利其器”。现在,这件名为AI的“神器”已经铸成。研究团队的下一步,就是将它部署到所有已观测到的食双星数据上。一个关于恒星基本属性的巨大宝库,即将向我们敞开大门。我们对恒星演化、星系形成的理解,都将因此迈上新的台阶。
小撒
而且,这种方法的影响力远不止于天文学!文章最后提到,这种用AI替代复杂物理模型的思路,可以应用到任何存在“计算瓶颈”的领域。比如天气预报、股票市场分析、材料科学……这简直是为整个科学界提供了一个“超级加速器”啊!
卿姐
是的,它揭示了一种新的科研范式。在未来,AI或许不仅仅是工具,更会成为我们探索未知的伙伴。它能从我们无法想象的浩瀚数据中,洞察出隐藏的规律,引领我们走向更深刻的真实。这大概就是科学与智能结合,最激动人心的前景。
卿姐
从仰望星空的好奇,到解构宇宙的智慧,人类的探索从未停止。今天,AI为我们点亮了一盏新的明灯。今天的讨论就到这里了。感谢您收听Goose Pod。
小撒
我们明天同一时间再见!祝您有美好的一天!

## AI Revolutionizes Binary Star Property Measurement **News Title:** Binary star systems are complex astronomical objects − a new AI approach could pin down their properties quickly **Report Provider:** Space.com (Article originally published at The Conversation) **Author:** Andrej Prša (Professor of Astrophysics and Planetary Science at Villanova University) **Publication Date:** August 4, 2025, 15:00:00 This news report details a significant advancement in astrophysics: the application of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically deep-learning neural networks, to overcome the immense computational challenges in measuring the fundamental properties of binary star systems. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **The Challenge:** Measuring basic stellar properties like mass, radius, temperature, and brightness for stars is extremely difficult due to their vast distances. Binary star systems, while offering a way to infer these properties, present complex computational hurdles. * **Traditional Method Limitations:** * **Mass Measurement:** Kepler's harmonic law allows astronomers to calculate the total mass of a binary system using orbital size and period. The relative speeds and orbital distances of the stars indicate their individual masses. * **Radius Measurement:** Radii are determined by observing "eclipsing binaries," where the orbital plane aligns with Earth's line of sight, causing stars to eclipse each other. The shapes of these eclipses provide geometric data for radius calculations. * **Computational Bottleneck:** Analyzing these eclipsing binaries requires complex computer models that simulate various stellar properties. These models are computationally intensive, taking minutes per prediction. To ensure accuracy, millions of parameter combinations are needed, leading to hundreds of millions of minutes of compute time, equivalent to over 200 years. Even with computer clusters, solving for a single binary can take three or more weeks, limiting accurate measurements to only about 300 stars. * **AI-Driven Solution:** The research team has developed an AI-based model using deep-learning neural networks to replace the computationally expensive physical models. * **Methodology:** A massive database of predictions for hypothetical binary stars was generated by varying their properties. These predictions were then used to train neural networks to map observable features of eclipsing binaries to their underlying properties. * **Efficiency:** The AI model can achieve the same results as the physical model in a tiny fraction of a second, representing a millionfold runtime reduction. This transforms a process taking weeks on a supercomputer to mere minutes on a single laptop. * **Impact and Benefits:** * **Scalability:** The AI approach allows for the analysis of hundreds of thousands of binary systems within weeks on a computer cluster. * **Accessibility:** Fundamental properties for all observed eclipsing binary stars could be obtained within a month or two. * **Accuracy:** The AI-driven model has demonstrated robust performance, yielding the same results as the physical model across over 99% of parameter combinations. * **Broader Applicability:** The underlying principle of replacing complex physical models with faster AI models is applicable to any complex physical modeling task, with potential applications in fields like weather forecasting and stock market analysis. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **Eclipsing Binaries:** Account for approximately **1% to 2%** of all stars. * **Compute Time Reduction:** **Millionfold** reduction in runtime. * **AI Model Accuracy:** Yields the same results as the physical model across over **99%** of parameter combinations. * **Traditional Compute Time:** Over **200 years** of computer time for millions of parameter combinations. * **Traditional Binary Solution Time:** **Three or more weeks** on a computer cluster for a single binary. * **Stars with Accurate Measurements (Traditional):** Approximately **300**. * **AI Analysis Time:** **Mere minutes** on a single laptop, or **a couple of weeks** for hundreds of thousands of systems on a computer cluster. ### Recommendations: The research team's next step is to **deploy the AI on all observed eclipsing binaries**, indicating a clear path towards a comprehensive analysis of these celestial objects. ### Significant Trends: This development highlights a significant trend in scientific research: the increasing reliance on and effectiveness of AI in tackling complex computational problems that were previously intractable. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: The primary challenge mentioned is **ensuring that AI results truly match the physical model**, a concern that the team's new paper addresses by demonstrating high accuracy. ### Material Financial Data: No material financial data is presented in this report.

Binary star systems are complex astronomical objects − a new AI approach could pin down their properties quickly

Read original at Space.com

A binary star system has two stars revolving around one center of mass.(Image credit: International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/J. da Silva (Spaceengine))This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.

Stars are the fundamental building blocks of our universe. Most stars host planets, like our Sun hosts our solar system, and if you look more broadly, groups of stars make up huge structures such as clusters and galaxies. So before astrophysicists can attempt to understand these large-scale structures, we first need to understand basic properties of stars, such as their mass, radius and temperature.

But measuring these basic properties has proved exceedingly difficult. This is because stars are quite literally at astronomical distances. If our Sun were a basketball on the East Coast of the U.S., then the closest star, Proxima, would be an orange in Hawaii. Even the world’s largest telescopes cannot resolve an orange in Hawaii.

Measuring radii and masses of stars appears to be out of scientists’ reach.Enter binary stars. Binaries are systems of two stars revolving around a mutual center of mass. Their motion is governed by Kepler’s harmonic law, which connects three important quantities: the sizes of each orbit, the time it takes for them to orbit, called the orbital period, and the total mass of the system.

I’m an astronomer, and my research team has been working on advancing our theoretical understanding and modeling approaches to binary stars and multiple stellar systems. For the past two decades we’ve also been pioneering the use of artificial intelligence in interpreting observations of these cornerstone celestial objects.

Measuring stellar massesAstronomers can measure orbital size and period of a binary system easily enough from observations, so with those two pieces they can calculate the total mass of the system. Kepler’s harmonic law acts as a scale to weigh celestial bodies.Think of a playground seesaw. If the two kids weigh about the same, they’ll have to sit at about the same distance from the midpoint.

If, however, one child is bigger, he or she will have to sit closer, and the smaller kid farther from the midpoint.Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!It’s the same with stars: The more massive the star in a binary pair, the closer to the center it is and the slower it revolves about the center.

When astronomers measure the speeds at which the stars move, they can also tell how large the stars’ orbits are, and as a result, what they must weigh.A close binary star system happens when several planets orbit the brighter star out of the pair. (Image credit: Robin Dienel, courtesy of the Carnegie Institution for Science)Measuring stellar radiiKepler’s harmonic law, unfortunately, tells astronomers nothing about the radii of stars.

For those, astronomers rely on another serendipitous feature of Mother Nature.Binary star orbits are oriented randomly. Sometimes, it happens that a telescope’s line of sight aligns with the plane a binary star system orbits on. This fortuitous alignment means the stars eclipse one another as they revolve about the center.

The shapes of these eclipses allow astronomers to find out the stars’ radii using straightforward geometry. These systems are called eclipsing binary stars.More than half of all Sun-like stars are found in binaries, and eclipsing binaries account for about 1% to 2% of all stars. That may sound low, but the universe is vast, so there are lots and lots of eclipsing systems out there – hundreds of millions in our galaxy alone.

By observing eclipsing binaries, astronomers can measure not only the masses and radii of stars but also how hot and how bright they are.An illustration showing a binary star pair in the Auriga constellation. The two stars are roughly the same mass and diameter and around every 47 hours one of the stars partially eclipses the other as seen from Earth.

(Image credit: Pablo Carlos Budassi)Complex problems require complex computingEven with eclipsing binaries, measuring the properties of stars is no easy task. Stars are deformed as they rotate and pull on each other in a binary system. They interact, they irradiate one another, they can have spots and magnetic fields, and they can be tilted this way or that.

To study them, astronomers use complex models that have many knobs and switches. As an input, the models take parameters – for example, a star’s shape and size, its orbital properties, or how much light it emits – to predict how an observer would see such an eclipsing binary system.Computer models take time.

Computing model predictions typically takes a few minutes. To be sure that we can trust them, we need to try lots of parameter combinations – typically tens of millions.This many combinations requires hundreds of millions of minutes of compute time, just to determine basic properties of stars. That amounts to over 200 years of computer time.

Computers linked in a cluster can compute faster, but even using a computer cluster, it takes three or more weeks to “solve,” or determine all the parameters for, a single binary. This challenge explains why there are only about 300 stars for which astronomers have accurate measurements of their fundamental parameters.

The models used to solve these systems have already been heavily optimized and can’t go much faster than they already do. So, researchers need an entirely new approach to reducing computing time.Using deep learningOne solution my research team has explored involves deep-learning neural networks. The basic idea is simple: We wanted to replace a computationally expensive physical model with a much faster AI-based model.

First, we computed a huge database of predictions about a hypothetical binary star – using the features that astronomers can readily observe – where we varied the hypothetical binary star’s properties. We are talking hundreds of millions of parameter combinations. Then, we compared these results to the actual observations to see which ones best match up.

AI and neural networks are ideally suited for this task.In a nutshell, neural networks are mappings. They map a certain known input to a given output. In our case, they map the properties of eclipsing binaries to the expected predictions. Neural networks emulate the model of a binary but without having to account for all the complexity of the physical model.

We train the neural network by showing it each prediction from our database, along with the set of properties used to generate it. Once fully trained, the neural network will be able to accurately predict what astronomers should observe from the given properties of a binary system.Compared to a few minutes of runtime for the physical model, a neural network uses artificial intelligence to get the same result within a tiny fraction of a second.

Two stars revolve around each other in a binary system. (Image credit: NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2)Reaping the benefitsA tiny fraction of a second works out to about a millionfold runtime reduction. This brings the time down from weeks on a supercomputer to mere minutes on a single laptop.

It also means that we can analyze hundreds of thousands of binary systems in a couple of weeks on a computer cluster.This reduction means we can obtain fundamental properties – stellar masses, radii, temperatures and luminosities – for every eclipsing binary star ever observed within a month or two.

The big challenge remaining is to show that AI results really give the same results as the physical model.This task is the crux of my team’s new paper. In it we’ve shown that, indeed, the AI-driven model yields the same results as the physical model across over 99% of parameter combinations. This result means the AI’s performance is robust.

Our next step? Deploy the AI on all observed eclipsing binaries.Best of all? While we applied this methodology to binaries, the basic principle applies to any complex physical model out there. Similar AI models are already speeding up many real-world applications, from weather forecasting to stock market analysis.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.Andrej Prša is a professor of Astrophysics and Planetary Science at Villanova University

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts