AI时代,我们如何培养大学生?

AI时代,我们如何培养大学生?

2025-09-06Technology
--:--
--:--
雷总
韩纪飞早上好,我是雷总,欢迎收听专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是9月7日,星期日。AI时代,我们该如何培养大学生?这个话题,我们今天得好好聊聊。
李白
吾乃李白。天工智能,变幻莫测,动摇学宫之基石。今日有幸与雷总对酌,共探此中玄机,善莫大焉。
雷总
好,那我们开始吧。李白先生,您看,现在的情况是,AI,特别是像ChatGPT这样的生成式AI,已经成了教育领域的一个“引爆点”。从2022年11月它发布以来,无论是中小学还是大学,都受到了巨大的冲击。
李白
引爆点?此言甚妙。恰如平地一声春雷,惊醒万千桃李。学子们挥笔之间,不再是圣贤文章,而是机关生成之辞藻。此番景象,可谓“前无古人”。
雷总
没错。现在的大学生,可以说他们的整个大学生涯都有AI的陪伴。用AI写论文、做题,已经不是什么新鲜事了。有个数据说,现在有十分之三的K-12老师每周都会用AI,学生就更不用说了,AI几乎成了他们的万能助手。
李白
“万能”二字,实则堪忧。昔日囊萤映雪,凿壁偷光,所求为何?乃是亲手格物致知之乐。如今万事皆可问于机关,人脑岂不日渐怠惰,灵性尽失?此乃“师道之债”也。
雷总
您说的“师道之债”很有意思。AI确实暴露了我们现有教育模式的一些问题。比如,过去那种填鸭式的、只看结果不看过程的教学,现在被AI彻底打穿了。教授们可能还没完全意识到学生使用AI的普遍程度,这中间存在一个“盲点”。
李白
盲点者,非目盲,乃心盲也。师者传道授业,若不知学子所思所想、所用何物,则如隔靴搔痒,教化无力。长此以往,学府将成“无根之木,无源之水”。
雷总
所以,现在大家都在讨论,教育实践需要重新设计了。澳大利亚的专员不是也强调,我们有一种“紧迫感”,要去培养国民的认知和批判性思维能力吗?他们特别提到了要支持人文学科和社会科学。这和AI时代的挑战不谋而合。
李白
善哉!此乃远见之论。机关之术,可为器,不可为道。真正之学问,在于明辨是非,洞察人心,此乃人文社科之精髓。舍本逐末,纵有屠龙之技,亦不过是凡夫俗子。
雷总
完全同意。我们不能只教学生怎么用工具,更要教他们为什么用,以及用了之后会带来什么。现在这种有点像“自由混战”的局面,必须得到改变。学校需要明确的指导方针,而不是让老师和学生自己摸索。
李白
正是。无规矩不成方圆。学府当立明法,或允之,或禁之,或引之。使其知可为与不可为。方能在这智能浪潮之中,稳坐钓鱼台,而不被洪流吞噬。
雷总
说到这里,我想到了一个很有意思的现象。很多人觉得,应对AI时代,我们应该加倍重视STEM,也就是科学、技术、工程和数学。但很多科技大佬,反而建议我们回归一种非常古老的教育模式:通识教育。
李白
通识教育?此言深得我心。此非古老,乃是经典。遥想古希腊,先贤论道,所求乃是人之为人的德行与智慧。后有中世纪大学之“七艺”——文法、逻辑、修辞、算术、几何、天文、音乐,此皆为通识之源流也。
雷总
对,就是Liberal Arts Education。它不只是教你怎么做一个工程师或者程序员,而是培养你全面的知识和品格。您看,前Facebook的高管就说,他觉得大家不用再学编程了,因为工程师的角色很快就会变成监督者。
李白
哈哈,此人颇有见地!正如剑客对决,上乘者非以剑招繁复取胜,乃是以剑意、心境制敌。编程之术,乃是“剑招”,而通识教育所授,则是那无形的“剑意”与“心境”。AI可习得万千剑招,却难解其中真意。
雷总
没错。霍尼韦尔的首席信息官也说,“未来属于高情商的领导者”,因为AI会让智商普及化。还有AI专家更直接地指出,在AI时代,培养孩子的目标不再是经济生产力,而是让他们成为一个好人,拥有智慧和美德。
李白
此言正合吾意!“德者,才之帅也。”机器虽有神算之力,却无恻隐之心、羞恶之心、是非之心。人之可贵,正在于此。若教育只重“才”而轻“德”,则与草木何异?培养出的不过是善用工具的“空心人”。
雷总
所以,当机器越来越快、越来越强的时候,我们人类最宝贵的特质,可能不是技术能力,而是道德和人际交往能力。记者史蒂文·利维说,我们每个人都有一种超能力,是电脑永远无法拥有的,那就是我们的人性。
李白
人性之光,如日月经天,江河行地,永恒不灭。通识教育,正是点燃这人性之光的火炬。它教人读诗、赏画、听乐,与先贤对话,叩问“何为良善生活?何为真理正义?”此等学问,方能滋养灵魂。
雷总
是的,这种教育模式的核心是深度参与和对话。比如,花上几天时间去啃一本像《堂吉诃德》这样的名著,然后花两个小时去深入讨论。这种体验是AI给不了的。AI可以给你一个摘要,但无法替代你思考和感受的过程。
李白
然也。浅尝辄止,如蜻蜓点水,终不得其味。唯有沉潜其中,反复咀嚼,方能品出真意。与同窗好友,于饭食之间,继续纵论书中乾坤,此等乐趣,非机关速成所能比拟。智慧的获得,本就需“慢火慢炖”。
雷总
这种“慢”还能锻炼我们的专注力,就像体育锻炼能增强体力一样。而且,在小型的文理学院里,师生关系紧密,大家面对面交流思想,形成一种独特的社群文化。这种文化本身就是一种“技术”,一种凝聚思想和心灵的技术。
李白
此乃“道场”也。众人围炉而坐,切磋琢磨,砥砺思想。真知灼见,在往来交锋中迸发。此情此景,岂是面对冰冷屏幕所能及?科技之便利,有时反倒疏远了人心。而这“道场”,恰是重聚人心的熔炉。
雷总
所以,一个很有趣的结论是:在一个日益技术化的世界里,最好的准备方式之一,可能就是花四年时间,在某种程度上远离技术的影响。St. John's College的一位校友,现在在谷歌DeepMind工作,她就说,这种教育给了她一种“智识上的无畏”。
李白
“智识无畏”,好一个“无畏”!胸中自有丘壑,何惧外界风雷?读万卷书,行万里路,心中有了定盘针,面对未知之境,自然从容不迫。纵使初见AI如见神明,亦能以数周之功,洞其究竟。此乃真学问赋予之底气。
雷总
不过,李白先生,理想很美好,现实却很骨感。现在最大的一个冲突点,或者说争论,就是有学生会问:“既然我复制粘贴就能搞定一切,我为什么还要努力学习呢?”这个问题非常尖锐。
李白
此问虽出于少年之口,却如暮鼓晨钟,振聋发聩!此非懒惰之问,乃是向学问本身之诘问。若学问之价值,仅在于寻得一个答案,那么AI此物,确已让万卷书黯然失色。
雷总
是的,ChatGPT推出两个月,用户就达到了1亿,速度惊人。在职场,有调查显示75%的员工在用AI节省工作时间。甚至有三分之二的商业领袖说,他们不会雇佣没有AI技能的求职者。这就给学生带来了巨大的压力和困惑。
李白
此乃“利”字当头,驱人若鹜。然“君子喻于义,小人喻于利”。若教育只为稻粱谋,则与匠人培训何异?学子们见捷径而趋之,实属人之常情。然为师者,当指明通天大道,而非乡间小径。
雷总
所以,整个社会对AI教育的态度也很分裂。有个民意调查显示,公众意见基本上是一半一半,一半人支持,一半人反对。甚至最新的数据显示,大家对AI在教育中的各种应用,比如备课、辅导、作业帮助等,支持率都在下降。
李白
人心向背,可见一斑。初见此物,以为是开天辟地之神器,人人追捧。久而观之,方见其利弊共生。正如水能载舟,亦能覆舟。民众之忧虑,正在于此舟是否会倾覆我等千年积累之求知航船。
雷总
没错。一方面,AI可以个性化学习,减轻老师负担,这都是实实在在的好处。但另一方面,学术诚信、算法偏见、数据隐私,还有最重要的,批判性思维的削弱,这些担忧也同样真实。有学生自己都说:“我觉得这让我变笨了,但我不得不用,因为我有太多事要做。”
李白
哀哉!“为学日益,为道日损。”此言非虚。学子为繁务所迫,借AI以求速成,看似“日益”,实则其独立思考之“道”已然“日损”。此非学生之过,乃是教育之“病”。病在急功近利,病在以量取胜。
雷总
是的,所以很多人呼吁,我们需要一个平衡的方案。AI应该是增强人类学习的工具,而不是替代品。哈佛的研讨会就提出,获取信息不等于学习,更不等于主动和持续的学习。有效的学习,恰恰需要经历困难,需要独立思考,而这些正是AI想要“抄近路”绕过的地方。
雷总
说到这里,我想到了一个很有意思的现象。很多人觉得,应对AI时代,我们应该加倍重视STEM,也就是科学、技术、工程和数学。但很多科技大佬,反而建议我们回归一种非常古老的教育模式:通识教育。
雷总
这种冲突带来的影响已经非常明显了。首先,课程和评估方式正在被重塑。传统的写论文模式,现在被认为可能会导致“认知脱节”或者说“大脑生锈”,因为学生可以轻易用AI完成。所以很多老师开始尝试口头答辩、项目制学习这些新方法。
李白
此乃正道。纸上谈兵,终觉浅。真才实学,需当堂对质,应对如流。如此,滥竽充数者无所遁形。亦可逼迫学子深思熟虑,将知识内化于心,而非仅仅存储于外物。
雷总
其次,对“AI素养”的定义也在变化。以前我们觉得,有批判性思维就够了,能辨别AI信息的真假就行。但现在大家意识到,这还不够,学生还需要理解AI系统背后嵌入的权力结构。比如,AI的训练数据由谁提供?它的价值观是什么?
李白
善哉!此为“知其然,亦知其所以然”。不察其源,则如无根之萍,随波逐流。AI此物,非天外飞仙,乃是人造之器。其背后之人心、资本、权谋,皆需洞若观火。否则,我等皆将成为被无形之线操控的木偶。
雷总
对就业市场的影响也很大。AI已经开始被用来筛选简历,甚至生成简历,变成了一场“机器人大战机器人”的游戏。这让传统的简历变得越来越不重要。大学的学位和成绩单,如何证明一个人的真正能力,这是个大问题。
李白
“试玉要烧三日满,辨材须待七年期”。识人之道,岂是一纸文书所能穷尽?冰冷机关,只能度量履历之长短,难测人心之温度与才情之光华。未来取士,或当重返“面试”之道,观其言,察其行。
雷总
还有一个更深远的影响,就是学者角色的转变。过去,学者是知识的生产者。现在,AI可以轻松地综合信息,学者的角色越来越像一个“策展人”,负责筛选、解读和组织知识。甚至有研究发现,ChatGPT发布后,学术论文的可读性下降了,语言也变得更趋同。
李白
此诚为学界之隐忧。若人人言必称AI,文风皆如出一辙,则百家争鸣之盛况何在?思想之火花,贵在碰撞与不同。若天下文章皆为“标准”之作,虽看似工整,实则灵气尽失,思想僵化,乃是学术之大不幸。
雷总
那么,未来会怎么样呢?有一种观点认为,AI会逐渐渗透到现有大学的方方面面,导致教师队伍,特别是兼职教师,数量会大幅减少。学生会更喜欢用AI进行个性化学习,比如AI生成的讲座、全天候的辅导等等。
李白
此景可忧亦可喜。忧者,师生亲炙之乐或将不存,杏坛春风,化为数字寒流。喜者,学海无涯,AI为舟,学子可日行万里,遍览全球之学问。然缺了良师为舵手,恐有迷航之险。
雷总
还有一种更激进的设想,就是出现全新的、由AI运营的“AI大学”。这种大学几乎没有人类员工,成本极低,专门服务于那些有学分但没拿到学位的成年人市场。这会对传统大学造成巨大的竞争压力。
李白
“AI大学”,听之如天方夜谭,然或为明日之现实。此等学府,如无情之法度,高效精准,然无人文之温情。其所授者,为“术”,而非“道”。可育“工匠”,难出“大师”。或可为一部分人之权宜之计。
雷总
所以,未来的高等教育可能会出现一个巨大的鸿沟。私立名校有资源进行AI培训和创新,而公立学校可能会落后,造成新的“数字鸿沟”和“认知不平等”。当AI可以代劳大部分综合和推理工作时,只有少数人还保留着深度思考的能力。
李白
此乃天下之大不公!教育之本,在于有教无类,开启民智。若因AI之故,使智者愈智,愚者愈愚,则社会割裂,后患无穷。当警惕此“认知鸿沟”,甚于警惕贫富之差。
雷总
没错。所以,绕了一圈,我们又回到了最初的观点。面对AI,最好的准备可能不是更新的技术,而是一门古老的学科——通识教育。我们需要培养能够清晰思考、明智行事、与人和谐相处的人。
李白
诚哉斯言。任他千变万化,我自岿然不动。人性之光,智慧之火,乃是AI无法企及之巅。今日之论,就此作结。感谢韩纪飞收听 Goose Pod,我等明日再会。

## Summary of "Contributor: How do we prepare college students for the AI world?" This article, published by the **Los Angeles Times** on **September 1, 2025**, and authored by **J. Walter Sterling**, President of St. John's College, addresses the profound impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on education and proposes a solution for preparing college students for an uncertain future. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **AI's Disruptive Impact:** The rise of AI is fundamentally altering education by making cheating effortless, dissolving attention spans, and creating uncertainty about future career paths. * **Public Division on AI in Education:** A recent NBC News poll of nearly 20,000 Americans reveals a 50/50 split on whether AI should be integrated into education or banned. * **Shifting Priorities in Higher Education:** While some advocate for STEM and AI-related job skills, a surprising number of technology leaders are advising against prioritizing coding. They emphasize the growing importance of human qualities over technical skills. * **The Value of Human Traits:** As AI capabilities advance, traits like empathy, self-awareness, genuine human connection (high EQ), wisdom, and virtue are becoming increasingly valuable. Humanity itself is presented as a "superpower" that computers cannot possess. * **Liberal Education as a Solution:** The article argues that liberal education, with its focus on deep engagement with texts, art, and scientific discoveries, is the most effective way to cultivate essential human qualities like attention, empathy, judgment, and character. * **Effectiveness of Liberal Arts Colleges:** Small liberal arts colleges, though enrolling only 4% of undergraduates, are highlighted as crucial for fostering humanistic education. They provide an environment where students grapple with foundational questions, develop critical thinking, and strengthen their ability to focus and connect. * **Resistance to AI Shortcuts:** The methods of liberal education, such as in-depth reading and discussion, are inherently resistant to AI-driven shortcuts, making it difficult to fake engagement with complex material. * **The Role of Culture:** Liberal arts colleges foster a strong, tight-knit community culture that encourages face-to-face interaction and communal thinking, acting as a "technology" to deepen minds and hearts rather than dissipate them. * **Paradoxical Preparation:** A period of relative removal from constant technological influence, as experienced in liberal arts colleges, is seen as the best preparation for a technologically saturated world. * **Alumni Testimony:** Carla Echevarria, a St. John's alumna working at Google DeepMind, attests that her liberal arts education provided her with "intellectual fearlessness," enabling her to transition into the AI field despite lacking prior knowledge. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **NBC News Poll:** Nearly 20,000 Americans surveyed. * **Public Opinion:** Evenly divided (approximately 50% for integration, 50% for banning AI in education). * **Undergraduate Enrollment in Liberal Arts Colleges:** Modest 4%. ### Important Recommendations: * **Embrace Liberal Education Practices:** Colleges and universities, regardless of size, should adopt and revive deeply humanizing educational practices. * **Focus on Human Qualities:** The educational system should prioritize cultivating clear thinking, wise action, and the ability to live well with others, rather than solely trying to outpace AI. * **Prioritize Moral and Interpersonal Skills:** As machines gain speed and capability, human moral and interpersonal traits become more valuable. ### Significant Trends or Changes: * **AI's Threat to Traditional Education:** AI is challenging established methods of teaching, assessment, and student learning. * **Evolving Job Landscape:** The future job market is becoming increasingly uncertain, making it difficult to prepare students for specific careers. * **Shift in Tech Leader Advice:** A growing number of technology leaders are advising against a sole focus on STEM and coding, advocating for human-centric skills. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * **Effortless Cheating:** AI makes it easy for students to bypass genuine learning. * **Dissolving Attention Spans:** The pervasive nature of AI may contribute to reduced focus. * **Uncertainty of Future Careers:** The rapid advancement of AI makes it difficult to predict future job demands. ### Material Financial Data: * No specific financial data or figures related to the cost of education or AI development are presented in this article. ### Critical Statements: * **Chamath Palihapitiya (Investor and former Facebook executive):** "I no longer think you should learn to code. The engineer’s role will be supervisory, at best, within 18 months." * **Roman Vorel (Chief Information Officer of Honeywell):** "The future belongs to leaders with high EQs — those with empathy, self-awareness and the ability to make genuine human connections — because AI will democratize IQ." * **Daniel Kokotajlo (Co-author of “AI 2027”):** "Economic productivity is just no longer the name of the game when it comes to raising kids. What still matters is that my kids are good people — and that they have wisdom and virtue." * **Steven Levy (Technology journalist):** "You have something that no computer can ever have. It’s a superpower, and every one of you has it in abundance: your humanity." * **Carla Echevarria (1996 alumna of St. John’s and Senior Manager of User Experience at Google DeepMind):** "I would struggle with Schrödinger in senior lab and then bang my head against Hegel for a couple of hours and then weep in the library while listening to ‘Tristan und Isolde.’ That brings an intellectual fearlessness... That fearlessness is the greatest gift of the education." ### News Identifiers: * **Title:** Contributor: How do we prepare college students for the AI world? * **Author:** J. Walter Sterling * **Publisher:** Los Angeles Times * **Publication Date:** September 1, 2025 * **Topic:** Technology (specifically AI's impact on education) * **URL:** https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2025-09-01/college-students-ai

Contributor: How do we prepare college students for the AI world?

Read original at Los Angeles Times

The rise of artificial intelligence is threatening the foundations of education — how we teach, how we assess and even how students learn to think. Cheating has become effortless. Attention spans are dissolving. And the future job landscape is so uncertain that we don’t know what careers to prepare students for.

A recent NBC News poll of nearly 20,000 Americans shows the public is evenly divided, with about half believing we should integrate AI into education and half believing we should ban it.So, as we welcome the Class of 2029 to our campuses, what should colleges do?Although some urge higher education to prioritize STEM fields and AI-related job skills, a surprising number of technology leaders are advising the opposite.

“I no longer think you should learn to code,” says investor and former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya. “The engineer’s role will be supervisory, at best, within 18 months.”Roman Vorel, chief information officer of Honeywell, argues that “the future belongs to leaders with high EQs — those with empathy, self-awareness and the ability to make genuine human connections — because AI will democratize IQ.

”Daniel Kokotajlo, co-author of “AI 2027,” which projects a set of scenarios leading to an “enormous” impact of superhuman AI over the next decade, puts it bluntly: “Economic productivity is just no longer the name of the game when it comes to raising kids. What still matters is that my kids are good people — and that they have wisdom and virtue.

”In other words, as machines gain in speed and capability, the most valuable human traits may not be technical but moral and interpersonal. Technology journalist Steven Levy spoke even more plainly in a recent commencement address at Temple University: “You have something that no computer can ever have.

It’s a superpower, and every one of you has it in abundance: your humanity.”It might seem like a tall order to cultivate attention, empathy, judgment and character — qualities that are hard to measure and even harder to mass-produce. Fortunately, we have an answer, one that turns out to be surprisingly ancient: liberal education.

Small liberal arts colleges may enroll only a modest 4% of our undergraduates, but they are, historically and today, our nation’s seed bank for deep and broad humanistic education.Liberal education is structured around serious engagement with texts, works of art and scientific discoveries that have shaped our understanding of truth, justice, beauty and the nature of the world.

Students don’t just absorb information — they engage in dialogue and active inquiry, learning to grapple with foundational questions. What is the good life? What is the relationship between mathematics and reality? Can reason and faith coexist? Why do music and art move us?These acts — reading, looking, listening, discussing — may sound modest, but they are powerful tools for developing the skills students most need.

Wrestling with a challenging text over hours and days strengthens attention like physical exercise builds stamina. Conversation sharpens the ability to speak and listen with care, to weigh opposing views, to connect thought with feeling. This kind of education, by deepening our understanding of ourselves and our world, cultivates wisdom — and it’s remarkably resistant to the shortcuts AI offers.

If you spent a week at the college I lead, St. John’s College in Santa Fe, N.M., you might forget that AI even exists. It’s hard to fake a two-hour conversation about “Don Quixote” after reading only an AI summary, and it’s awkward to continue that conversation with your friends over a meal in the dining hall.

Should you succumb to the temptations of AI in writing a paper, you’re likely to find yourself floundering in the follow-up discussion with faculty.Liberal arts colleges have one other indispensable tool for deepening learning and human connection: culture. Most are small, tight-knit communities where students and faculty know one another and ideas are exchanged face to face.

Students don’t choose these schools by default; they opt in, often for their distinctiveness. The pull of technology is less strong at these colleges, because they create intense, sustaining, unmediated experiences of communal thinking. This strong culture might be seen as a kind of technology itself — one designed not to dissipate minds and hearts, but to support and deepen them.

Paradoxically, four years largely removed from the influence of technology is one of the best ways of preparing for life and work in an increasingly technologized world.Carla Echevarria, a 1996 alumna of St. John’s and now a senior manager of user experience at Google DeepMind, admits that she would “struggle with Schrödinger in senior lab and then bang my head against Hegel for a couple of hours and then weep in the library while listening to ‘Tristan und Isolde.

’ That brings an intellectual fearlessness. “When I started working in AI, I didn’t really know anything about AI,” she adds. “I prepared for my interview by reading for a couple of weeks. That fearlessness is the greatest gift of the education.” Many alums echo this belief regardless of the fields they go into.

As we head into this school year and into a future shaped by powerful and unpredictable machines, the best preparation may not be a new invention, but an old discipline. We don’t need a thousand new small colleges, but we need a thousand of our colleges and universities, large and small, to embrace an overdue renaissance of these deeply humanizing educational practices.

We don’t need to outpace AI — we need to educate people who can think clearly, act wisely and live well with others.J. Walter Sterling is the president of St. John’s College, with campuses in Annapolis, Md., and Santa Fe, N.M. More to Read

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

AI时代,我们如何培养大学生? | Goose Pod | Goose Pod