AI-generated country track ‘Walk My Walk’ tops US Billboard chart

AI-generated country track ‘Walk My Walk’ tops US Billboard chart

2025-11-25Technology
--:--
--:--
卿姐
norris早上好,我是卿姐。今天是11月25日,星期二,欢迎收听专属于你的 Goose Pod。今天,我们将一起聊一个科技与艺术交融的话题。
李白
吾乃李白。今朝有何奇闻,竟能邀我共饮一杯?是金戈铁马,还是诗与远方?
卿姐
都不是,却也都有。一首名为《Walk My Walk》的乡村歌曲,最近登上了美国公告牌乡村数字歌曲销量榜的榜首。奇特的是,它的创作者并非人类,而是一个叫“Breaking Rust”的AI艺术家。
李白
哦?无名之辈,一曲惊天下?这“Breaking Rust”,意为“打破锈迹”,倒颇有几分破旧立新、横空出世的意味。不知此曲何等惊才绝艳,竟能拔得头筹?
卿姐
它确实引起了巨大的反响。在不到一个月的时间里,这首歌在Spotify上的播放量就超过了三百万次,相关的TikTok视频更是超过了十五万个。就像一阵风,吹遍了社交媒体的每个角落。
李白
三百万流响,十五万幻影!此非凡人手笔,乃是机关算尽。这究竟是神工鬼斧,还是邯郸学步,模仿他人之音韵,而失其本真?我对此颇为好奇。
卿姐
这确实是一个核心问题。而且,这并非孤例。在它之前,已有另一位AI艺术家Xania Monet登上公告牌,预示着一场变革的到来。有人说这是一场不可阻挡的进化,就如同春草破土,势不可挡。
李白
进化?哈!黄河之水天上来,奔流到海不复回。此等浪潮,果真无法逆转?我倒要看看,这无情之铁石,如何能谱写出人间至情之乐章!
卿姐
说到这里,就不得不提一些“前辈”了。比如之前也曾名声大噪的AI乐队“The Velvet Sundown”,它在短短一个月内就吸引了四十万的听众。但结局却出人意料,它的创作者承认,这只是一场为了戏弄媒体的恶作剧。
李白
跳梁小丑之计耳!借机关之巧,行哗众之实,虽能名噪一时,终究是镜花水月,一触即破。此等行径,不过是窃取了世人的好奇,非艺术之道也。
卿姐
说得对,真正的艺术需要真诚。但另一位AI艺术家Xania Monet的故事则更为复杂。她的创作者是一位诗人,将她视为一个真实的人来对待。这引发了另一个思考:我们究竟应该如何看待这些AI“艺术家”呢?
李白
是舟楫之功,还是善渡者之能?皮影傀儡,舞姿再妙,其魂魄终究在操纵之人手中。若其背后之心为真,或许,这机关造物也能传递几分真情。
卿姐
是的,工具本身是中立的。我想起一个截然不同领域的例子,科学家们利用AI设计出了能对抗超级细菌的新型抗生素。如果AI能成为治愈身体顽疾的良方,那么它是否也能成为创造抚慰心灵的艺术的画笔呢?
李白
善哉!此喻甚妙。良药可愈疾,妙音能解忧。器物本无心,善恶在乎人。若能以此为笔,描绘山川之壮丽,抒发人间之悲欢,未尝不是一件美事。
卿姐
正是如此。比如环球音乐集团,最近就与一家AI音乐公司达成了历史性的授权协议。这或许说明,业界正在从对抗转向合作,试图为AI这匹千里马,找到一条合适的驰骋之道。
李白
哦?资本总是逐利而行,看来他们已嗅到其中蕴藏的巨大机遇。与其筑墙阻挡,不如开渠引流。此举虽为商贾之谋,却也为这新生事物,寻了一条出路。
卿姐
然而,并非所有人都对这份“天外之音”报以掌声。很多音乐家表达了强烈的反对。歌手Kehlani就曾直言,地球上没有任何人或事能让她觉得AI是合理的,因为它在创作时,并未向那些被用于训练的原创作品致敬。
李白
风骨峭峻,不与俗同!此言深得我心。掠他人之诗,以为己作,此非君子所为!若这AI之音,乃是无数前辈心血的堆砌,却无一言鸣谢,实为盗者行径!
卿姐
这种心情完全可以理解。英国摇滚乐队Holding Absence就遇到了更直接的冲击。一个以他们的音乐为模型训练出来的AI乐队,仅仅用了两个月,流媒体数据就超过了他们。主唱说,这令人震惊、沮丧,更是一种警醒。
李白
长江后浪推前浪,浮世新人换旧人。然此浪非水生,乃机关所造,令人扼腕。十年磨一剑,不敌一朝之虚影,这对那些呕心沥血的音乐人来说,何其不公!
卿姐
的确,这种不公平感是冲突的核心。一方面是技术的飞速进步,另一方面是创作者权益的保护困境。ABBA乐队的成员认为AI是“一个很棒的工具”,但更多的艺术家,如Elton John,则担心它会威胁年轻艺术家的生计。
李白
是所谓“双刃剑”,利可断金,亦可伤身。如何执此利剑,斩妖除魔,而非误伤忠良,这考验着当代人的智慧。天平两端,一为创新,一为传承,谈何容易。
卿姐
这种影响已经渗透到了听众层面。法国一家流媒体的调查发现,高达百分之九十七的人,其实分不清AI音乐和真人音乐的区别。这让整个讨论变得更加复杂,当听众都无法分辨时,我们又该如何定义“真实”呢?
李白
哈哈,有趣!世人皆醉我独醒?非也,乃是真假难辨,鱼目混珠。当阳春白雪与下里巴人皆出自同一机杼,知音难觅,伯牙亦当摔琴。悲夫!
卿姐
更现实的影响是经济上的。有研究发出严峻警告,未来四年内,音乐行业从业者的收入可能会因为人工智能而减少四分之一。这不仅仅是艺术之争,更是关乎许多人饭碗的生存之战。
李白
四分之一!此非小数。若生计不保,何谈风花雪月?覆巢之下,安有完卵。看来,这场风波,远比想象中更为猛烈,已动摇了整个行业的根基。
卿姐
但正如我们之前提到的环球音乐与AI公司的合作,它也带来了新的可能性。比如为艺术家提供新的收入来源,甚至可能催生整合了创作与流媒体的全新商业平台。危机之中,也孕育着转机。
卿姐
为了应对这些挑战,一些平台已经开始行动。Spotify就确认,他们正在加强对AI的监管,移除了大量垃圾曲目和冒名顶替者,以保护创作者的权益。这是一个积极的信号。
李白
亡羊补牢,未为晚也。有法度方能成规矩,无规矩不成方圆。此举虽无法完全杜绝乱象,却也表明了态度,为后来者划定了不可逾越的红线。
卿姐
许多重量级的音乐家也在呼吁政府修改版权法,从更高层面来应对技术的快速发展。英国首相也回应说,关键在于“找到正确的平衡点”。这确实是未来的核心议题。
李白
道法自然,水利万物而不争。新术出世,当立规矩以限之,扬其利而避其害,方为长久之道。愿后人智慧,能为这匹千里马配上好鞍,而非任其脱缰。
卿姐
看来,AI音乐这把双刃剑,是机遇也是挑战。它的未来,终究取决于我们如何运用智慧去引导和规范。今天的讨论就到这里了,感谢norris收听Goose Pod。我们明天再见。
李白
愿你有美乐相伴,无论其出自人手,还是机关。Goose Pod,明日再会。

本期播客讨论了AI-generated country track ‘Walk My Walk’ tops US Billboard chart相关话题,为您带来深度分析和见解。

AI-generated country track ‘Walk My Walk’ tops US Billboard chart

Read original at NME

An AI-generated country track has hit the Number One spot on a US Billboard singles chart. ‘Walk My Walk’, released by AI artist Breaking Rust, is currently at the top of Billboard‘s Country Digital Songs sales chart, after gaining over three million streams on Spotify in less than a month. The track also tops Spotify’s ‘Viral 50’ chart in the US, while another of the “band’s” tracks, ‘Livin’ on Borrowed Time’, has reached Number Five in the same chart, with over four million streams on the platform.

The creator of Breaking Rust has yet to reveal their identity, but an official TikTok page for them has garnered close to 200,000 followers, with ‘Walk My Walk’ featuring in over 150,000 videos on the platform. News of AI-generated artists garnering huge streaming figures has become increasingly common.

Earlier this year, an AI-generated ‘band’ called The Velvet Sundown made headlines after gaining around 400,000 monthly Spotify listeners – despite only existing for less than a month. A ‘spokesperson’ for the viral act later admitted that he was running a hoax aimed at “the media”. As for how The Velvet Sundown got so many listeners on Spotify, he said: “I know we got on some playlists that just have like tons of followers, and it seems to have spiralled from there.

” Meanwhile, AI-generated artist Xania Monet has been in the headlines for signing a multimillion-dollar record deal and becoming the first AI artist to chart on the US Billboard rankings. Recommended The creator of Monet, Mississippi poet and designer Telisha “Nikki” Jones, has since spoken out in her first interview, saying she looks at Monet “as a real person”.

Jones also addressed the controversy surrounding Monet’s success, saying: “Any time something new comes about and it challenges the norm and challenges what we’re used to, you’re going to get strong reactions behind it” Kehlani has previously hit out at the success of Monet, telling fans on TikTok the proliferation of AI in music was “so beyond out of our control.

” She went on to highlight the power of AI to create fully formed songs without users having to “credit anyone” involved in making the copyrighted works on which such generative music systems are trained. “Nothing and no one on Earth will ever be able to justify AI to me,” she added. Other critics of the tech include Mac DeMarco and SZA, while ABBA‘s Björn Ulvaeus called AI “such a great tool”.

Elsewhere, back in September, Cardiff rock group Holding Absence hit out at an AI ‘band’ which had overtaken their streaming figures on Spotify. Frontman Lucas Woodland wrote on Twitter/X: “So, an AI ‘band’ who cite us as an influence (ie, it’s modelled off our music) have just overtaken us on Spotify, in only TWO months.

” The vocalist continued: “It’s shocking, it’s disheartening, it’s insulting – most importantly – it’s a wake up call.” Meanwhile, audiences are reportedly finding it difficult to distinguish between “real” and AI music, with a new report from French streaming service Deezer finding that 97 per cent of people “can’t tell the difference” between the two.

The “first-of-its-kind” survey also found that only 19 per cent said they felt that they could trust AI, while another 51 per cent said they believe the use of AI in music production could lead to low-quality and “generic” sounding music. The new stats come during a period of continued controversy for AI technology in the music industry, with a recent study sharing the stark warning that people working in music are likely to lose a quarter of their income to Artificial Intelligence over the next four years.

In September, Spotify confirmed that it was cracking down on AI by removing 75million “spammy tracks” and targeting impersonators. The statement, titled ‘Spotify Strengthens AI Protections For Artists, Songwriters, And Producers’, added: “AI technology is evolving fast, and we’ll continue to roll out new policies frequently.

” This followed a report claiming that AI-generated songs were being uploaded to dead musicians’ Spotify profiles without permission. Paul McCartney, Kate Bush and Elton John are among the big British artists to have urged Keir Starmer to protect the work of creatives back in September. This came after the Prime Minister told NME: “It’s very important we protect creativity, and we’re brilliant at creativity in this country – we punch well above our weight within the country and globally, and we’re all very proud of that.

“We need to get the balance right. That’s why we did a long and important consultation, and we’re going through the responses of that consultation now. So it is a question of getting the balance right.” His comments followed a call on the UK government from various major acts to change copyright laws to combat the tech as it progresses rapidly.

Elton John claimed in January that AI would “dilute and threaten young artists’ earnings”, while backing criticism from Paul McCartney.

Related Podcasts

AI-generated country track ‘Walk My Walk’ tops US Billboard chart | Goose Pod | Goose Pod