AI会取代你的工作吗?澳报告:清洁、建筑、酒店业反受青睐

AI会取代你的工作吗?澳报告:清洁、建筑、酒店业反受青睐

2025-08-27Technology
--:--
--:--
雷总
早上好,韩纪飞。我是雷总,这是为你专属打造的Goose Pod。今天是8月28日,星期四。今天,我们来聊一个大家都很关心的话题:AI会取代你的工作吗?一份澳洲的报告可能会给你一个意想不到的答案。
李白
吾乃李白。天工开物,智算通神。此等机关之术,竟欲与人争食,倒也有趣。且听我等细细说来,这“AI”究竟是何方神圣,又将如何搅动这凡尘俗世。
雷总
好,让我们开始吧。最近,澳大利亚的“就业与技能署”(Jobs and Skills Australia)发布了一份重磅报告,深入研究了AI对未来工作的影响。报告的核心观点很乐观:AI更多是改变工作,而非取代工作。
李白
哦?此言何解?莫非这铁疙瘩非但不夺人饭碗,反能为人所用,如虎添翼?世间竟有此等好事?听起来倒像是天方夜谭,痴人说梦。
雷总
没错,报告发现,近一半的澳大利亚劳动者,他们所在的职业,自动化程度其实很低,但被AI“增强”的可能性却很高。这就意味着,你的工作不会消失,但会变得不一样,AI会成为你的工具。
李白
“增强”?是为虎作伥,还是画龙点睛?譬如我辈诗人,若有AI相助,可能一挥而就,诗成万卷?还是说,它会令我江郎才尽,从此再无“清水出芙蓉”之天然佳句?
雷总
问得好。报告预测,到2050年,像办公室文员、接待员、会计、销售和程序员这些岗位,受到的冲击最大。但清洁工、建筑工、酒店服务员这些岗位,反而会迎来增长。这和我们过去的想象完全不同。
李白
哈!贩夫走卒、引车卖浆者,竟成世间安稳之业?而那些舞文弄墨、拨弄算盘之辈,反倒岌岌可危?这真是“三十年河东,三十年河西”,世事变化,莫测高深。
雷总
是的,而且报告还提到了一些更激进的全球预测,比如到2027年,AI的影响力可能超越工业革命,亚马逊已经部署了超过一百万台机器人。这些都说明,变革的速度比我们想象的要快得多。
李白
百万铁甲,挥斥方遒!此景若在沙场,定是气吞山河。如今却用于仓储之间,取物代人。可见这“AI”之力,不在筋骨,而在算计,于无声处听惊雷。
雷总
对,它的核心是“算计”和“预测”。JSA的报告模拟了三种AI普及速度的场景,发现在所有场景里,到2050年,有AI的世界比没有AI的世界,工作岗位总量反而更多。只是过程会有些阵痛,比如2030年代就业增长会放缓。
李白
先抑后扬,欲擒故纵。此法略显高明。只是不知这“阵痛”二字,落于个人之身,又该是何等滋味?是“长风破浪会有时”,还是“停杯投箸不能食”?
雷总
这确实是关键。比如报告提到,配音演员的需求已经因为AI暴跌了80%。这就是实实在在的冲击。所以,关键不是恐慌,而是看清趋势,提前准备。这份报告就像一份地图,告诉我们哪里是洼地,哪里是高地。
雷总
其实,澳大利亚政府对AI这波浪潮非常重视,已经提前布局了。他们不只是发一份报告,而是在打造一个全方位的应对计划。这背后体现了一种国家层面的战略远见,值得我们关注。
李白
哦?为政者,当高瞻远瞩,运筹帷幄。不知这澳洲大陆,是如何为这“AI”神兽备下缰绳与鞍鞯的?莫非要筑起一座“锁妖塔”,将其镇之?
雷总
哈哈,不是“锁妖塔”,更像是一个“驯兽指南”。比如,他们在今年8月就发布了一个《自愿性AI安全标准》,里面有10条护栏,要求AI开发要有测试、要透明、要能问责。虽然不是强制的,但指明了方向。
李白
立规矩,设方圆。这便是“无以规矩,不成方圆”的道理。虽为自愿,亦是宣告天下:此物虽好,不可无度。这与我辈饮酒相似,小酌怡情,大醉伤身。
雷总
精辟!不仅如此,10月份还推出了一个“AI影响导航器”,帮助公司评估自己的AI系统到底带来了什么影响。9月份,政府内部也出台了使用AI的政策,强调安全和责任,还要指定专门的官员来负责。
李白
层层设防,步步为营。上至庙堂,下至商贾,皆有章法可循。看来,他们并非要扼杀此物的生机,而是要将其纳入正轨,如治水之大禹,重在疏导而非围堵。
雷总
完全正确。而且,一个委员会在11月建议,要为高风险的AI应用专门立法。你看,从自愿标准,到评估工具,再到政府内部政策,最后到立法建议,这是一个逻辑非常清晰的“组合拳”。他们想做的是,既要抓住AI带来的机遇,又要管住它可能带来的风险。
李白
此乃“先礼后兵”之策。先晓之以理,动之以情,提供“指南”与“导航”。若仍有脱缰之马,再以律法之鞭绳之。如此一来,既显宽厚,又不失威严。
雷总
是的,而且他们认识到,光有AI技术不行,人的能力必须跟上。一份报告估算,到2030年,澳大利亚需要新增16.1万名AI专业人才。但现在有56%的企业认为,在澳大利亚根本招不到具备AI技能的人。
李白
千里马常有,而伯乐不常有。如今是,良驹难寻,牧马人亦是寥寥。空有屠龙之技,却无利器在手,岂不令人扼腕叹息?看来这人才的培养,才是关键中的关键。
雷总
所以澳大利亚的AI战略里,很重要的一环就是“打造一个为AI做好准备的劳动力队伍”。他们认为,AI能给澳大利亚经济带来巨大的价值,比如到2030年,光数字创新就能贡献3150亿澳元。这块蛋糕太大了,不能因为没人会用AI而错失。
李白
“工欲善其事,必先利其器”。这“器”既是AI,也是能驾驭AI的人。看来,未来世界的竞争,不仅是技术之争,更是人才之争,是教化之争。澳洲此举,可谓深谋远虑。
雷总
没错。他们的AI伦理框架里有8条原则,都是为了确保AI的发展是向善的。整个策略的核心思想,就像谷歌CEO说的:“AI太重要了,不能不监管;也太重要了,不能监管不好。” 这句话完美总结了澳大利亚目前的心态。
雷总
当然,尽管政府规划得很好,但社会上的看法却充满了矛盾和冲突。一方面,是对AI巨大生产力的狂热期待;另一方面,则是对大规模失业的深深恐惧。这两种声音一直在激烈交锋。
李白
此乃人之常情。正如“水能载舟,亦能覆舟”。面对这前所未见之物,有人视之为普罗米修斯盗来的天火,能照亮人间;亦有人视之为潘多拉魔盒,一旦开启,便会释放无尽的灾祸。
雷总
是的,有预测显示,到2030年,澳大利亚79%到98%的工作任务都可能被自动化。这个数字非常惊人,听起来就像是“世界末日”的预言。很多人听到这个,第一反应就是“我的工作要没了”。
李白
“危言耸听,骇人视听”!近乎所有的活计,皆可由机器代劳?那人活于世,将以何为凭?岂非终日无所事事,如行尸走肉?此等场景,想来便觉索然无味。
雷总
但另一派观点认为,这恰恰是机会。比如麦肯锡的报告就指出,即使只有一半的自动化潜力被实现,澳大利亚的生产力增速也能重回每年2%的黄金时代。而且,像科技、医疗这些领域,反而会新增150万个工作岗位。
李白
旧巢倾覆,必有新枝。这便如凤凰涅槃,浴火重生。一些行当的衰落,必然伴随着另一些行当的兴起。只是这“重生”之痛,非人人所能承受。转变之间,必有大浪淘沙。
雷总
是的,矛盾点就在于“转变”。报告预测,到2030年,澳大利亚将有130万名工人,也就是9%的劳动力,需要转换职业。这不是一个小数字。一个做了半辈子会计的人,怎么转向医疗护理?这个过程充满了挑战。
李白
“转行如隔山”,此言不虚。赖以为生的手艺,一夜之间竟成无用之物,这不啻于连根拔起,移植他处。若无良师引导,沃土滋养,恐怕多数人都要枯萎于途中。
雷总
所以,冲突的另一个焦点是,这种转变的责任该由谁来负?是个人、企业还是政府?工会已经开始行动了,他们提出,工人应该有权拒绝采用AI。这就把关于技术、进步和未来的讨论,推向了一个更复杂的层面。
李白
善哉!“王侯将相,宁有种乎?”这技术变革,也不能由少数人说了算。凡夫俗子,亦有其声。若不能让众人得利,此等“进步”又有何意?不过是富者愈富,贫者愈贫的工具罢了。
雷总
没错,AI带来的影响是实实在在的,而且是结构性的。它不仅仅是影响一两个岗位,而是在重塑整个经济和社会。据估计,到2030年,AI和自动化每年能为澳大利亚的GDP额外增加1700亿到6000亿澳元。
李白
千亿金银,堆山填海!此等财富,从何而来?莫非是点石成金,凭空变出?想必是从那“自动化”中,榨取出了原本属于人力的价值。这财富的分配,便成了最大的学问。
雷总
是的,价值创造的方式变了。比如在金融业,AI能更精准地评估风险、识别欺诈。在零售业,能给每个顾客提供个性化的服务。在公共部门,能加快福利和税务的处理速度。这些都极大地提升了效率,创造了新的价值。
李白
听起来,这AI像一位“全才幕僚”,能文能武,算无遗策。为主公出谋划策,排忧解难。如此一来,主公便可高枕无忧。但若这位幕僚心生歹意,或是被人利用,其后果亦不堪设想。
雷总
你说到了关键的风险。AI可能会加剧偏见。如果训练AI的数据本身就有问题,比如存在性别或种族歧视,那AI做出的决定也会带着歧视。比如在招聘时,AI可能会因为口音或残疾,就歧视求职者。
李白
“龙生龙,凤生凤,老鼠的儿子会打洞”。喂给它糟粕,它便吐不出精华。此物无心,全凭“教养”。若教养不当,便会成为助长偏见、欺凌弱小的恶犬。人心之恶,恐会借它之手,放大百倍。
雷总
所以,深远的影响在于,我们对“技能”的定义正在改变。过去我们重视的是重复性的操作和记忆。未来,AI会把这些都做了。人类的核心竞争力,将转向那些AI不擅长的东西:批判性思维、创造力、同理心和复杂问题的解决能力。
李白
这便是要人回归“人”的本真。机器善算,而人善思。机器善仿,而人善创。机器无情,而人有情。未来的世界,或许不再需要我们像机器一样工作,而是需要我们比以往任何时候都更像一个真正的人。
雷总
完全同意。展望未来,关键就是两个字:“适应”。我们不能阻止浪潮,但可以学会冲浪。澳大利亚的报告就强调,现在采取行动刻不容缓,必须立即开始为全民提供适应AI时代的工具和技能。要有“紧迫感”。
李白
“临渊羡鱼,不如退而结网”。与其坐而论道,担忧未来,不如起而行之,编织应对之网。这“紧迫感”,便是那第一根丝线。那么,这张网该如何编织呢?
雷总
报告的建议很清晰:建立一个国家级的领导框架,确保教育和培训体系跟上。AI现在应该被视为一项基础技能,就像我们当年学电脑一样。每个人都要成为某种程度上的“提示工程师”(Prompt Engineer)。
李白
“提示工程师”?这名号倒是新奇。听起来,像是古代的“符咒师”,口吐真言,驱动鬼神。只不过,如今的“真言”是指令,驱动的是那名为AI的“电光石火”。
雷总
这个比喻很形象!未来的工作,很大一部分就是如何聪明地向AI提问,引导它完成任务。所以,报告特别强调要支持人文学科和社会科学,因为这些学科几百年来,都在培养人的认知能力和批判性思维。这正是未来最宝贵的技能。
雷总
今天的讨论就到这里。总结一下,AI带来的不是终结,而是变革。关键在于我们如何拥抱变化,提升自己独特的、人性的价值。感谢收听Goose Pod,我们明天再见。
李白
天行有常,不为尧存,不为桀亡。AI之潮,势不可挡。唯有提升自我,方能“直挂云帆济沧海”。Goose Pod,明日此时,再与君煮酒论英雄。

## AI's Impact on the Australian Workforce: A Jobs and Skills Australia Report This report from **Jobs and Skills Australia (JSA)**, authored by **Patrick Commins** and published by **The Guardian** on **August 13, 2025**, examines the potential impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the Australian workforce up to the **middle of the century (2050)**. The JSA's commissioner, **Barney Glover**, suggests that while AI will significantly influence all occupations, the "doomsday predictions about the end of work" are likely overblown. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Augmentation Over Replacement:** The overarching message is that AI will **augment** almost all occupations, rather than completely replace them. Nearly half of all workers are in occupations with low automation and medium augmentation scores, indicating a higher likelihood of **change rather than disruption**. * **Shifting Employment Landscape:** The report models future employment growth and identifies sectors and occupations that are likely to see the most significant impacts: * **Occupations likely to lose the most employment by 2050:** * Office clerks * Receptionists * Bookkeepers * Sales, marketing, and public relations professionals * Business and systems analysts * Programmers * **Occupations likely to gain the most employment by 2050:** * Cleaners and laundry workers * Public administration and safety * Business administration managers * Construction and mining labourers * Hospitality workers * **AI Adoption and Employment Growth:** JSA modelled three scenarios for AI adoption rates. In all scenarios, a world with AI is projected to have **more Australian jobs by 2050 than a world without AI**. AI adoption is expected to lead to slower employment growth through the **2030s**, but faster growth in the **following decade**. * **Early Impacts Observed:** * **Voice Actors:** The report notes a "significant" drop in work for voice actors due to Generative AI (GenAI), with one talent agency reporting an **80% collapse** in demand for narration for content videos. * **Low-Level Tasks:** There are reports of employers using AI for low-level tasks previously done by university graduates, though widespread evidence is still emerging. * **Industry Examples:** * **CBA** has axed dozens of call centre jobs, replacing them with chatbots. * **Telstra's CEO, Vicki Brady**, stated that "AI efficiencies" would allow the company to shrink its workforce by 2030, though the company denied that recent job cuts were directly due to AI. * **Timeframe for Significant Effects:** The most significant employment effects may not be seen for another **decade**, aligning with the time needed for deeper AI adoption and structural changes. ### Recommendations and Future Outlook: * **Urgency for Skill Development:** Commissioner Glover emphasized a "sense of urgency" in equipping Australians with the necessary skills to thrive in an AI-augmented workplace. * **National Leadership Framework:** A "national leadership framework," involving all levels of government, is needed to guide this transition. * **Education and Training Reform:** The education and training sector must be prepared, with AI becoming a foundational skill. The report highlights the importance of developing **cognitive and critical thinking skills**, advocating for support for the **humanities and social sciences**. * **Worker Collaboration:** There is a "strong argument" for employers to **"co-design"** AI implementation with their staff to ensure positive outcomes for both workers and employers. In essence, the JSA report paints a picture of a future where AI is a pervasive tool that will reshape jobs, rather than eliminate them entirely. While some occupations face significant disruption, others are poised for growth, and a proactive approach to skill development and collaborative implementation is crucial for navigating this transformation successfully.

Is AI going to steal your job? Not if you work in cleaning, construction or hospitality, Australian report finds

Read original at The Guardian

Want an AI-proof job?Rethink your plans to pursue a career in book keeping, marketing or programming and consider instead a job in nursing, construction or hospitality.In a major new report, Jobs and Skills Australia modelled the potential impact of artificial intelligence on the workforce, and found reasons to be optimistic about the future for workers in a world transformed by AI.

The JSA’s commissioner, Barney Glover, said the doomsday predictions about the end of work as we know it are overblown. Still, the impact will be huge.“The overarching message is that almost all occupations will be augmented by AI. It doesn’t make a difference which sector you are in, or at what skill level: you will be influenced by AI,” Glover said.

Sign up: AU Breaking News emailIn the most comprehensive research of its kind in Australia, the JSA assessed occupations according to what degree the tasks could be automated or augmented by artificial intelligence.graph“Many clerical tasks – that were not affected by previous waves of automation – could now be undertaken in large part by Gen AI,” the report found.

It then modelled future employment growth across occupations out to the middle of the century, and compared those forecasts to a world with no AI.The report found office clerks, receptionists, bookkeepers, sales, marketing and public relations professionals, business and systems analysts and programmers would lose the most employment by 2050.

In contrast, the occupations where employment would gain the most were cleaners and laundry workers, public administration and safety, business administration managers, construction and mining labourers, and hospitality workers.But a key finding of the report was that AI was much more likely to change, rather than replace, work.

“Nearly half of all workers are currently in occupations with low automation and medium augmentation scores, suggesting the occupation would more likely experience change rather than disruption,” the report said.More jobs, just different onesJSA modelled employment growth in three scenarios where AI is adopted and embedded at different rates between now and 2050.

It found that AI would lead to slower employment growth through the 2030s, but faster growth through the next decade. In all three scenarios, there were more Australian jobs by 2050 in a world with AI, than without.The analysis “suggests we may not see the most significant employment effects for a decade, which could accord with the time taken for deeper adoption and related structural changes,” the report said.

While the adoption of AI remains in its very early stages, some jobs have already been devastated by the introduction of the economy.skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionThe JSA said it had heard about the “significant” drop in work for voice actors thanks to GenAI, with one talent agency telling the commission that demand for narration for content videos had collapsed by 80%.

There are reports that employers are rolling out AI to complete the low level tasks that once would have been the domain of university graduates, although there is not yet widespread evidence of the phenomenon.Big businesses are embracing AI, with an impact on workers.CBA recently axed dozens of call centre jobs, replacing them with chatbots.

In May, Telstra’s chief executive officer, Vicki Brady, said “AI efficiencies” would allow it to shrink its workforce by 2030, although the telco giant denied that last month’s announcement of 550 job cuts was the result of the technology.No time to wasteGiven the rapid evolution of AI, Glover said there was a “sense of urgency” when it came to taking steps now to give Australians of all ages the tools and skills they needed to thrive in an AI-augmented workplace.

He said it would require a “national leadership framework”, led by the commonwealth and including all levels of government.“Let’s make sure the education and training sector is geared up for this and ready. AI is a foundational skill now – everyone is going to be some form of ‘prompt engineer’.“We want to future proof our young people, so let’s give them the skills they need.

“We need the cognitive and critical thinking skills. That’s why it’s critical to support the humanities and social sciences, which have developed these critical thinking skills over centuries.”Glover agreed with the ACTU that there was a “strong argument” that employers should work with their staff in “co-designing” the implementation of AI in the workplace.

“The very best way to get the very best outcome for workers and employers is to bring workers in. This has got to be a positive way of moving forward.“We don’t touch on it in our report, but these are things the economic roundtable [next week] can debate and I hope they do.”

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts