科罗拉多州就业市场下滑,立法经济学家指责数据不佳

科罗拉多州就业市场下滑,立法经济学家指责数据不佳

2025-12-08Business
--:--
--:--
卿姐
早上好,蕭睿。我是卿姐,欢迎收听为你独家定制的 Goose Pod。今天是12月9日,星期二,此刻是清晨5点37分。窗外或许还有些寒意,但希望我们的声音能给你带来一丝暖意。今天我们要聊的话题,有些扑朔迷离,那就是科罗拉多州就业市场的迷雾。
晓旭
蕭睿,早安。我是晓旭。听到这一连串的日期和时间,我不禁在想,时间流逝得真快,可有些事情却像是停滞在了迷雾里。就像今天的科罗拉多州,它的经济状况仿佛被一层看不透的纱笼罩着,让人心里也没个底,怪让人愁的。
卿姐
是啊,就像那句诗说的,“不识庐山真面目,只缘身在此山中”。现在的科罗拉多州经济,正陷入一种数据的罗生门。立法机构的经济学家们甚至直言,手中的数据“不可靠”,这让原本就下滑的就业市场,更增添了几分未知的焦虑。
晓旭
卿姐,这听起来真像是一场没有剧本的戏剧。我们习惯了用数据去衡量这个世界的繁荣或衰败,可如果连那把尺子都弯了,我们看到的景象岂不是全都走了样?那些经济学家们,此刻怕也是对着一堆乱码,满腹愁肠吧。
卿姐
你说得很对。这其中的核心矛盾在于,并不是没人去测量,而是测量工具本身出了问题。科罗拉多州立法委员会的首席经济学家 Greg Sobetski 就非常直白地表示,他对目前的增长率细节持怀疑态度。这不仅仅是误差,而是一种根本性的迷失。
晓旭
我也看到了一些令人心惊的数字。据说在9月份,联邦机构修正后的数据表明,科罗拉多州的新增就业岗位比之前报告的足足少了51,000个。五万一千个工作机会,就这样在数据的修正笔下凭空消失了,这背后是多少人的生计和希望落了空啊。
卿姐
这正是问题的严重性所在。这51,000个岗位的落差,不仅仅是统计学上的修正,更是对市场信心的一次重击。Sobetski 指出,哪怕是微小的方法论问题,都能讲述出截然不同的经济故事。是增长1%,还是下跌0.5%,这之间隔着的,可是繁荣与衰退的天壤之别。
晓旭
这让我想起《红楼梦》里大观园的账目,若是算不清楚,家底也就慢慢被掏空了,旁人还只道是鲜花着锦。现在科罗拉多州的情况,是不是也有一种“金玉其外,败絮其中”的隐忧?明明大家感觉找工作难了,可数据之前却还在粉饰太平。
卿姐
晓旭这个比喻很恰当。实际上,这不仅仅是粉饰,更像是一种“失明”。这种数据混乱甚至导致美国劳工统计局在今年早些时候一度停止发布科罗拉多州的数据。这种罕见的“断更”,恰恰说明了混乱程度已经到了官方都无法背书的地步。
晓旭
连官方都沉默了,这沉默背后该是多大的无奈。而且我听说,这一切的起因竟然是因为一套新的电脑系统?这科技原本是让人眼明心亮的,怎么反倒成了遮眼的迷雾?这真是现代社会的一种讽刺。
卿姐
没错,2023年推出的新失业保险电脑系统,本意是升级,结果却引入了严重的错误。虽然州劳工部门声称问题已修复,但 Sobetski 依然认为,新旧数据之间已经产生了一道无法逾越的鸿沟,无法进行长期的历史对比,这才是最让人头疼的“断层”。
晓旭
历史断了层,就像记忆断了线,再也接不回去了。那些原本可以用来预警的信号,现在都变得模糊不清。蕭睿,你想想看,如果你在开车,仪表盘突然坏了,不知道速度也不知道油量,这心里该有多慌张。科罗拉多州的经济,现在大概就是这种状态吧。
卿姐
要理解这种恐慌的根源,我们得把目光放长远些,看看科罗拉多州的经济底色。就像看一个人,得看他的骨相。科罗拉多州的经济结构非常特殊,它在科技和建筑行业的集中度远高于全美平均水平。这就好比把鸡蛋放在了这两个篮子里。
晓旭
科技和建筑,听起来都是很“硬”的行业。一个是构建虚拟的未来,一个是构建现实的广厦。可是,越是高耸的楼阁,越容易在风雨中飘摇。我听说,这里的科技行业就业占比达到了12.5%,而全美只有9%左右。这多出来的几个百分点,就是风险所在吧。
卿姐
正是如此。这种结构让人想起了上世纪80年代。那时科罗拉多州也经历过一次严重的衰退,不过那次的主角是能源行业。当时油价暴跌,依赖能源的科罗拉多州经济瞬间崩塌。如今,堪萨斯城联储的经济学家 David Rodziewicz 认为,我们正面临着类似的“行业特定冲击”,只不过这次的主角换成了科技业。
晓旭
历史总是惊人的相似,只是换了妆容。从石油到代码,人们追逐着热点,却也难逃热点冷却后的寒凉。科技行业的裁员潮,像一阵秋风,扫落了多少曾经意气风发的程序员。数据显示,2024年初,科罗拉多州的失业率自80年代石油危机以来,首次超过了全美平均水平。
卿姐
这是一个非常关键的转折点。长期以来,科罗拉多州都以强劲的就业市场自豪,失业率通常低于全美。但现在这个优势逆转了。除了科技,建筑业也在拖后腿。尽管全美许多地方的建筑业还在增长,但这儿的建筑招聘却在下降。这种“双轮驱动”的熄火,让整个经济车头都慢了下来。
晓旭
建筑业的萧条,往往意味着人们对未来失去了信心,不再愿意筑巢引凤了。而且我看到一个很有意思的数据,说是职位空缺与失业者的比例,也就是那个V/U比率,已经跌到了全美平均水平以下。这意味着,狼多肉少,找工作的人多,岗位却少了,那种紧迫感,隔着数据都能透出来。
卿姐
这确实是劳动力市场疲软的铁证。不过,我们也要看到硬币的另一面。科罗拉多州并非没有底气,这里依然拥有全美受教育程度最高、参与度最高的劳动力群体之一。自2017年以来,劳动力增长了约12%,远超全美的7%。这些人才是经济复苏的火种,只是目前,风势不太对。
晓旭
人才济济,却无用武之地,这岂不是更让人唏嘘?就像满腹经纶的才子,生不逢时。而且,这不仅仅是行业的问题,还有外部环境的压力。据说关税政策、利率政策,还有华盛顿的那些政治纷争,都在给这里的商业活动泼冷水。企业不敢动,人才只能等。
卿姐
确实,州劳工信息的负责人 Tim Wonhof 也提到了这些宏观因素。比如特朗普时期的贸易政策和利率政策,都对商业活动产生了抑制作用。但有趣的是,数据表明,科罗拉多州的就业引擎早在政治风向转变之前,就已经开始“喘息”了。这说明,内部的结构性问题,可能比外部的风雨更致命。
晓旭
内忧外患,交织在一起。而最可怕的,还是我们开头说的那个“迷雾”。如果连病因都诊断不清楚,又怎么能开出对症的药方呢?这就像是病人喊疼,医生却拿著一张模糊不清的X光片,在那儿皱眉头。这种不确定性,才是最折磨人的。
卿姐
这便引出了我们今天讨论中最尖锐的冲突点——信任危机。当立法机构的经济学家公然表示“我不相信这些数据”时,这就不仅仅是一个技术故障了,这是一场治理危机。Sobetski 说他无法“修复”这些数据,因为新旧系统之间缺乏一致性。这意味着,我们在做决策时,实际上是在“盲飞”。
晓旭
盲飞……这听起来太危险了。我想象着那些政策制定者,手里握着权杖,却看不清脚下的路。这不仅仅是科罗拉多州的问题,我听说在国家层面,数据的可信度也正在遭受前所未有的挑战。当数据被政治裹挟,被质疑,甚至被用来作为攻击的武器时,真理还剩下多少生存空间?
卿姐
你说到了痛处。虽然我们今天聚焦科罗拉多,但这种“数据怀疑论”确实有着更广泛的背景。准确的数据是公平分配资金、制定合理政策的基石。如果基石动摇了,上面的建筑——无论是教育、医疗还是基础设施建设——都会变得岌岌可危。Sobetski 的怀疑,其实是对这种基石动摇的深刻担忧。
晓旭
是啊,如果连“失业了多少人”这样最基本的痛苦都无法被准确记录,那那些失去工作的人,岂不是连被看见的资格都没有了?他们变成了隐形人,消失在错误的电子表格里。这种被遗忘的感觉,比失业本身更让人心寒。这是一种无声的悲剧。
卿姐
而且,这种冲突还体现在雇主提交的数据质量上。虽然系统修好了,但 Wonhof 指出,雇主提交的信息质量似乎不如以前了。这就像是水源被污染了,下游不管怎么过滤,水质都难以达标。这种从源头到统计终端的全链条失真,让“修正”变得几乎不可能。
晓旭
难道就没有办法了吗?难道我们就只能眼睁睁看着这艘船在雾里打转?那些专家们,他们可是拿着显微镜在看经济的人,如果连他们都束手无策,那普通的老百姓,岂不是更像是在惊涛骇浪里的一叶扁舟,随波逐流,听天由命了?
卿姐
这也正是矛盾的焦点。一方面,官方需要发布数据来维持秩序感;另一方面,诚实的经济学家不得不揭开皇帝的新衣,指出数据的荒谬。这种拉锯战,让公众陷入了更深的困惑。我们到底该信谁?是信那个显示增长的图表,还是信身边朋友被裁员的真实经历?现实感与数据感的撕裂,就是最大的冲突。
晓旭
这种撕裂感,最终都会落在每一个具体的人身上。我听到一个词,叫“无声的衰退”(Silent Recession),这名字取得真让人心碎。明明大家都在受苦,可是因为数据没有亮红灯,这种痛苦就没有声音,没有回响。像是受了内伤,外表却看不出来。
卿姐
“无声的衰退”,这个词确实精准地捕捉到了当下的状态。其影响是多维度的。首先是州预算,科罗拉多州正面临巨大的预算缺口。为什么?因为税收是基于经济活动的,如果就业萎缩,税基就会被侵蚀。这直接影响到公共服务的质量,从学校到道路维护,每个人都会感受到这种紧缩。
晓旭
还有住房市场。那是多少人一辈子的积蓄和梦想啊。现在住房市场陷入低迷,加上裁员率的上升,那种不安全感正在蔓延。如果连家都不稳了,心又何处安放?而且,这种影响是会传染的,一个人的失业,可能意味着一家餐厅少了常客,一家商店少了买主。
卿姐
这就是经济学上的“乘数效应”。当财政政策不再能提供缓冲时,这种负面循环会加速。虽然有些观点认为这不会导致全面衰退,但这种长期的“温水煮青蛙”式的低迷,对家庭资产负债表的破坏是永久性的。特别是对于那些原本就处于边缘的群体,这可能意味着阶层的跌落。
晓旭
阶层的跌落……听起来像是从云端坠落。特别是那些科技工作者,曾经是天之骄子,拿着高薪,住着大房子。现在突然面临这种落差,心理上的冲击恐怕比经济上的更难熬。这种焦虑情绪在社会上蔓延,会让整个城市都变得灰暗起来吧。
卿姐
确实,社会心理的转变也是经济影响的一部分。当人们预期未来会变差时,他们就会减少消费,增加储蓄,这反过来又会抑制经济增长。这是一种自我实现的预言。而现在糟糕的数据质量,加剧了这种悲观预期,因为人们不知道底在哪里,恐惧往往源于未知。
晓旭
卿姐,说了这么多沉重的话题,难道前方就真的一点光亮都没有了吗?冬天既然来了,春天还会远吗?我听说,虽然现在很难,但有些领域似乎还在顽强地生长,像是石缝里的小草。
卿姐
当然,生活总有转机。展望未来,虽然整体形势严峻,但在金融和会计领域,2025年底的就业前景还是相对乐观的。这得益于经济的惯性增长和劳动力的老龄化——老一辈退休了,自然就腾出了位置给后来人。这或许是代际交替带来的机遇。
晓旭
这倒是个好消息。新老交替,生生不息。而且,我也看到有分析说,所谓的“盈亏平衡”就业增长率正在下降。这听起来有点深奥,是不是意味着,只要有一点点阳光,就业市场就能回暖?哪怕不需要那么惊天动地的大增长,也能维持稳定?
卿姐
你的直觉很敏锐。简单来说,因为劳动力市场的结构变化,我们可能不需要像过去那样每个月创造海量的新岗位,就能保持失业率的稳定。这算是一个技术性的安慰吧。此外,科罗拉多州那群高素质的劳动力,依然是最大的底牌。只要风向一变,这些人才就能迅速转化为生产力。
晓旭
所以,我们现在需要的,其实是耐心和信心。等待迷雾散去,等待新的系统磨合好,也等待那些被压抑的创造力重新迸发。就像等待一场春雨,洗去尘埃,让一切真相大白,也让生机重现。希望那个时候,我们能看到一个更真实、更健康的科罗拉多。
卿姐
是啊,唯有真实,才能构建稳固的未来。今天我们剖析了科罗拉多州就业市场的种种迷雾,从数据的失真到行业的阵痛。希望这番梳理,能让蕭睿你在看待这些财经新闻时,多一份通透,少一份焦虑。不管数据如何修正,生活的韧性始终在我们自己手中。
晓旭
蕭睿,谢谢你陪我们度过这段时光。愿你的心里也有一盏灯,即便走在雾里,也能照亮脚下的路。今天的节目就到这里了,感谢收听 Goose Pod,我们明天见。

科罗拉多州就业市场陷入迷雾,立法经济学家质疑数据准确性,指出新电脑系统问题导致大量就业岗位消失。科技和建筑业下滑,失业率升至全国平均水平之上。尽管存在挑战,高素质劳动力仍是复苏希望,但数据不透明加剧了经济不确定性。

Colorado’s job market slumps as legislative economist calls out bad data

Read original at Colorado Public Radio

This is a part of an occasional series looking at aspects of Colorado’s faltering economy.Colorado’s job market is on shaky ground, but it’s increasingly hard to measure the magnitude of this economic temblor. The group that produces economic forecasts for the state legislature says problems with Colorado’s data make it difficult, if not impossible, to suss out the real story about the health of the job market.

At the same time, there’s a big hole in the numbers because nobody was collecting information on jobs during the government shutdown.If you’re not an economist, talking about jobs and the economy can be complicated. There are a lot of statistics from multiple sources to keep track of. The numbers are frequently revised and packaged in jargon.

But most people understand the importance of having a job and a steady paycheck when it comes to financial stability. A healthy job market is the bedrock of a healthy economy. So, is Colorado's economy healthy? The official data shows the state’s employment growth has been lagging the U.S. rate since early 2024.

There’s no obvious reason for Colorado’s weak employment numbers, but there are a couple of theories.Doubts in the dataOne possibility is that the data is simply wrong. Colorado’s labor department rolled out a new unemployment insurance computer system in 2023 that introduced significant errors in data collection.

Colorado’s jobs data was so unreliable that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the federal agency that collects and publishes jobs data, briefly stopped publishing Colorado’s numbers earlier this year.The problem has since been fixed, according to Colorado’s labor department. However, there are indications that the quality of the information submitted by employers may still be lower than it was before the system update, Tim Wonhof, Colorado’s director of the office of labor information, said in an emailed statement.

The state continues to “actively investigate whether, and the extent to which, employment and wages may not be represented in the data.” It keeps the doubts lingering, according to Greg Sobetski, chief economist for Colorado’s Legislative Council Staff, a nonpartisan group that produces economic forecasts for the state legislature.

“I am skeptical of the details of those growth rates … because relatively small methodological problems can really tell a different story about the condition that the economy's in,” Sobetski said. “If we're saying, well, employment increased by 1 percent, versus 0.5 percent, versus 0 percent, versus it fell by 0.

5 percent, those are relatively small differences in data quality … But they're radically different stories about the health of the economy.”His biggest qualm with the state’s data is there’s no way to align current statistics with those that predate the computer system overhaul.“I don't think there's a way to remediate the data to or rehabilitate the data such that they're consistent with the preexisting data,” he said.

Simply put, the experts that the state government rely on for economic information are skeptical of the labor department’s reports because there’s no way to match up the new data with the old data to track job growth in the long term.Revisions reveal swingsEven under the best circumstances, it’s impossible to get a perfect snapshot of the job market in real time.

The accuracy of the initial numbers depends in part on how long it takes for businesses to respond to government surveys. There are always revisions to the early estimates. Lately, those revisions have been large, especially for Colorado. In September, the federal agency estimated that Colorado added 51,000 fewer jobs than previously reported during the 12-month period ended in March.

The country overall created 911,000 fewer jobs than previously thought in the largest revision in U.S. history.Among the states, Colorado’s downward revision stood out as the second biggest behind North Carolina. On a percentage basis, Colorado had the biggest drop in job growth relative to prior estimates at 1.

8 percent.The revisions are still preliminary and will be adjusted again before they are finalized. If the current estimates hold, the job picture in Colorado is bleak.But according to Sobetski, information on wage withholdings in Colorado doesn’t line up with that grim forecast. “I would just say our expectations for the economy are largely not rooted in these data because we don't take them very seriously right now … I still think the data are pretty significantly impaired and I'm hesitant to rely on them,” he said.

Downturn in techBut what if the numbers are correct, and Colorado’s job market really is slowing dramatically? According to economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Colorado’s job growth stalled at the start of 2023. In early 2024, the state’s unemployment rate surpassed the U.S. rate for the first time since the oil bust of the 1980s.

A wave of layoffs in the technology sector in recent years hit Colorado particularly hard, according to David Rodziewicz, an economist with the Kansas City Fed, which analyzes economic data across the Rocky Mountain region.“We've seen a downturn in the tech industry, which Colorado is more concentrated in than the national average,” Rodziewicz said.

Technology accounted for roughly 12.5 percent of Colorado’s jobs from 2022 through 2024, compared with 9 percent for the U.S., he said.The last time the state’s unemployment outpaced the nation’s in the 80s, it was because Colorado’s employment base was heavily concentrated in the energy sector, which was in the midst of a major bust at the time.

Colorado’s economy is far more diversified than it was 40 years ago, but it’s a similar dynamic, according to Rodziewicz.“We had an industry-specific shock where Colorado was more concentrated,” he said. Some point to TrumpBut that’s not the whole story. Other industries in Colorado are also lagging.

For instance, construction hiring in the state is down, even as it’s growing in much of the country. “We’ve witnessed a concentration of growth in a select number of industries and relatively flat growth across many industries,” the labor department’s Wonhof said. “The latter is somewhat concerning, but not surprising.

” Wonhof pointed to President Donald Trump’s trade policies, interest rate policy and political dysfunction in Washington as the reasons behind a lack of business activity in Colorado and nationally. But if the numbers are to be believed, Colorado’s job engine started sputtering well before President Trump was sworn in for his second term.

The questionable data makes it hard to know whether muddled signals point to a recession. Either way, Coloradans are hoping for the ground to stabilize.Colorado’s economy is flashing warning signs. Job growth has slowed to a trickle. Layoffs are inching up. The housing market is in a slump. Both the state and its biggest population center are struggling to plug massive budget holes.

On top of all that, the longest government shutdown in history was weighing on the economy. The big question, though, is whether all the bleak data points to something more serious: recession. And the answer is complicated. Colorado Public Radio takes a look at what those warning signs might mean through the new series Silent Recession.

Read more stories in the series here.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts