特朗普的圣诞节战争

特朗普的圣诞节战争

2025-12-01Donald Trump
--:--
--:--
马老师
早上好 Norris,我是马老师,这里是为你专属打造的 Goose Pod。今天是12月2日,星期二。
李白
我乃李白。今朝有酒今朝醉,与君共论天下势。今日,我等便要剖析那“特朗普的圣诞节战争”。
马老师
没错,这个所谓的“战争”,其实是一场贸易战。你懂的,特朗普总统的关税政策,就像一套组合拳,直接打在了这个圣诞季的消费市场上。美国消费者预计要为礼物多花一大笔钱。
李白
哦?组合拳?听起来倒有几分江湖气。然此拳一出,万民遭殃。平均每家要多掏一百三十二美元,此非小数,乃是寻常百姓囊中之物,如今却要因庙堂一策而凭空流散。
马老师
流散到了哪里?大部分都进了政府的口袋。白宫本来认为这笔钱会让外国出口商来付,结果呢,是国内的进口商买单,总额高达一千一百八十亿美元。这完全是内力反噬,伤了自己人。
李白
苛政猛于虎也!名为保邦安民,实则敲骨吸髓。可怜那些贩夫走卒,本指望岁末能得些许盈余,如今却如履薄冰。那些装饰圣诞的华美之物,背后皆是小商户的血泪。
马老师
是的,特别是小企业,他们没有大公司的腾挪空间。大公司可以转移供应链,可以和供应商压价,甚至可以提前囤货。但小老板们呢?他们就像是武功尽失的江湖小虾米,只能硬抗。
李白
江湖小虾米?哈,比喻得好!想那特朗普,行事乖张,素以冲突为乐。其人之道,非王道,乃霸道也。他先前在媒体面前,不就曾扬言要赦免币安,突袭移民,还要断绝纽约金援吗?皆是虚张声势,搅乱一池春水罢了。
马老师
所以你看,他的这种 conflict-driven approach,冲突驱动的行事风格,也体现在了贸易政策上。他认为关税是万能的武器,可以用来谈判,可以保护产业,但最终的代价,却由普通人和小企业来承担。这个圣诞节,对他们来说,确实像一场战争。
马老师
要理解这场“战争”的根源,我们得回顾一下特朗普的武功秘籍。他主要用了两部法典:《国际紧急经济权力法》和“232条款”。这就像是他的独门绝技,左手一招“乾坤大挪移”,右手一招“降龙十八掌”,对着全世界的贸易伙伴一顿输出。
李白
哼,此等“绝技”,不过是强盗的逻辑,霸主的行径。想我大唐盛世,万国来朝,靠的是海纳百川的胸襟,而非高筑壁垒的短视。他将关税之剑挥向中国、加拿大、墨西哥乃至欧盟,剑锋所指,从钢铁铝材到家具药品,无一幸免。
马老师
没错,覆盖面非常广。结果就是,美国的平均应用关税税率,一下子飙升到了百分之十七点六,这是自1941年以来的最高点。你想想看,这相当于给整个经济体加了一个巨大的debuff,减益效果。所有进口商品都变贵了。
李白
国库倒是因此充盈了。十年之内,预计能增收两万三千亿美元。但这钱,真是取之于民,用之于何处?恐怕难填其先前减税留下的巨大窟窿。以天下之财,肥一己之私,非明君所为。
马老师
所以说,这是一个巨大的悖论。一方面国库有收入,但另一方面,经济学家预测,在外国报复之前,这些关税就会让美国GDP下降百分之零点六,损失超过五十五万个全职工作岗位。这笔账怎么算都不划算,你懂的。
李白
GDP为何物,我不知晓。但我知,五十余万生民的饭碗就此打破,背后便是五十余万个家庭的哀愁。数字冰冷,民生多艰。那所谓的“232条款”,听着冠冕堂皇,恐怕也只是托词。
马老师
“232条款”主要是针对钢铁和铝,理由是国家安全。但后来范围扩大到了汽车等许多产品。这就像武林中的一个门派,开始说只为自保,后来却想吞并整个江湖。其他国家当然不干了,中国、加拿大、欧盟都推出了自己的反制关税。
李白
以牙还牙,以眼还眼。冤冤相报何时了?此番贸易争端,如乱石投水,波及四海。不仅商贾受损,长远来看,国与国之间的信义也将荡然无存。高楼之上,制定规则之人,可曾想过楼下万家灯火的明灭?
马老师
这就是问题的核心。政策制定者往往只看宏观数据,但市场的真实反应,是无数个微观个体的痛苦叠加。这场贸易战的历史背景,就是一部由宏大叙事和个体悲剧交织而成的复杂剧本。
马老师
这场冲突的核心,其实是两种世界观的对决。特朗普的世界观,有点像19世纪的重商主义,你懂的。他认为关税是个好东西,是万能工具,可以用来谈判,可以把制造业带回美国,还能赚钱。他甚至觉得关税对美国人来说是“costless”,没有成本的。
李白
井底之蛙,坐井观天!他怎知四海之大,贸易之妙?互通有无,方能彼此受益,此乃千古不易之理。他以为高墙便能自保,殊不知是作茧自缚。宣称关税无成本,更是痴人说梦,掩耳盗铃之举。
马老师
对,现实恰恰相反。关税最终会通过更高的物价,转嫁给国内的消费者和企业。而且,这套策略的背后有三个主要动机:一是所谓的国家安全,保护敏感技术;二是为了“美国制造”,想让工厂都搬回来;三是平衡贸易逆差。每一个听起来都很有道理。
李白
名目倒是不少,听起来皆是为国为民。然其手段,却是杀鸡取卵,饮鸩止渴。为保一隅之安,而乱天下之序;为增一时之利,而损长久之基。此非智者所为,乃是赌徒之行径。
马老师
没错。所以企业就陷入了巨大的不确定性中。大公司有资源去应对,他们可以重新布局供应链,甚至加速自动化来降低成本。但小企业呢?他们就像被卷入华山论剑的普通路人,高手过招,最先受伤的总是他们。
李白
正是!强者愈强,弱者愈弱,此乃乱世之兆。朝廷政策多变,如风云莫测,令商贾无所适从。今日之友,或为明日之敌。此等环境下,何人敢放手一搏,投资未来?人心惶惶,百业凋敝,皆由此始。
马老师
所以,这场冲突的本质,就是一种简单粗暴的、零和博弈的旧思维,与全球化时代下,复杂、多赢的商业现实之间的激烈碰撞。结果就是,稳定被打破,信任被侵蚀,而买单的,永远是那些最脆弱的群体。
马老师
说到影响,那可是实实在在的。最直接的就是出口。有预测说,美国的出口额可能会因此下降四千五百一十亿美元。这是一个巨大的数字,对经济来说,就像是被人废了条臂膀,损失惨重。
李白
四千余亿!如此巨额的财富,本可造福多少百姓,如今却因一人之策而烟消云散。江河断流,商船不行,本是鱼米之乡,恐将变为萧瑟之地。这不仅是数字的损失,更是国力的耗损。
马老师
而且,供应链的 disruption,也就是中断和混乱,导致了成本上升。关税就像一个隐藏的税,制造商和零售商不得不提高价格,最终还是消费者来承担。所以,圣诞节礼物变贵,只是这个巨大影响下的一个小小缩影。
李白
诚如是。昔日繁华的市集,如今可能门可罗雀。那些以手艺为生的小商铺,恐将难以为继,最终关门大吉。一将功成万骨枯,这贸易战的“功成”,背后是无数小商家的“骨枯”。
马老师
是的,小企业的倒闭潮是一个非常令人担忧的后果。他们不像大公司那样有抗风险能力。一个关税的浪头打过来,他们的小船可能就直接翻了。这不仅仅是经济问题,更是社会问题,会影响到就业和社区的活力。
李白
社稷之本,在于万民。民若不安,国之焉附?当权者眼中只有冰冷的数字和所谓的国家利益,却不见街头巷尾的叹息与泪水。此番影响,如瘟疫蔓延,其伤痛,恐非一时半刻可以平复。
马老师
那么未来会怎么样?我认为,最大的问题就是不确定性。有经济学家甚至说,所有的经济预测模型,现在都可以“扔出门外”了。因为贸易政策变得太不可预测,就像一个武林高手不按套路出牌,你根本不知道他下一招是什么。
李白
乱世之中,英雄何为?依我之见,与其坐而待毙,不如主动求变。商家当如狡兔三窟,另辟蹊径,或寻觅新的货源,或开拓本土市场。不可将所有鸡蛋,皆置于一篮之内。
马老师
对,多元化是关键。同时,政府的支持也很重要。虽然有些支持项目,像加拿大的数字采用计划,听起来不错,但很多时候是远水解不了近渴。像你说的,不能光“烧钱”,需要一个清晰、连贯的计划,打通整个生态系统。
李白
善!授人以鱼,不如授人以渔。与其直接给予金钱,不如营造一个公平、稳定的经商环境,让商家能安心经营,自由驰骋。这才是长久之计,治国之本。否则,再多的援助,也只是扬汤止沸。
马老师
说得好。所以今天的核心 takeaway 就是,贸易战没有赢家,它对普通家庭和小企业造成的伤害是真实而深远的。感谢收听 Goose Pod。
李白
愿世间再无此等纷争,愿万家灯火长明。明日此时,你我煮酒再论。再会。

特朗普的圣诞节战争是一场由关税引发的贸易战。美国消费者和企业,尤其是小企业,为此支付了高昂代价,圣诞礼物变贵,经济面临不确定性。此举虽意在“美国制造”和平衡贸易,却损及国内经济和国际信义,无赢家可言。

Donald Trump’s War on Christmas

Read original at The Atlantic

It’s a bad year for shoppers. It’s a terrible year for small-business owners.Illustration by The Atlantic. Source: Anna Moneymaker / Getty.Listen to more stories on the Noa app.President Donald Trump might not be ruining Christmas, but he’s making it more expensive. American families are expected to spend $1 trillion on gifts and other goods this November and December, roughly 4 percent more than they spent last year.

But they’re paying more for everything—artificial trees, ornaments, toys, novelty sweaters. They have fewer options to choose from when they log on to Etsy and browse upscale boutiques. Some retailers have stopped shipping to the United States, and some have gone out of business—all thanks to Trump’s globe-engulfing and pointless trade war.

Holiday shoppers might not notice that things are a little less merry and bright than they would have been otherwise. The average family is expected to spend $132 more this year because of tariffs—not nothing, but not enough to break the bank, either. But wage growth has been cooling. The unemployment rate has been rising.

Consumer confidence has been falling sharply. Rent, co-pays, mortgages, car payments, and utilities remain brutal for average families to afford—and health insurance is about to get radically more expensive. In recent weeks, customers have started shopping at cheaper outlets, buying fewer items, and putting off major expenses.

Shoppers are looking for deals, but it has not been easy for stores to provide them. When Trump kicked off the trade war early this year, the White House argued that foreign exporters would pay the fees slapped on goods from nearly every American trading partner. Instead, the government has collected $118 billion and counting from domestic importers.

Big companies have managed to dodge and shuffle in response: pressing their suppliers for discounts, stocking up and storing products to get ahead of the tariffs, rerouting their supply lines, buying merchandise from lightly tariffed countries. Retailers including Walmart have managed to keep their sales figures up and hold costs down, for the most part.

Yet many companies have run out of warehoused items, leaving them no choice but to raise sticker prices or cut into their profits.Small companies have had fewer options. Many small-scale businesses lack the time, bandwidth, or travel budget to find new overseas suppliers—especially when big importers are doing so too.

Boutiques don’t have the bargaining power to press manufacturers and shipping companies for discounts. Single-person firms cannot take out loans to buy up stock and move it to the United States before a trade levy hits. Many small firms cannot change their product lines, either.As a result, the trade war has helped large companies squeeze out their smaller competitors.

Many small firms have closed down, fired workers, watched their sales fall apart, or worse. In a new survey, 71 percent of small-business owners said they expect the trade war to depress their revenue this holiday season. Only 5 percent said they were hiring and expanding their business.The holiday season “is our Super Bowl,” Nichole MacDonald told me.

“This is when we’re supposed to make all of our money.” MacDonald runs the Sash Bag, a company that manufactures and sells specialty handbags. Like many retailers, the Sash Bag generates an outsize share of its annual sales and profits leading up to Christmas. But this year, she said, she is “literally terrified.

” Batches of her bags are stuck in two warehouses in India because she cannot produce the $430,000 needed to cover the import tariffs on the goods. “That product is done,” she said. “It’s sewn. It’s perfectly saleable—beautiful leather, beautiful Sash bags, sitting in India for months because I don’t have the budget to bring it here.

”In addition, she has let go some of her employees, raised prices by 10 to 15 percent, canceled special orders, and considered finding new suppliers. But “people don’t understand” how hard that is to do, MacDonald told me, when you have “your own proprietary product, not something a manufacturer has already invented or already created.

”Struggling firms aren’t the economy’s only problem. The government shutdown has depressed the Washington, D.C., metro economy. Concerns about artificial intelligence and the growth outlook have led businesses of all sizes to quit hiring, and some have started firing workers too. Households have noticed those changes and are limiting their spending.

Yet companies don’t have much room to win back customers by cutting prices, in many cases—because of the tariffs, which are at their highest effective rate in close to a century. The country is in a stagflationary, queasy state as the year comes to a close, and it’s not doing much for anyone’s holiday spirit.

“Are they literally trying to make it impossible to run a business?” MacDonald asked me. Because “that’s how it feels.”

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts