分析师:美国楼市将迎“比2008更糟”价格回调

分析师:美国楼市将迎“比2008更糟”价格回调

2025-11-28Business
--:--
--:--
雷总
早上好 hanjf12,我是雷总,这里是专为你打造的 Goose Pod。今天是11月29日,星期六,早上6点。
董小姐
我是董小姐。我们今天来聊一个相当劲爆的话题:有分析师预测,美国楼市将迎来“比2008年更糟糕”的价格回调。
雷总
没错,这位分析师叫 Melody Wright。她的预测非常具体,她认为房价最早在明年就可能腰斩,下跌近50%。她给出的核心逻辑是,房价最终会回调到与家庭收入中位数相匹配的水平。
董小姐
腰斩?这个说法可不是闹着玩的。2008年的危机我们都还记忆犹新,她说会“更糟”,而且“瓦解速度更快”,这必定有她的理由。我想知道,是什么支撑了她如此大胆的判断?是市场出现了什么具体的信号吗?
雷总
信号是有的。她提到,目前市场的库存不断增加,但需求在萎缩。特别是在疫情期间被过度炒作的“阳光地带”和南部地区,房价已经开始降温。全国范围内的房价增长也基本停滞了。这就像我们做产品,如果库存积压,出货量又跟不上,那价格必然要调整。
董小姐
这是很基本的市场规律,供需关系决定价格。但是从增长停滞到暴跌一半,这中间的鸿沟可不小。她是不是看到了更深层次的问题?比如,谁在抛售?又是谁会在这场风暴中第一个倒下?
雷总
问到点子上了。她特别提到了一个群体:投资者。她说,上一轮危机还没跌到底,华尔街就进场抄底了。但现在,这些投资者自己都开始在电视上“哭诉”,说他们赚不到钱了。一旦他们大规模撤离,市场就会失去最后的买家。
董小姐
我明白了。当那些只为短期利益而来的投机者开始退潮时,市场的真实面目才会显现。而且,这些投资者持有的房产,一旦被抛弃,没人维护,状况只会越来越糟,这会加速市场的恐慌和混乱。这棋局,确实危险。
雷总
是啊,一提到“比2008年更糟”,就不能不回顾一下当年到底发生了什么。我记得当时最火的词就是“次贷危机”。从技术角度看,它就是个金融产品的设计缺陷,把高风险的贷款打包成看起来很安全的资产,卖给全世界。
董小姐
你这个说法很工程师。在我看来,那就是一场失控的赌博。根源在于,银行为了利润,把钱贷给了根本不该买房的人,也就是所谓的“次级”借款人。这就像我们卖电器,明知道对方的用电环境不达标,还把大功率设备卖给他,迟早要出事。
雷总
没错。而且当时还有各种“金融创新”,比如只付利息、超低“引诱性”利率的贷款。这导致从1994年到2004年,美国的房屋拥有率从64%飙升到69%的历史高点。数据看上去很美,但泡沫就是这么吹起来的。房价和家庭收入的比率,也从正常的3倍左右涨到了4.6倍。
董小姐
这种脱离基本面的增长,就是空中楼阁。我们做企业的,最看重的就是现金流和利润。当时很多人买房,并不是为了住,而是为了短期内转手卖掉赚钱。这种投机行为,让整个市场变成了击鼓传花的游戏,就看谁是最后一个接到棒的倒霉蛋。
雷总
对,特别是房地产投资者。有数据显示,在市场顶峰时期,近一半的购房抵押贷款都流向了投资者。而且他们的违约率比普通房主高得多。一旦房价开始下跌,他们会毫不犹豫地选择断供,因为房子对他们来说只是一个金融工具,不是家。
董小姐
所以说,任何时候都不能偏离“用户价值”。房子是用来住的,这是它的核心价值。当它被过度金融化,变成纯粹的投机品时,危机就离我们不远了。2008年的教训就是,当所有人都认为可以闭着眼睛赚钱的时候,往往就是风险最大的时候。
雷总
说到这里,就引出了一个核心的矛盾点:在这样的市场里,政府到底应不应该干预?一方观点认为,市场失灵是政府干预的前提。当房价高到大多数人无法承受,形成了住房可负担性危机时,就需要政府出手。
董小姐
我不太认同“市场失灵”这个说法。市场有它自己的调节机制。现在的问题是,建筑商都跑去盖豪宅了,因为那边利润高。他们愿意为高尔夫球场和匹克球场买单的富人服务。入门级的平价房,利润薄,没人愿意碰,这怎么能怪市场呢?
雷总
但这确实导致了一个结果,就是普通人的选择越来越少。这就像手机市场,如果所有厂商都只做万元以上的旗舰机,那普通用户怎么办?从长远看,有人说今天盖的豪宅,二三十年后会变成明天的二手经济房,但这解决不了眼下的问题。
董小姐
短期阵痛是难免的。企业就是要追逐利润,这是天性。如果政策强行扭曲,要求企业不赚钱去做事,那最终会伤害整个行业的创新和活力。我们不能总想着靠外力来解决问题,关键还是要看市场自身如何演变和消化。
雷总
但这种演变的过程,对很多人来说太漫长了。你看,现在社会财富在分化,富裕家庭和工薪阶层的经济状况差距越来越大。如果市场完全迎合高端需求,那社会的裂痕可能会越来越大。这不仅仅是经济问题,也是一个社会问题。
董小姐
社会问题需要综合治理,不能只让房地产行业来背锅。我相信市场的力量,优胜劣汰,最终会找到一个平衡点。强行干预,往往会带来意想不到的副作用,甚至可能让问题变得更糟。还是要尊重规律。
雷总
无论争论如何,我们已经看到了一些实实在在的影响。数据显示,2025年第三季度,美国的止赎申请数量,也就是因为还不起贷款而被银行收房的案例,同比增加了17%,超过了10万户。这可不是个小数字。
董小姐
这是压力传导的必然结果。高利率、高房价,再加上通货膨胀,普通家庭的日子不好过。很多人当年可能是用很低的利率锁定了贷款,但现在一旦出现失业或者意外支出,资金链就很容易断裂。这对消费市场的打击是巨大的。
雷总
是的,而且房产是很多家庭最大的一笔财富。房价下跌不仅意味着财富缩水,还会导致消费信心严重不足。2008年那次,超过800万个家庭失去了家园,9500万个家庭因为邻居被止赎而导致自己的房产也跟着贬值。这种连锁反应非常可怕。
董小姐
所以说,房地产市场的健康,关系到整个经济的稳定。它不是一个孤立的行业。一次大的衰退,会带来大量的失业,无数家庭的梦想会因此破灭。我们从上次危机中学到的教训,就是必须要有更严格的监管和更负责任的贷款标准。
雷总
说到未来,市场的看法也很有趣,可以说是冰火两重天。一方面,是 Melody Wright 这样极度悲观的预测。但另一方面,美国全国房地产经纪人协会(NAR)却预测,2026年房价不但不会跌,还要上涨4%,销量更是会有两位数的增长。
董小姐
这就很有意思了。一个看空,一个看多,而且都是业内人士。在我看来,关键要看底层的供需关系。现在美国面临着一个长期的结构性问题:住房短缺。有研究说,到2035年,住房缺口可能高达960万套。
雷总
没错,这是一个核心矛盾。只要房子不够住,那么价格在长期来看就很难真正地大幅下跌。也许短期的金融动荡会让价格回调,但只要供不应求的基本面不变,市场最终还是会稳定下来。看来,解决住房危机,关键还是得靠“多建房”。
雷总
今天讨论的核心,是一个关于美国楼市可能面临比2008年更严重回调的大胆预测。这确实是一个值得我们所有人关注的警报。
董小姐
感谢收听 Goose Pod。我们明天再见。

分析师预测美国楼市将迎“比2008年更糟”的价格回调,房价可能腰斩。核心逻辑是房价将回归与家庭收入中位数匹配的水平。市场库存增加、需求萎缩,以及投资者大规模撤离是主要信号。2008年次贷危机教训深刻,过度金融化和投机行为是风险根源。

Price correction “worse than 2008” coming to US housing market—analyst

Read original at Newsweek

The U.S. housing market is going to face a price correction “worse than 2008,” according to housing analyst Melody Wright, who expects home prices to drop in half as soon as next year.“I think…we’re going to correct all the way to a point where household median income matches the home price, the median home price.

And so that is going to be worse than 2008. This could devolve a lot faster than last time,” Wright said during an interview with Adam Taggart, host of Thoughtful Money, published on YouTube.What Is Happening in the Housing Market?Rising inventory and dwindling demand have brought down home prices in many U.

S. metropolitan areas this year, especially in those markets in the Sunbelt and the South which became overheated between 2020 and 2022. At the national level, the vertiginous price growth that characterized the pandemic years has also slowed to a grind, with the median sale price of a home in October only 1.

2 percent higher than a year ago, according to Redfin, at $439,701. According to a new report from Zillow, 53 percent of all U.S. homes lost value over the past 12 months—the most since 2012. While affordability has slightly improved, however, millions of Americans are still being kept on the sidelines of the housing market by higher home prices, property taxes, and home insurance premiums, as well as still-elevated borrowing costs.

Wright told Taggart that, while it is hard to say whether home prices at the national level have fallen this year, “you can definitely see the deceleration happening.”It has been a difficult year for the U.S. housing market. While price growth has stalled, home prices remain much higher than they were before the pandemic in much of the country.

In April, what Wright calls “the tariff terror” caused many buyers to have “cold feet” and delay home purchases while waiting to see what the impact of President Donald Trump’s policies would be on the U.S. economy.The only transactions that continued happening in the U.S. market at volume this spring and summer, she said, were for higher-priced homes.

“You have this bifurcated housing market, but the majority of folks transacting are in these upper tiers, so your median [home price] is going to be higher,” Wright said.“However, what I’ve been seeing over the last three months, and this is—I get into the dirty dirty details—underneath the covers, that $100,000-$250,000 sales price, we are starting to see incremental increases in sales in that category,” she added.

“And so as it continues, it will start to drag the median down. It’s happening already and that’s where we’re seeing the deceleration,” Wright said, adding that we are going to end the year with “flat” home price growth.Steeper cuts will come later, she warned. “It’s going to be worse,” she said, when asked to make a prediction about 2026.

What Does Wright Expect To Happen Next Year?Wright is expecting a big drop in home prices next year, as investors who are not making money from their properties withdraw from the market.“What happened last time was, we were on our way down to where household median income would actually match home median prices, but we never got there because Wall Street came in to buy those [homes],” Wright said.

“But now they’re crying on TV,” she said, adding that some investors are claiming they were asked by government-backed mortgage agencies to intervene and purchase those properties. “They’re going to start crying a lot louder soon and say, ‘Hey, we saved you, government.’ And so, who’s the buyer now?

” Wright said she fears the government might be forced to step in as "the buyer of last resort."Another fear Wright has is about the quality of the homes that investors are likely going to be leaving behind. “In the last cycle, remember how many all-cash buyers we’ve had? When these are not on a bank’s balance sheet, there’s nobody that’s going to be cutting the grass, there’s nobody that’s going to be winterizing that home, taking care of the mold problem,” she added.

“And so I think we could see this kind of devolve into chaos a lot faster than we did last time as many investors abandon these properties.”Wright then said that next year home prices might correct to the point where they match the median household income. In 2024, according to data from the U.S. Census, that median was $83,730.

That is going to be a price decline “near your 50 percent,” she said. “And much greater in certain areas.”

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

分析师:美国楼市将迎“比2008更糟”价格回调 | Goose Pod | Goose Pod